Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon May 11, 2015, 10:50 AM May 2015

Big appetite: Christie buys $300K of food & booze with NJ expense account

By Mark Lagerkvist | New Jersey Watchdog

Chris Christie’s expense account tells a story of appetite and ambition, one that pits government waste versus the New Jersey governor’s waistline.

Christie spent $360,000 from his state allowance during his five years in office. More than 80 percent of that money, or $300,000, was used to buy food, alcohol and desserts, according to a New Jersey Watchdog analysis of records released by the governor’s office.

In addition to his $175,000 a year salary, the governor receives $95,000 a year in expense advances, paid quarterly by the state. In the state budget, it is listed as “an allowance of funds not otherwise appropriated and used for official receptions on behalf of the state, the operation of an official residence, for other expenses.”

While Christie returns surplus funds to the state each year, Treasury officials say he does not submit receipts or accounting for the public monies he spends. The governor’s ledger, obtained from Christie under the Open Public Records Act, offers a rare, if partial glimpse of a controversial expense account shrouded in secrecy.

more
http://watchdog.org/217942/christie-nj-expense-account/

Oink oink.....

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big appetite: Christie buys $300K of food & booze with NJ expense account (Original Post) n2doc May 2015 OP
"Christie buys $300K of food & booze." DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #1
...and it appears he sampled a lot of it personally...especially the desserts. libdem4life May 2015 #2
Does he oink, too? closeupready May 2015 #3
I wonder how much of that went to Jerry Jones? Initech May 2015 #4
There has to be a more appropriate source for this brentspeak May 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author n2doc May 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author brentspeak May 2015 #7
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service ChisolmTrailDem May 2015 #8
I'm actually going to stick with the source and here's why LynneSin May 2015 #11
That's a whole lot of Krispy Kremes! KamaAina May 2015 #9
And some folks here think it's politically incorrect to call him malaise May 2015 #10

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
5. There has to be a more appropriate source for this
Mon May 11, 2015, 11:38 AM
May 2015

Watchdog.org is a Koch-affiliated, tea-bagger website which exists to push charter school propaganda, municipal worker pension "reform" (i.e. welching on pension obligations), election stealing via voter ID scams, and advocacy of tea bagger candidates. The only reason watchdog.org is running this anti-Christie article is because the website is otherwise pimping for tea-bag favorite Scott Walker. In fact, the site is currently running a series of near-defamatory "watchdog" articles targeting the prosecutors of the Wisconsin "John Doe" investigations.

I'm not questioning that Christie has literally eaten his way through office on NJ taxpayer's dime; there's no question he's corrupt. But this is the wrong source to direct people to.

Response to brentspeak (Reply #5)

Response to n2doc (Reply #6)

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
8. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mon May 11, 2015, 12:44 PM
May 2015

Mail Message
On Mon May 11, 2015, 12:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

So you know how to use Google, do you?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6655491

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Unnecessary insinuation that the author of the OP is a teabagger.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon May 11, 2015, 12:43 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: the post clearly says "tea bagger WEBSITE" criticises the source not the poster
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh FFS! n2doc smarted off about detesting "folks" and insinuating that brentspeak was too stupid to know about Google and then turns around and alerts on what I consider to be rather lame compared to his own comment. Let's grow up, children, you're presumably adults so act like it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OP should just link to a non-teabagger site. RW sources have been frowned upon if not against tos on DU since i started reading in 2003
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Without looking at the context, it seems like a straightforward question.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think he's calling the poster a teabagger. Asking a question in a pretty nasty way but not accusing

Brentspeak could sure be nicer about it. But he's also responding to a not very nice reply. There are differences in sources and it's a legitimate concern.

Damn! Just everybody chill the fuck out

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

malaise

(268,949 posts)
10. And some folks here think it's politically incorrect to call him
Mon May 11, 2015, 03:30 PM
May 2015

a fat cat. He's the definition of a fat cat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big appetite: Christie bu...