Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,311 posts)
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:49 PM May 2015

Are these two punks, or thugs?

Sometimes these asshole gang-bangers earn the epithets.

Two teenagers, burn down an apartment building in a "gang retaliation" incident.

70 people have lost everything or nearly everything due to these two.

Prosecutor: Green Bay apartment arson was gang retaliation

Two suspects in a Green Bay apartment building fire are being held on $100,000 bail.

A prosecutor claims gang retaliation was the motive for setting the fire.

Monday night’s fire at 1011 North Danz Avenue left 70 people without a home and caused almost $700,000 in damage to the building, which has been condemned.

Jesse Jones, 18, and Jordan Gardner, 17, were in court Friday afternoon on charges of arson and recklessly endangering safety. They’re also both charged with burglary for an unrelated incident.

http://wbay.com/2015/04/30/two-arrested-for-green-bay-apartment-fire/

http://wbay.com/2015/05/01/fire-victims-react-to-arson-arrests/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Archae

(46,311 posts)
3. No. But sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. -Groucho Marx
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:56 PM
May 2015

And these two assholes deserve as much time in jail as they get.

There is no excuse whatsoever for what they did.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
2. Lifetime penal colony residents sounds about right
Fri May 1, 2015, 08:55 PM
May 2015

Wanton disregard for innocent lives is inexcusable.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. I believe the term is "arsonists?"
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:06 PM
May 2015

There might be an "attempted murder" charge or ten in that story, too, depending.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
14. It depends
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:50 AM
May 2015

If they are black, they are not thugs.

"Punk" may soon be declared the new "thug."

You must type out "criminals." Until that is declared race based.



 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
16. They earn the harshest of epithets, but one shouldn't use racist epithets to describe them.
Sat May 2, 2015, 07:54 AM
May 2015

Just call them "scum" or something like that if you want something that expresses your complete disgust with them as human beings.

Note: I have used "thug" myself very recently to describe violent black criminals, but just yesterday became convinced that it has become a racially-loaded term.

Archae

(46,311 posts)
17. Funny thing, in the days of Al Capone and such...
Sat May 2, 2015, 11:43 AM
May 2015

A "thug" looked like this, in the popular news media of the day, mostly newspapers.



(Philadelphia gangster)

http://www.easternstate.org/explore/tour-guide-chronicles/organized-crime-eastern-state

Nowadays a white thug looks most of the time like this, or has lots of facial tattoos he got in prison.



It's not racial.
It's thoughts and deeds.

The guy who beat me up 30 years ago, raped a 13-year old boy and tried to grab a 9-year old girl in a park, all here in Sheboygan is white.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
18. Jury results
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:02 PM
May 2015

On Sat May 2, 2015, 10:51 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Are these two punks, or thugs?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026605455

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Look folks, we've gone over this the last couple days. "Thug" is a racist dog whistle. It's not okay to post this crap here. They are arsonists. End. Of.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat May 2, 2015, 11:01 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I believe I predicted this a few days ago. Will be watching the results intently. If words start resulting in hides and banning, I'll be gone. I already have a Mommy.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I must be missing something. "Thug" is a criminal, regardless of race? When I hear thug, I think of the mob or gangsters from the 30s. The term is colorblind.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Archae

(46,311 posts)
19. This is why there still is a "criminal class."
Sat May 2, 2015, 12:08 PM
May 2015

It doesn't matter what racial group they are from.

Here in Sheboygan, the biggest criminal gangs are not white. Not black. Not Hispanic.
They are Asian, most often Hmong.

But we still call a 16-year old gangbanger a "child."
"Her baby."
Etc...

The people in Baltimore who looted and burned that CVS are not "protestors."
They are rioters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are these two punks, or t...