General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBig appetite: Christie buys $300K of food & booze with NJ expense account
By Mark Lagerkvist | New Jersey Watchdog
Chris Christies expense account tells a story of appetite and ambition, one that pits government waste versus the New Jersey governors waistline.
Christie spent $360,000 from his state allowance during his five years in office. More than 80 percent of that money, or $300,000, was used to buy food, alcohol and desserts, according to a New Jersey Watchdog analysis of records released by the governors office.
In addition to his $175,000 a year salary, the governor receives $95,000 a year in expense advances, paid quarterly by the state. In the state budget, it is listed as an allowance of funds not otherwise appropriated and used for official receptions on behalf of the state, the operation of an official residence, for other expenses.
While Christie returns surplus funds to the state each year, Treasury officials say he does not submit receipts or accounting for the public monies he spends. The governors ledger, obtained from Christie under the Open Public Records Act, offers a rare, if partial glimpse of a controversial expense account shrouded in secrecy.
more
http://watchdog.org/217942/christie-nj-expense-account/
Oink oink.....
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)There's a pun there I will resist from making.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Initech
(100,064 posts)brentspeak
(18,290 posts)Watchdog.org is a Koch-affiliated, tea-bagger website which exists to push charter school propaganda, municipal worker pension "reform" (i.e. welching on pension obligations), election stealing via voter ID scams, and advocacy of tea bagger candidates. The only reason watchdog.org is running this anti-Christie article is because the website is otherwise pimping for tea-bag favorite Scott Walker. In fact, the site is currently running a series of near-defamatory "watchdog" articles targeting the prosecutors of the Wisconsin "John Doe" investigations.
I'm not questioning that Christie has literally eaten his way through office on NJ taxpayer's dime; there's no question he's corrupt. But this is the wrong source to direct people to.
Response to brentspeak (Reply #5)
n2doc This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to n2doc (Reply #6)
brentspeak This message was self-deleted by its author.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Mail Message
On Mon May 11, 2015, 12:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
So you know how to use Google, do you?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6655491
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Unnecessary insinuation that the author of the OP is a teabagger.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon May 11, 2015, 12:43 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: the post clearly says "tea bagger WEBSITE" criticises the source not the poster
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh FFS! n2doc smarted off about detesting "folks" and insinuating that brentspeak was too stupid to know about Google and then turns around and alerts on what I consider to be rather lame compared to his own comment. Let's grow up, children, you're presumably adults so act like it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OP should just link to a non-teabagger site. RW sources have been frowned upon if not against tos on DU since i started reading in 2003
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Without looking at the context, it seems like a straightforward question.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think he's calling the poster a teabagger. Asking a question in a pretty nasty way but not accusing
Brentspeak could sure be nicer about it. But he's also responding to a not very nice reply. There are differences in sources and it's a legitimate concern.
Damn! Just everybody chill the fuck out
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)You can't fake credit card receipts.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)malaise
(268,949 posts)a fat cat. He's the definition of a fat cat.