General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho is hate group founder Pamela Geller?
Before posting this bio, I want to say how frustrated and pained I am by what happened yesterday at Geller's bullshit cartoon contest. Frustrated because this plays into the hands of an appalling hate monger and works toward legitimizing someone who is, simply put, an insane, virulently hateful bigot. I'm pained for the same reason and because I fear that this could attract more nuts in support of Geller's "work". What is that work? Spreading hate and violence under the guise of "educating" people about Islam.
Here's the bio:
The woman at the center of Sundays Draw Muhammad event, where three people were shot, is controversial blogger and activist Pamela Geller, whom the Southern Poverty Law Center has described as the anti-Muslim movements most visible and flamboyant figurehead.
Geller, who began her career as a journalist for the New York Daily News and went on to become associate publisher of the New York Observer, first came to the attention of many Americans in 2010, when she helped to derail the Park51 Project near Ground Zero, condemning the proposed Islamic community center as shrine to the very ideology that inspired the jihadist attacks of 9/11 and campaigning for protests throughout the country. Geller continued to rail against the spread of Islam through her blog, Atlas Shrugs, where she wrote of her belief that President Obama is a secret Muslim who wants to destroy the United States from within the White House and is the love child of Malcolm X.
The blogger is also a co-founder, along with Robert Spencer, of the New York-based American Freedom Defense Institute, which says it is committed to preventing specific Islamic supremacist initiatives in American cities. The organization rose to international fame when a federal court ruled on grounds of free speech that New York City was required to run the anti-Muslim ads Geller had purchased in 2012. In any war between the civilized man and the savage, Gellers ad read, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad. Critics, among them prominent national Jewish organizations, were quick to condemn the ads as Islamophobic, but Geller continued to push her anti-Muslim rhetoric through a series of transit ads, including a recent bus billboard containing the phrase Hamas Killing Jews. In response, the citys MTA board voted last week to ban all political ads on its subways and buses.
Gellers rise to stardom as the queen of anti-Muslim activism is amplified by her international influence and well-funded network of Islamophobes around the world. Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian extremist who killed 76 people in a shooting rampage in 2011, cited both Geller and Spencer in his 1,500-page manifesto. The United Kingdoms home secretary banned both Geller and Spencer ahead of a speaking engagement in 2013, labeling the AFDI a hate group.
<snip>
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/04/up-to-speed-who-is-muhammad-cartoon-contest-organizer-pamela-geller.html
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)It's apparent from this article that she's a hate-filled anti-Muslim who wants to bring war wherever she goes. I too am pained & saddened by violence of any sort. I also believe one hundred percent in free speech and freedom of the press. I wish the most violent islamaphobes and radical fundamentalists would duke it out amongst themselves and stop dragging everyone else who desires peace into their drama. Of course, murder should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)'I wish the most violent islamaphobes and radical fundamentalists would duke it out amongst themselves and stop dragging everyone else who desires peace into their drama'
Yes. Sometimes I wish they could just be sent off to some desert island together, where they could either learn co-operate in the cause of survival/perish through their refusal to do so/ murder each other, but at least leave others alone!
7962
(11,841 posts)Instead, they got exactly the response that will further the message they are trying to put out.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ever happen to her movement and career.
Having an ISIS-wannabe shoot at her conference is gold for her
http://az.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110314_0000473.DAZ.htm/qx
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)She and the Muslim fundies really have so much in common!
Emelina
(188 posts)I would like to know what propels her in her quest.
Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamela_Geller
Vinca
(50,267 posts)Hate is a major industry in this country.
cali
(114,904 posts)What is your point?
Emelina
(188 posts)There is always something that triggers all people who get into a political cause, whether it is one that is desirable or not.
cali
(114,904 posts)Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)I had a friend online back then and Sept 11 turned her instantly from a reasonably normal liberal type to a frothing at the mouth hater of all Muslims. I suspect Pam Geller was always politically stinky, but if that could happen to my friend, I can see how it happened to others...
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)I detest insane far-RW hatemongers who devote their lives to inspiring and instigating violence. That applies to the extremist Muslim gunmen, and it also applies to Pamela Geller.
chalmers
(288 posts)she is also embraced by notoriously anti-semitic groups in the US.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)worst elements of Islam in order to overthrow regimes like Syria then they demonize all muslims based on the actions of the extremists they bankroll and support. This is a batshit insane country.
I'll bet these guys that shot at her were indoctrinated by one of the mullahs we funded to overthrow some middle eastern regime.
It is also possible she paid some gangbangers to do a hit job on the place just make herself look more a victim. The shooters don't look like devout muslims. She is a manipulative ass.
pampango
(24,692 posts)of Islam in order to overthrow regimes like Syria."
I have never heard her say a good word about ISIS or a bad word about Mr. Assad.
They got exactly what they wanted. They planned for it. They incited this response. They hired a shit-ton of security and they held it in Texas, ferchrissake, full of tea party haters and where they knew there would be a big response to the hate-mongering she does. Lots of gleeful hate there....
Sure, she has the freedom of speech, but she doesn't have the freedom to incite violence, which is pretty much what she did. She has a history of inciting hate. And of course they played right into her little drama, making her case for her. "Oh! They're against free speech!" Come on, nobody's that naive. As if no one knows they react with violence to this sort of thing. They're not attacking speech. They're attacking hate, and it's only too easy to bait them. She knows exactly how. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
kracer20
(199 posts)I agree 100% Novara.
In my mind, they crossed the line. Your freedom of speech should end when you are inciting violence like they did.
Honestly, a "draw Muhammad cartoon contest" I would have honestly thought this was an Onion article...
closeupready
(29,503 posts)this entire bullshit event - why they chose Texas, what the point was.
Get the truth from her under penalty of perjury.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Because if what you say became law of the land all racists have to do is threaten violence and now an NAACP rally is "inciting violence", homophobe have to threaten violence and a gay pride event is "inciting violence".
If all it takes is someone threatening violence against speech they don't like to turn it into "inciting violence" and something you say shouldn't be allowed you are just encouraging violence. You are telling everyone all they have to do is make threats of violent response to have anything they don't like shut down.
As detestable a human being as she is- the blame for the violence is 100% on the persons who committed the violent acts. Anything else gives power and legitimacy to te use of violence to shut down speech and free expression- and that's not tolerable. Tolerating it in a case where we don't like the people attacked just sets the precedent for people who don't like what we say to use the same twisted justification and actions against any cause we support down the roaf.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)This isn't quite as simple as you are making it out to be.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)and inciting violence by committing acts that the anti abortion crowd didn't like.
I can see where your going, blaming those who spoke against abortion for the violence. But that's not a valid analogy here- if it was people would be blaming the violent voices inside Islam for this violence.
But they are not, by blaming the people putting this contest on for the violence they are blaming the equivalent of the clinic owner for the abortion doctors death.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)None of the Bill of Rights amendments are absolutes. There are limits and exceptions. You cannot say its OK to kill people because your religion calls for it. You cannot yell fire in a crowded theater if there is no fire. You cannot build and keep nuclear, biological or chemical weapons because the second amendment guarantees a right to bear arms, etc.
There is a real question whether the signs Gellar fought to have put on NYC MTA buses are within 1st amendment rights.
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1945172.1411094439!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_970/transitads19n-2-web.jpg
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Can you ever come up with drawing a cartoon, any cartoon, as not being protected.
And if you do, just because someone threatens violence if someone draws it, you are saying that a threat of violence trumps the First Amendment- and just encouraging more violence against speech anyone doesn't like.
A decidedly unprogressive stance.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Just because in this case they attacked a voice you despise.
When people do that, our nation loses.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)DustyJoe
(849 posts)If a simple drawing that could be considered an expressionist art form can be labelled as hate speech/art etc simply because it depicts a group in what that group sees as blasphemous depictions, then would the 'cricifix in urine' or 'piss christ' be seen the same even though no catholics/christians went in and shot up the exhibit areas that art was displayed ? First amendment either works for all, or for none.
Oktober
(1,488 posts)Sure seems to be a lot of that going around today.
marym625
(17,997 posts)She is a hateful person and her group is listed as a hate group
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/pamela-geller
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Interesting stuff from splcenter.
marym625
(17,997 posts)lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)In Her Own Words
"Islam is not a race. This is an ideology. This is an extreme ideology, the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth."
Pam Geller On Fox Business' "Follow the Money," March 10, 2011
"Obama is a third worlder and a coward. He will do nothing but beat up on our friends to appease his Islamic overlords."
Pam Geller, AtlasShrugs.com, April 13, 2010
"Hussein (meaning President Obama) is a muhammadan. He's not insane
he wants jihad to win."
Pam Geller, AtlasShrugs.com, April 11, 2010
"I don't think that many westernized Muslims know when they pray five times a day that they're cursing Christians and Jews five times a day.
I believe in the idea of a moderate Muslim. I do not believe in the idea of a moderate Islam."
Pam Geller, The New York Times, Oct. 8, 2010
marym625
(17,997 posts)I don't think anyone is defending her. They're defending the first amendment
Gothmog
(145,130 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)Duck dynasty
Duggers
Palin net
The whole NRA thing
Fricken money to burn
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)I may dislike Geller's politics, but I support Draw Muhammad days and Draw Muhammad contests -- no matter who initiates them -- as a means of standing for free speech and free expression. DU is always quick to criticize the attempts of Christians to ban books from libraries that are deemed offensive, and quick to praise those who subvert those efforts. This is no different. You may dislike Geller, and may dislike Geller's motives, but I'll stand with her to the extent that I will not tolerate (and nor should you) those who threaten Molly Norris, thosw who committed the murders at Charlie Hebdo, or those who murdered Theo Van Gogh.
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)And I wouldn't stand with her to any extent at all. That goes for other bigots who peddle hate for a living.
Novara
(5,841 posts)It's about hate and inciting a reaction to it.
How would you feel if there was an extended gun battle and a couple of good old white 'Murkans got caught in the crossfire and died? Maybe by a cop's bullet? She is lucky that the only dead are the people she incited to violence.
It's naive to say this was only about free speech. That's just like Bush saying that al Qaeda hates us for our freedoms. No, they hate us for disrespecting their deepest held beliefs and for our arrogantly-held power in the region.
How would you feel if someone had a "draw Jesus" cartoon contest that essentially mocked everything Christians hold dear about Jesus, and a few of the rednecked faithful came out with guns blazing? Would you defend mocking Jesus as free speech too? Of course they have a right to mock Jesus! Right? Sure they do, but be prepared for the violence that may result.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)If a group of homophobes starts getting more and more violent, would you accuse organizers of a gay pride event of causing the violence?
Your stance here is that if anyone threatens violence because they are offended then whatever they threaten violence about should not be done- you can't just say that applies only when it's something you don't like.
Attitudes like your just excuse and enable those who seek to use violence to control the behavior of others.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)South Park, Life of Brian, Mark Twain, it's done all the time. And some Christians have had violent reactions, for example Martin Scorsese' serious but alternative telling of the 'Last Temptation of the Christ' so angered some extremist Christians in France that they firebombed a cinema screening the film, inflicting serious injury to many people with intent to kill. This was 1988. Those 'Christians' were nothing but murderous, violent criminals.
Johnyawl
(3,205 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)And I agree. But Geller is not doing this to promote free speech.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)She idolizes Ayn Rand.
ananda
(28,858 posts)Truly awful, horrible people with ugly evil agendas.
But free speech is free speech.
There are ways of dealing with hate that do not
involve murder or violence.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)"@PamelaGeller Gee, thanks for subjecting me and other New Yorkers to that ugly message."
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)She's overflowing with so many ugly messages
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)That's the only way to prevent these ugly messages and respect the first amendment.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)insults and degrades others constantly and is never called out for it by those who claim they oppose hate speech. Look at how popular the Pope is on DU. Man says LGBT are defective, our rights come from Satan, we 'disfigure God' and some on DU hold him up as a progressive hero.
Hypocrites are hypocrites. Let me know when there are 24/7 pickets at ATLAH.
Violet_Crumble
(35,961 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Landmark Violations Could Force Atlah Worldwide Church to Take Down Sign
HARLEM A city-issued violation could force the controversial Atlah Worldwide Church to take down its controversial sign which often displays homophobic and racist messages after multiple failed attempts by critics who tried to pressure the church to put a stop to what they called hate speech.
The church on 123rd Street and Lenox Avenue which is a landmarked building was hit with five violations Thursday for altering the structure without permits, according to the Landmarks Preservation Commission
Atlahs infamous sign, which Pastor James David Manning uses to broadcast messages like Jesus would stone homos, and Obama has released the homo demons on the black man, was installed without the commission's authorization, spokeswoman Damaris Olivo said.
The violations were issued because the sign was erected without approval, not because of the content of the messages it displayed, Olivo said.
.
.
.
(more at above link)
----------------------------------
This horrible church is only a few blocks from my apartment.
While the issue with discriminatory messages is a common theme, the difficulties in addressing Atlah vs the message on the MTA buses are not the same. They each have their own different challenges because Atlah is private property and a church and the MTA buses are public property.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)So, with those credentials, a journalist of the caliber of Elisabeth Hasselbeck or Lara Logan.
Sadly for her, Geller is uglier than sin, inside and out. At least Hasselbeck and Logan have a modest measure of sex appeal.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Mass Murderer.
After the notoriety of being an inspiration for that mass murderer, she disappeared for a while.
I had hoped we would never hear from her again.
If White Supremacists want to take on their counterpart extremist fundamentalists, let her go to the ME rather than putting the lives of people here in jeopardy.
She led the anti Muslim rallies in NYC to stop the building of the Muslim Community Center.
She is a hate monger.
Nothing more and she got what she wanted.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts)People want to talk about what she did as championing free speech. Technically, free speech protects what she did, but that's not what's motivating her.
She is a vile, vile, vile human being.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Crazy!
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I'm sure she would have been disappointed had her event not attracted this incident.