General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou can’t stop the trade machine
You cant stop the trade machineby Fareed Zakaria at the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/you-cant-stop-the-trade-machine/2015/05/14/208d74a2-fa6e-11e4-a13c-193b1241d51a_story.html
"SNIP..................
For those who worry that, after the TPP, the United States would have to compete against low-wage countries its too late. As Zachary Karabell notes, we are already living in a free-trade world. The average tariff in the developed world is about 3 percent. And in the past three decades, developing countries have cut their tariffs substantially as well. The World Trade Organization notes that Chinas average is less than 10 percent today, down from about 40 percent in 1985.
......
The technology revolution has accelerated globalization, as digitized products can be sent across borders at minimal cost. And almost everything is getting digitized in some sense, as even the taxi industry is being reshaped by companies such as Uber that use big data and smart software. How would you stop the globalization of digital goods and services? Could you pass a law that says that a lab in New York cannot send your X-ray to a doctor in Chennai for her to read and interpret? Can you prevent an accountant in Manila from preparing your tax returns and sending them to you via e-mail? Whatever you think of these forces, they can be resisted in some places for some time, but look around the world they keep on rolling.
The United States has one of the worlds most open economies. Any trade deal like the TPP is going to open other economies the Japanese or Vietnamese, for example far more than the American. And the nature of the opening and the new rules will reflect American ideals and interests.
......
If something similar were to happen with the TPP in Asia, the effects would be even broader. The world we live in is one of rising new powers and declining old norms. The struggle is on to write new rules for trade, cybersecurity, intellectual property and much more. Lets hope we dont look back 20 years from now, under new rules written by China, and wish we had been more assertive when we had the chance.
.................SNIP"
applegrove
(118,503 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)"This is a six-year bill," he added. "So what I've said to my members, if we want the next Republican president, who we hope will be sworn in less than two years from now, to have a chance to do trade agreements with the rest of the world, this bill is about that president as well as this one."
I'd also mention that their corporate masters (donors) want this bad.
cali
(114,904 posts)pov doesn't capture reality
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)we're not as bad as the other guys.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)is his home country of... INDIA.
Where a lot of the IT is going...
Though he has a point, but I would modify it, we also live in a world of a declining world power, that be us.
msongs
(67,371 posts)he cannot plead defense by using american local, state,and federal laws that are overruled by international corporate tribunals sponsored by barack obama?
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)The opening of Japan for American exports is.....huge.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Its the loss of national sovereignty to regulate corporate behavior, the inability to punish malfeasance in order to protect local citizens from harmful corporate actions thats the worst of the TPP.
Then theres the unlimited copyrights it grants, and the guarantees of perpetual profits that no TPP signatory can ever challenge, but those are but a few of the things that are bad about the "trade" bill that isnt.