General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDocuments: The TPP is a "Living Agreement". In other words, it can change
<snip>
On November 12, 2011, the leaders of the TPP nations endorsed the TPP Trade Ministers Report to Leaders, Section 5 of which spelled out some of the mutational dangers inherent in the TPP:
(5) Living Agreement
We have agreed to develop the TPP as a living agreement. While we are establishing a state-of-the-art agreement, we want to ensure that we have the ability to update the agreement as appropriate. Therefore, the TPP teams are establishing a structure, institutions, and processes that allow the agreement to evolve in response to developments in trade, technology or other emerging issues and challenges. We envision a continuing joint work program, including new commitments in areas of common interest or to enable us to quickly respond to developments in global trade or technology. At the same time, we remain cognizant of our goal to eventually expand the TPP to include other economies from across the Asia-Pacific region. [Emphasis added.]
The Congressional Research Service, in a study entitled, The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations and Issues for Congress, released on March 20, 2015, notes about this crucial aspect of the TPP, reporting:
A Living Agreement
The TPP has been envisaged as a living agreement, one that is both open to new members willing to sign up to its commitments and open to addressing new issues as they evolve.
<snip>
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/20898-living-evolving-dangers-are-hidden-in-obamatrade-tpp-ttip
It'd be nice and all to believe that this provision provides for improving standards, but at this point you have to be a blithering idiot to believe that.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)the fix is another bigger agreement with similarly unenforceable protections.