Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe American-Made Child Army in Africa
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/30240-the-american-made-child-army-in-africaApproximately 13,000 children have been recruited into armed groups in South Sudan, according to the United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF). In addition, about 400,000 youngsters have been forced out of school due to the civil war that has been flaring and simmering there for almost a year and a half. How so many children came to be affected by the conflict and why so many of them find themselves serving in the national army, the main rebel force, and other militias needs to be explained. It has much to do with civil wars that started in the 1950s and lasted for the better part of five decades, pitting rebels in the south against the government in the north of what was then a single country: Sudan.
Other factors include the 2005 peace deal that led to an independent South Sudan and transformed a guerrilla force into a national military, the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army or SPLA; a rural culture in which cows are king because they are currency and young boys are armed to defend against cattle raids, as well as to conduct them; and an armed grudge match between political rivals representing different tribal groups in South Sudan that began in December 2013. Add all of this together and any tangible recent progress toward ridding South Sudan of the scourge of child soldiers has been obliterated.
Oh yes, and into that mix you would also have to factor the United States, a country that, as then U.S. Senator, now Secretary of State John Kerry put it, helped midwife South Sudan into existence.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 525 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The American-Made Child Army in Africa (Original Post)
eridani
May 2015
OP
1939
(1,683 posts)1. Since the northern Sudanese were terrorizing the southern Sudnaese
Diplomatically helping the southern Sudanese gaining independence was seen as a "good thing". South Sudan's failure politically to is hardly the fault of the US (unless we were supposed to make it as "protectorate" and guide them for forty years until they were "mature enough" for real independence).
eridani
(51,907 posts)2. If intervention makes it worse, then why do it? n/t
1939
(1,683 posts)3. Sometimes you don't know ahead of time.
There was significant sentiment on the left for sending a US armed force to Darfur. How would that have worked out?
What would have been the consequences of the US not getting into World War One? My personal belief is that Germany, Britain, and France would have reached a peace of mutual exhaustion and maybe there would have been no rise of Hitler and the Nazis.