Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:00 PM May 2015

Hillary Clinton’s rope-a-dope approach to Obama's trade agenda highlights her vulnerability

President Obama, so often cool and cautious in his language, gave a full-throated roar on trade last week, saying that Sen. Elizabeth Warren was " absolutely wrong " in her criticism of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and that "her arguments don't stand the test of fact and scrutiny ."

I think Obama is right about the TPP, but there's a larger point here about leadership. Governing is a contact sport.

<snip>

Which raises a question: What does Hillary Clinton believe about the Trans-Pacific Partnership or the Iran nuclear deal? You would assume that she's supportive because she helped get both agreements started. But she has been a study in reticence — a trimmer checking the political winds, rather than a leader.

<snip>

Clinton is still running, but she could take a political lesson from Obama. She needs to be a fighter. Avoiding the issues will only reinforce the sense that she is a hollow candidate. She should be taking credit for the good provisions in the TPP, not hedging her bets. She may be ready to run, but is she ready to lead?

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clintons-rope-a-dope-approach-to-obamas-trade-agenda-highlights-her-vulnerability-2015-5#ixzz3aEPKGSC8

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton’s rope-a-dope approach to Obama's trade agenda highlights her vulnerability (Original Post) cali May 2015 OP
Sounds like some one doesn't know what "rope-a-dope" means? JoePhilly May 2015 #1
But (from the article)... Cooley Hurd May 2015 #2
The article claims that tactic is used because of some "vulnerability". JoePhilly May 2015 #3
Not exclusively because of "vulnerability"... Cooley Hurd May 2015 #4
Sorry, its a weak analogy. JoePhilly May 2015 #5
Per your specs... Cooley Hurd May 2015 #6
Per having watched Mohammd Ali actually fight using it. JoePhilly May 2015 #7
What about non-Ali fighters? Cooley Hurd May 2015 #10
Is she a "loyal" Democrat? If so, loyal to which side of the party? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #8
Yawn trumad May 2015 #9
burp, fart, knuckle crack, sneeze AND yawn. cali May 2015 #11
Hah..... trumad May 2015 #12
yawn cali May 2015 #13

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
1. Sounds like some one doesn't know what "rope-a-dope" means?
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:05 PM
May 2015

The author should look it up if they want to sound credible.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
2. But (from the article)...
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:10 PM
May 2015

"But she has been a study in reticence — a trimmer checking the political winds, rather than a leader".

Rope-a-dope means to hang back and wait, vs waging a full frontal assault. By the statement I've quoted above, that seems to be what Secretary Clinton is doing...

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
3. The article claims that tactic is used because of some "vulnerability".
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:15 PM
May 2015

Is that why Mohammad Ali used that tactic? Because he was "vulnerable"?

I think not.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
7. Per having watched Mohammd Ali actually fight using it.
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:36 PM
May 2015

I understand that the anti-Hillary authors struggle to keep their stuff from getting stale.

So this will happen from time to time to be sure.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
10. What about non-Ali fighters?
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:39 PM
May 2015

You're focusing on "The Greatest" using this tactic, but ignoring the thousands of pugilists who used it to overcome a stronger fighter.

...and what makes you think the author is "anti-Hillary"? Maybe they're pointing out a salient fact? Are you so pro-Hillary that you cannot fathom criticism of her?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
8. Is she a "loyal" Democrat? If so, loyal to which side of the party?
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:38 PM
May 2015

No doubt, she hopes it will all go away before she's forced to takes sides and then try to be on both sides. Bill was better at it.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
11. burp, fart, knuckle crack, sneeze AND yawn.
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:41 PM
May 2015


hey, tru, saw you whinging about someone stalking you in your threads......

I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the afternoon.
 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
12. Hah.....
Fri May 15, 2015, 03:22 PM
May 2015

You post a gazillion negative posts a day about Hillary. Ain't very hard bumping into you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton’s rope-a-...