Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:59 PM May 2015

Justice Ginsburg Eviscerates The Case Against Marriage Equality In Just Five Sentences

&quot Same-sex couples) wouldn’t be asking for this relief if the law of marriage was what it was a millennium ago. I mean, it wasn’t possible. Same-sex unions would not have opted into the pattern of marriage, which was a relationship, a dominant and a subordinate relationship. Yes, it was marriage between a man and a woman, but the man decided where the couple would be domiciled; it was her obligation to follow him.

There was a change in the institution of marriage to make it egalitarian when it wasn’t egalitarian. And same-sex unions wouldn’t — wouldn’t fit into what marriage was once."

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/04/29/3652468/justice-ginsburg-eviscerates-case-marriage-equality-just-five-sentences/

Thank you, Justice Ginsburg!

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Ginsburg Eviscerates The Case Against Marriage Equality In Just Five Sentences (Original Post) Hepburn May 2015 OP
Big ass kick! Agschmid May 2015 #1
Bring on equality and bring on the ugliest americans alive, i.e. evangelical christians who will NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #2
Go Justice! shenmue May 2015 #3
Love me some Justice Ginsburg!!!! n/t Hepburn May 2015 #4
K & R! SoapBox May 2015 #5
So perfect Lee-Lee May 2015 #6
Exactly salib May 2015 #7
Bingo! So stick that in your damn Bible and smoke it! valerief May 2015 #8
The definition of marriage has changed since Biblical Times AnnieBW May 2015 #9
She's my favorite. leftyladyfrommo May 2015 #10
Oh, I get it now. In a gay marriage, Republicans can't figure out which partner owns the other one. tclambert May 2015 #11

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
2. Bring on equality and bring on the ugliest americans alive, i.e. evangelical christians who will
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:01 PM
May 2015

want a war over this

AnnieBW

(10,413 posts)
9. The definition of marriage has changed since Biblical Times
Sun May 3, 2015, 04:27 PM
May 2015

I mean, my husband didn't buy me for two goats and a cow, nor was I divorced and sent back to my family in disgrace when I did not bear children. Meanwhile, my MIL has married twice since my FIL died in 1990 - and she was well past her child-bearing age when she did. Are these marriages less valid because they didn't produce children?

leftyladyfrommo

(18,866 posts)
10. She's my favorite.
Mon May 4, 2015, 10:26 AM
May 2015

Outspoken and smart.

Well, actually I really like all the women on the court. I wish we had a couple more.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
11. Oh, I get it now. In a gay marriage, Republicans can't figure out which partner owns the other one.
Mon May 4, 2015, 12:42 PM
May 2015

When it was one man-one woman (or one man-multiple women), obviously the man owns his wife (or wives).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Ginsburg Eviscera...