Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:32 AM May 2015

Bernie Sanders, at least in the past, would have accepted Super Pac Money

I guess he is the practical sort of guy...

But in a sign of the times, even Sanders says he couldn’t rule out accepting help from a super PAC if push came to shove. In an interview in his Burlington office earlier this week, Vermont’s junior senator told Fair Game that if faced with a super-PAC-financed opponent this fall, a Sanders-supported super PAC is “something we would look at. But I hope we’re not going to have to.”

Sanders is up for reelection in November. So far, he’s running unopposed. But he’s amassed a war chest of close to $4 million, he says, in the event a well-financed challenger emerges.

“There is no member of the United States Senate that Wall Street, the oil companies, the coal companies, the military-industrial complex would like to defeat more than me,” Sanders says, before adding, “I think it’s not going to happen. So I think that’s kind of a hypothetical question that I’m not going to have to deal with. But we can chat about it if, six months from now, many, many millions of dollars are coming in attacking me.”

Sanders says he and other anti-super-PAC politicians face the same dilemma as Obama.



snip....

“What [Obama] is saying is, ‘Fine, I dislike the idea of a super PAC. But what do you really want me to do? You want me to allow billionaires and corporate leaders to spend huge sums of money against me and I don’t have the ability to respond?’” Sanders says. “You could say that holding up the correct moral position would generate a lot of public support. Politically it might be good for him. On the other hand, he will argue that he doesn’t want to be in a position where he’s outspent two or three to one.”


http://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/a-bernie-sanders-super-pac/Content?oid=2183600
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders, at least in the past, would have accepted Super Pac Money (Original Post) boston bean May 2015 OP
Smart man. You can't move your agenda if you don't win OKNancy May 2015 #1
He is willing to sell out his principles... but will his supporters forgive him? boston bean May 2015 #2
"We discuss issues. They discuss us." merrily May 2015 #15
Discussing Bernie Sanders and his record is discussing the issues. boston bean May 2015 #16
Yes, but discussing his supporters is not. merrily May 2015 #17
Discussing how is supporters may respond to this is off limits? boston bean May 2015 #18
That's not what I said. I repeated an observation. I did not make a prohibition, nor could I. merrily May 2015 #21
Let me know when he takes millions in income for giving speeches to Wallstreet banksters think May 2015 #3
I guess Bernie Sanders thought he could, if needed. boston bean May 2015 #4
Let's discuss who actually does and did rather than speculate and play games shall we? think May 2015 #6
When he himself states he would if needed, and then his criticisms of those who do, boston bean May 2015 #7
Hillary has taken millions in donations AND income from the banksters. Bernie has not. think May 2015 #9
One might also ask Sherman A1 May 2015 #11
That is most certainly worth asking. What legislation have the two candidates introduced to think May 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author smokey nj May 2015 #5
Hillary has been talking campaign finance reform, but I don't see her rejecting $$$$. Vinca May 2015 #8
And there are pictures of him masticating. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #10
This makes me more confident in him. geek tragedy May 2015 #12
Still equating all super pac money as equal to what Goldman Sachs did is ludicrous at best. think May 2015 #13
"would have" are weasel words meaning I have no fucking clue. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #19
Do you think you could be any more bratter? Bonobo May 2015 #20

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
1. Smart man. You can't move your agenda if you don't win
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:38 AM
May 2015

and you can't win if faced with an onslaught of Republican PAC money.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
2. He is willing to sell out his principles... but will his supporters forgive him?
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:41 AM
May 2015

He is in quite a quandary with this.

I love Bernie Sanders... but he is not the most perfect candidate either. No candidate is.

I wish his supporters luck with their quest. It will be interesting to see if this bothers any of them...

 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. Let me know when he takes millions in income for giving speeches to Wallstreet banksters
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:41 AM
May 2015

that were at the heart of America's economic meltdown.

Banks that took worthless mortgages, bundled them, and sold them as AAA investments while on the other side betting against those same worthless investments.

How would a candidate that takes that kind of money be in any position to make sure those entities don't screw Americans again?

Why are these banks still allowed to exist if they practice such deceitful and immoral behavior?

What candidate in good faith could take millions in income and millions in donations from those banks that acted in such unscrupulous ways?


boston bean

(36,221 posts)
7. When he himself states he would if needed, and then his criticisms of those who do,
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:45 AM
May 2015

it becomes newsworthy and fairgame....

 

think

(11,641 posts)
9. Hillary has taken millions in donations AND income from the banksters. Bernie has not.
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:51 AM
May 2015

Bernie is working to get these entities under control but here you play games with possible scenarios that don't exist.

HAVE FUN with that.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
11. One might also ask
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:55 AM
May 2015

what legislation each introduced or supported to promote both campaign reform and or financial reform while in the Senate?

Granted bills do not always become law, yet making efforts at reform seems to me to be a place to make judgements about how candidates view issues and the importance of those issues to them.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
14. That is most certainly worth asking. What legislation have the two candidates introduced to
Thu May 7, 2015, 08:09 AM
May 2015

support campaign and finance reform? (Stated rhetorically. Not as a direct question to the you. Sorry.)

Response to boston bean (Original post)

Vinca

(50,267 posts)
8. Hillary has been talking campaign finance reform, but I don't see her rejecting $$$$.
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:47 AM
May 2015

It's billion dollar politics and Bernie is the poor church mouse. If it takes super PAC money for him to have a chance, I say take it.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
10. And there are pictures of him masticating.
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:53 AM
May 2015

Right on the Internet.

BTW, you and I have a different understanding of the phrase "look at".

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. This makes me more confident in him.
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:55 AM
May 2015

That he's not someone willing to lose over maintaining purity points.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
13. Still equating all super pac money as equal to what Goldman Sachs did is ludicrous at best.
Thu May 7, 2015, 07:59 AM
May 2015

There are degrees of corporate influence and malfeasance....

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
20. Do you think you could be any more bratter?
Thu May 7, 2015, 08:38 AM
May 2015

I mean, to me, a brat is someone that acts out and stamps their feet.

Do you think you are being mature?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders, at least ...