Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:42 PM May 2015

Six debates? That's more than enough for Bernie to clinch the nomination...

...if he's the best candidate.

Democratic primary voters are a smart bunch. They are extremely well-informed, unlike their Republican counterparts.

If Bernie truly is much better than Hillary and the other candidates, the voters will be able to see it and they will give him the nod.

May the best candidate win.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Six debates? That's more than enough for Bernie to clinch the nomination... (Original Post) Cali_Democrat May 2015 OP
O'Malley is the one complaining pscot May 2015 #1
I just noticed a lot of Bernie supporters here expressing concern over the number of debates Cali_Democrat May 2015 #2
I'm not concerned about Bernie in the least. In any debate he's coming out on top. Autumn May 2015 #4
I don't have a problem with the 6 sanctioned debates as long as octoberlib May 2015 #3
+1. The exclusivity clause is the problem. winter is coming May 2015 #5
Possibly unconstitutional pscot May 2015 #6
No. It's not unconstitutional; just skeevy. n/t winter is coming May 2015 #8
Best case scenario; aspirant May 2015 #7
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. I just noticed a lot of Bernie supporters here expressing concern over the number of debates
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:09 PM
May 2015

I wanted to quell those fears.

Autumn

(45,046 posts)
4. I'm not concerned about Bernie in the least. In any debate he's coming out on top.
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:19 PM
May 2015

I want to hear Hillary.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
3. I don't have a problem with the 6 sanctioned debates as long as
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:16 PM
May 2015

candidates can participate in other debates. I don't like the exclusivity clause. Also will they be allowed to appear at roundtables and other events featuring multiple candidates discussing the issues? I need more information.



From Kos: Debates may have had an outsized level of influence in campaigns from the '60s to the late '90s, but we live in a different world now. Stop whining about the old rules, and learn to play by the new ones. Six debates is more than enough for candidates to differentiate themselves, particularly after they've used new media tools to introduce themselves to primary voters.

That said, the DNC is wrong on one major aspect: the rules allow it to bar any candidate from attending its sanctioned events if they participate in any other debates. That blatantly undemocratic clause needs to be ignored by all candidates. If you don't want to call it a "debate," then fine, but if candidates want to participate in joint forums, hangouts, gatherings, symposiums, roundtables, or whatever, that's their right as Americans and fuck the DNC for trying to squash it. Hillary can show up to those additional events if she wants to. Or not. No one is forcing anything on anyone.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/06/1382849/-Six-debates-is-fair-but-the-DNC-isn-t-off-the-hook?detail=twitter_sf

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Six debates? That's more ...