General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAdoring a politician renders the adorer blind
to facts. Trusting a politician 100%, forges a bulwark against critical thinking. The two together are like a powerful drug.
Adoring, or loving, if you prefer, and trusting a politician is not a good fit with democracy.
.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)I actually find that mindset a bit frightening. My thoughts keep returning to historical examples.
eloydude
(376 posts)Idiots!
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)I had intended to write an OP this morning saying, "while I personally support the President on this trade pact, I feel it was good to see independent thinking by all parties involved. If all issues were debated without political or knee jerk reactions, our country would be making great progress, instead of internally com busting."
IOW, let's talk about it.
Good post.
cali
(114,904 posts)With you about it! As, I'm pecking away on my tablet, now is not a great time.
And thanks
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Let everyone discuss and evaluate before doing anything that may come back to bite us. No one person has all the answers. That was my point.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)I found myself going down that road of which you speak, with Bernie Sanders. I had to wake myself up to reality, and begin the process of asking the questions.
cali
(114,904 posts)Clinton or anyone else
tblue
(16,350 posts)not politicians. I love Bernie Sanders, but I'll be the first to tell you if I think he's wrong about something. And I'll tell him too.
First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...but it should be. I remember the horrible sense of loss and hopelessness in 1968 when RFK was assassinated. I was only 15, but I had invested a lot in him, and defended him strongly against family members who supported McCarthy. Then came Los Angeles, and I felt a sense of despair--that I, America itself, were Sisyphus, and the stone had run down the hill. We've been trying to push it back up ever since, and investing in a personality, seeing them as a savior, is very tempting. But I have to admit, resisting the temptation has become easier the older I've gotten...:-/...hero worship is for the young, or should be...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I've never seen anyone agree with anyone 100% of the time. I'm highly skeptical this phenomenon exists.
PatrickforO
(14,559 posts)Because if they don't, they are put to death or at the least sent to some camp for a painful and humiliating 'reeducation' process.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)you've never been in the Hillary Clinton room here on DU.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Hillary Clinton is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)though I do trust some more than others.
All politicians have their faults; there is no perfect candidate.
mia
(8,360 posts)Thank you.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How folks. Dooo Iiiit, I know you can, I know you can, Dooo Iiiiit!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Rendering them in stone, metal, or other form of permanence:
Done outside, handy place to keep our pigeons.
Done in our houses; handy place to store coats and hats.
Done in our minds, dangerous place to rest our intelligence.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)"I will tell you the truth" or any variation, you know that this politician is about to lie...
Among RePukians, the phrase would be "I swear to God"...
tblue
(16,350 posts)Moi?" If that's the entire defense, it's not much of a defense.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Though you can love someone and still be able to see the mistakes or worse
It's blind trust that is just plain stupid. Most people can't even trust themselves in some situations. Trusting a politician and never even questioning anything, is just plain dumb
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)You put the face of the President on an animal. What kind of ridiculous pictures are you going to make of other Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton? How is this helping achieve our goal (as stated in the DU Terms of Service) of getting more Democrats elected?
If you have differences of opinion on policy or issues with any of the Democrats, just state them. Don't stoop to this kind of disrespect.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Oh and I sure as hell want Democrats to win the Elections, so get lost with your ridiculous assertions and pathetic thinly veiled threats by mentioning the TOS.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)2.) I read the OP.
What you posted was just plain wrong. What animal pictures are you going to make of other Democrats? Again, the question: How is this helping to elect Democrats?
Oh, and by the way, I wasn't making "pathetic thinly veiled threats", I was trying to remind you of the main purpose of DU. If I wanted to alert on your post, I just would have, plain and simple.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)You don't have an answer to the question, "How is this helping to elect Democrats?", so you resort to name-calling.
Once again, from the top:
"Everyone here on DU needs to work together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government. If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side."
Call me any name that you like. Your insults demonstrate your lack of confidence in your contentions.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)That's news to me.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)By letting them know in no uncertain terms that certain behaviors in office - such as Obama's with respect to the TPP - will not be tolerated.
Exactly.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Of course you sometimes wonder that.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Good one.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)PatrickforO
(14,559 posts)This holds true even with iconic figures such as Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, not to mention modern day heroes like Obama, Warren and even Sanders. In the same way a lock keeps an honest person honest, the ability to think critically keeps our politicians accountable.
gordianot
(15,234 posts)He had many faults. Over the years I have learned them well. At the idealistic age of 16 he gave me some hope for the future. I miss that, part of me is still stuck in the tragic year of 1968 including the death of Martin Luther King. The decades since that time have not been filled with a lot of hope but I have lived and prospered. I had some hope for Barack Obama who has faced tremendous obstruction from the wanton ignorance and the domestic terrorism, corruption of the Republican Party (some fault lies with Democrats). Current events have caught up with that, the American Middle Class is in trouble and the secrecy surrounding the current trade deal by Barack Obama is profoundly disturbing. Good God Senators are allowed to only to look at it no notes and then make decisions that will impact this country for decades. Where is the criticism that legislators vote on bills they do not read? American Democracy is on the critical list this week. My greatest fear we are on the precipice of another 1968. I do fear for my children and grandchildren. I will still hold on to Robert Kennedy as a symbol of lost idealism and have lost trust long ago.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Our corporate government is incessantly focused on selling things to us, including policy, and they pour untold numbers of tax dollars into dishonest propaganda to do it.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)Sometimes good politicians make bad policy choices but it doesn't mean you dislike or disrespect them.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)They won't get it. Now quit hating on PBO!
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)In their delusion they see themselves as some kind of police officers with the holly duty to correct the "disrespectful". Sorry but respect have to be earned and it can easily be lost. Yes, those freaks are creepy indeed.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Come on now, give us some more examples of your pictures of prominent Democrats pictured as animals. Let's see one of FDR, Harry Truman, Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, Bernie Sanders. We can judge what's creepy from there. You have to be fair about this, or you could be accused of "adoring" or "idolizing" some Democrats over others!
Oh, and in case the subject has not turned to horticulture, you word you are looking for in your attack would be "holy", not "holly".
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)and congratulate you for your self-scrutiny.
cali
(114,904 posts)And then is nothing new here. I've said the same thing for years. My posts give lie to your feeble claim.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)The guy got caught smoking crack on camera while he was the mayor of D.C., went to prison, got out and was elected to the city council almost immediately before eventually becoming mayor again. That's a definite cult of personality.
FSogol
(45,452 posts)If his constituents loved him, it was because they could pick up the phone to his office and get help whether it was filling a pothole or getting a summer job for their teen. When the Feds entrapped him, most of his followers saw it as vindication of the haves vs the havenots issues that he preached.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Maybe he wasn't such a bad guy (for a politician).
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)it is impossible for me to talk to them anymore...
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Why is it impossible for you to talk to me?
alarimer
(16,245 posts)All of these issues: the TPP, drones, etc. would have everyone up in arms, if Bush were the one doing them.
But Obama can do no wrong, according to his fan base. He walks on water, it seems.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)witness the "Obama's a monstrous sexist' brigade here at DU.
cali
(114,904 posts)but I don't know that it stems from blind rage. I think it more likely that it comes frustration and yes, anger- which is not synonymous with blind rage. I know you don't engage in what the OP describes, but I've seen a lot of it; a lot of "we should trust the President 100%". That does shock me because it's such an abdication of critical thinking. I'm not claiming that everyone who opposes President Obama is free from being blinded, and I recognize that some of the people advocating trust are mostly being defensive, but I do find it difficult to understand why anyone would hold such an opinion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)with zeal and with passion when the chips are down.
Rex
(65,616 posts)One way or the other, that is human nature and can't really be argued against. I've seen people say the more others bash HRC, the more they support her. Same for Sanders.
It becomes a team vs. team mentality and the most petty issue gets thrown out like raw meat to the lions.
Good point. Probably best never to have faith or rage against someone else, it will bias your opinion guaranteed.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Equally irrational.
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The corollary is also true (if yet inconvenient).
cali
(114,904 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Hate is an antonym of adore. Not many would be able to claim this is simple frustration. It is hate. Absolute blind hate.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6659269
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Not just politicians, it's folly to adore any public figure.
treestar
(82,383 posts)is getting out of hand. If she says it, it's true.
boston bean
(36,219 posts)Or is this just some errant thought you wanted to share?