General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInvincible? Poll: Walker, Bush lead Clinton head-to-head in New Hampshire
Two potential 2016 GOP contenders, Gov. Scott Walker (Wis.) and former Gov. Jeb Bush (Fla.) lead Hillary Clinton in a hypothetical general election match-up in New Hampshire, according to a new poll.
Walker is up 4 percentage points, 39 percent to 35 percent, while Bush leads by 3 percentage points, 37 percent to 34 percent, in the poll released Wednesday by the Nelson A. Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College.
If the Democratic primary field remains comparatively uncompetitive, Clinton will glide to a primary victory in New Hampshire as her core Democratic voter base is about as solid as one could hope for more than nine months from the New Hampshire primary," Ronald Shaiko, the surveys director, said in a release.
Her electoral success in November of 2016 in New Hampshire, however, is far from certain," he cautioned.
In head-to-head match-ups, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) tied with Clinton, while Gov. Chris Christie (R-N.J.) trailed by 2 percentage points, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) by 3 points, and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) by more than 10 points. All of the results were within the 5-percentage-point margin of error, except for Cruz.
<snip>
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/241189-poll-walker-and-bush-lead-clinton-in-new-hampshire
Cue the claims of it's from the right wing, the name of the joint is the Nelson Rockefeller Center, etc.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)then it has none
i guess it is possible they polled a very red group or area
that is the only way it is possible
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)But that's how I feel about all polls I don't agree with.
cali
(114,904 posts)I do.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)My point is nationally Hillary would be way ahead of any of them
cali
(114,904 posts)It's purple but lots of folks here insist that it's blue. and we really, really need NH.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)the "Live Free or Die" business kinda brought out the libertarians in force a few years (OK, decades) ago.
I don't know if that means anything, but the Hamsters (or whatever they call themselves) seem to be pretty idiosyncratic politically.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)To gauge the current political landscape in New Hampshire regarding the 2016
presidential election, respondents were asked whom they would support in matchups
between potential Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and the following Republican
nominees: Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Mike
Huckabee, and Ted Cruz. The results are presented in the figure below.
http://rockefeller.dartmouth.edu/library/2015nhstatepoll.pdf
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)In the poll the OP cited they comprise 48% of the electorate:
There were slightly more men than women in the sample, 52 percent to 48 percent.
Something is incongruous.
Link to all N.H. general election polls:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/nh/new_hampshire_bush_vs_clinton-4114.html#polls
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)You really have to wonder what's going on when the 2 most recent Dartmouth polls shift from Clinton +10 to Bush +3 in the space of a week.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Seriously, this is getting pathetic.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I, for one, really always want to see Democrats polling better than Republicans. Especially Walker.
cali
(114,904 posts)favorite. I've also said for quite some time that I think there's a good chance she won't win the Presidency. It soes not make me happy. But I consider the determination to nominate her that been ongoing for over 10 years, a big mistake.
former9thward
(31,970 posts)But I guess it was done before he got in officially. NH would be a good test because it is next door to VT so I would guess the voters there would have pretty good name i.d. of him there. It is too early for good name i.d. nationally for Sanders.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I have to call bullshit on that.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Dems should just cede the 2016 election....because....of a single poll conducted in a tiny state a year and a half before the general election.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Try harder.
cali
(114,904 posts)yawn at the me, me, me truman posts.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)match ups mean anything right now.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Outlier
beaglelover
(3,465 posts)carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)nothing to ROFL about
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Good grief.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But I am more than confident in saying she is the favorite to become our next POTUS:
http://www.predictwise.com/politics/2016president
http://www.oddsshark.com/entertainment/us-presidential-odds-2016-futures
undeterred
(34,658 posts)All his baggage will be exposed and he will be despised.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)is ... too early to predict squat. They start to matter 6 months out. Right now...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)but they can be useful to campaigners as feedback for steering the campaign.