Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
Tue May 19, 2015, 05:43 PM May 2015

(HRC) is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and barely more moderate than Bernie Sanders.

A bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)

We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party.

...

Clinton also has a history of very liberal public statements. Clinton rates as a “hard core liberal” per the OnTheIssues.org scale. She is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and barely more moderate than Bernie Sanders. And while Obama is also a “hard core liberal,” Clinton again was rated as more liberal than Obama.

...

http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/hillary-clinton-was-liberal-hillary-clinton-is-liberal/

161 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(HRC) is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and barely more moderate than Bernie Sanders. (Original Post) Dem2 May 2015 OP
"while Obama is also a 'hard core liberal'" hfojvt May 2015 #1
Perspective is a wonderful thing tech3149 May 2015 #15
Liberalism is the new center. Makes sense. JaneyVee May 2015 #21
lol-- no kidding. /nt Marr May 2015 #94
On an American political plane he probably is... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #104
Wait! I thought he was a Muslim socialist! n/t RufusTFirefly May 2015 #126
I agree, but I also believe that our definitions are limited to what we have NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #2
HRC is a war-mongering corporatist. HooptieWagon May 2015 #3
But she is a "Liberal" war-mongering corporatist. That is why Wall St. supports her. Vincardog May 2015 #30
True, she's more "liberal" than McCain or Lindsay Graham. HooptieWagon May 2015 #50
You have to admit she is more liberal than any OTHER republican running. Vincardog May 2015 #54
She's more liberal than Bill and Obama too MaggieD May 2015 #68
Good one! MissDeeds May 2015 #81
The truth hurts. Vincardog May 2015 #89
Yes it does MissDeeds May 2015 #95
That disqualifies her as President to many. darkangel218 May 2015 #91
Bingo!! +1,000! Me too. n/t RufusTFirefly May 2015 #128
+1 840high May 2015 #131
bulloney. Hillary supports the TPP. She doesn't want to raise the income cali May 2015 #4
Tis truth. hifiguy May 2015 #7
Progressive icon FDR rounded up ethnic groups in internment camps. JaneyVee May 2015 #18
I really wish people didn't use anachronistic arguments cali May 2015 #23
Hey, if we're stripping purity credentials... JaneyVee May 2015 #27
do you have any idea what a historically anachronistic argument is? cali May 2015 #65
He also busted union strikes with federal troops uponit7771 May 2015 #26
That 'effin corrupt corporate stooge MaggieD May 2015 #70
That was Truman when he busted the steel strike./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #105
And he was fucking wrong, Wrong, WRONG Jackpine Radical May 2015 #32
Yet he's a progressive icon and ranked #1 by presidential scholars. JaneyVee May 2015 #36
no, President Obama isn't close to being as progressive as FDR cali May 2015 #86
If you want to go down that road... AZ Progressive May 2015 #112
So you keep saying MaggieD May 2015 #101
Welcome to DU.. Fumesucker May 2015 #5
I was looking for a link to the Onion. AtomicKitten May 2015 #38
There seems to be a raft of new DU members pushing the meme that HRC is as liberal as Sen Warren. rhett o rick May 2015 #71
And its only the begining. darkangel218 May 2015 #93
You can say that again - Hillary represents phony liberalism at its worst. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2015 #135
Thanks :) Dem2 May 2015 #58
To quote that well-known philosopher hifiguy May 2015 #6
Yes, and to quote that fighter of injustice... bluesbassman May 2015 #109
Barack Obama and HRC would be seen as center right in most European countries. guillaumeb May 2015 #8
Thanks for posting this. hrmjustin May 2015 #9
ya gotta love the flat out lies in that piece cali May 2015 #12
She said she will wait to hear the full proposal before she makes a judgment. hrmjustin May 2015 #13
she already made a POST state department judgment. It's in her POST cali May 2015 #24
Well we shall see what she says. hrmjustin May 2015 #25
Yep, like standing on a train track and saying you will believe it when the train runs over you. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #137
Based on what? Exilednight May 2015 #10
"When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party" arcane1 May 2015 #11
Yep. Leaders LEAD, they don't follow the herd. nt hifiguy May 2015 #63
Well bless Nate Silvers little blog Autumn May 2015 #14
Welcome to DU. GoneOffShore May 2015 #16
Thank you for the warm welcome. Dem2 May 2015 #52
Don't let them bully you... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #111
Pusilanimous Dem2 May 2015 #116
You should have told him to look at your journal... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #117
I'm new here though I would think one could see what I've posted to date Dem2 May 2015 #118
I can tell... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #119
Yes Dem2 May 2015 #121
Anchovies...yummmm. InAbLuEsTaTe May 2015 #136
Tell Mr. Roarke and Tattoo that I said wassup. TheKentuckian May 2015 #17
What kind of M&Ms does Tattoo like? KamaAina May 2015 #22
. arcane1 May 2015 #28
Sometimes I wish I were part of this culture Jackpine Radical May 2015 #35
Sometimes I wish I didn't understand them :) arcane1 May 2015 #39
Hillary, Bill, Obama, they are all probably more liberal than people know. joshcryer May 2015 #19
You are welcome to post this in the HRC room. hrmjustin May 2015 #20
I'm going to post pro-HRC stuff in GD MaggieD May 2015 #33
And you are always welcome in the HRC room. hrmjustin May 2015 #41
Thank you MaggieD May 2015 #51
My pleasure! Give them hell! hrmjustin May 2015 #53
I bought a new smart phone because I hated Autumn May 2015 #66
And you are well within the TOS Bobbie Jo May 2015 #115
You're more than welcome to post it there Dem2 May 2015 #43
Thanks. i will in a few minutes. hrmjustin May 2015 #45
Done. hrmjustin May 2015 #62
Yeah, sure. TDale313 May 2015 #29
On no - the truth - it burns (some people) MaggieD May 2015 #31
Funny, the only ones I hear calling out Wall Street CharlotteVale May 2015 #34
Well, to be fair, Jackpine Radical May 2015 #40
You can listen to what the right wing media says... MaggieD May 2015 #47
The Big Banks already have their Treasure Trove it was very important. It was called The Bailout. libdem4life May 2015 #55
Which she had nothing to do with MaggieD May 2015 #60
Should have put it like this "It's not the big banks that need relief from Washington, (they already libdem4life May 2015 #78
Then you aren't paying attention, perhaps MaggieD May 2015 #46
I've been paying attention to Clinton's ties to Wall Street since she CharlotteVale May 2015 #114
Not only that, she can get things done. More importantly, she can win. Hoyt May 2015 #37
The question is whether those things she can get done Jackpine Radical May 2015 #42
I think you can rest easy. She'll get a lot of good stuff done, if for no other reason that she can Hoyt May 2015 #44
Agreed MaggieD May 2015 #48
TPP, fracking, and having Serious Conversations abut the petty concerns of the Vast Unwashed? Jackpine Radical May 2015 #49
How very disappointing. I see no exploded heads Autumn May 2015 #56
Cool story bro! 99Forever May 2015 #57
She may be a liberal on social issues but tiredtoo May 2015 #59
Can you provide examples? MaggieD May 2015 #61
No word from her on TPP, Larry Summers tiredtoo May 2015 #67
She has had plenty of words about the TPP MaggieD May 2015 #73
Larry Summers and tiredtoo May 2015 #76
Is she recommending it be voted down? If so, I missed it. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #85
Sorry, that's just not true MaggieD May 2015 #156
here is a link concerning Hillary and TPP tiredtoo May 2015 #158
This is NOT a liberal stance! cascadiance May 2015 #155
Fail. Katashi_itto May 2015 #64
Funny how the new posters here in DU seem to all favor HRC. Maybe my imagination. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #69
Funny how the same people that thought Obama.... MaggieD May 2015 #72
Are you familiar with the website politicalcompass.org? truebluegreen May 2015 #77
Obama ran as a progressive and governed as a Conservative. While HRC may be on the same page rhett o rick May 2015 #80
I think she is dead on re: FP MaggieD May 2015 #84
Neither are liberal on Foreign Policy. Obama is killing people with drones like there is no rhett o rick May 2015 #87
Nah MaggieD May 2015 #97
Nah. Agschmid May 2015 #123
But neither of them are liberal on Foreign Policy are they? When people try to say she is rhett o rick May 2015 #159
. hrmjustin May 2015 #82
That is not true. hrmjustin May 2015 #90
Your argument lacks substance. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #138
So does yours but i am on mirt and see the knew posters daily and can tell you from hrmjustin May 2015 #140
You mean you have access to their ISP's and can tell if they are sock puppets? nm rhett o rick May 2015 #143
No that is the admins job. hrmjustin May 2015 #144
How can MIRT tell who a poster supports? nm rhett o rick May 2015 #147
Because we are required to read their posts when they join. hrmjustin May 2015 #148
Why do you think they are "paid shills"? Agschmid May 2015 #122
Heavens no. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #139
Definitely your imagination. giftedgirl77 May 2015 #157
Hillary's Koch funded DLC attacked liberals Mnpaul May 2015 #74
Koch funded DLC? MaggieD May 2015 #98
Yep Mnpaul May 2015 #102
Oh good lord MaggieD May 2015 #106
Figures Mnpaul May 2015 #113
Yeah but it's still a boogieman for some Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2015 #103
Yeah but 538 is all about numbers and realty. onehandle May 2015 #75
I know she is more liberal than Bill Clinton, and possibly more BreakfastClub May 2015 #79
She isn't progressive when it comes to the economy or the MIC, or foreign policy, or rhett o rick May 2015 #83
Got any links for that? MaggieD May 2015 #99
Yes there are many. But Homey don't play your game. Do you have any links to prove rhett o rick May 2015 #141
Breitbart? Fox News? Townhall.com? The "Factor"?? MaggieD May 2015 #142
If Breitbart said that HRC voted to invade Iraq, would it be untrue? rhett o rick May 2015 #146
Yes, it would make the claims BS MaggieD May 2015 #149
Fracking is destroying our water supplies. She supports fracking so oil companies can rhett o rick May 2015 #150
Do you have solar panels - are you off the grid? MaggieD May 2015 #152
Fracking is win-win for big corporations. The oil companies can get more gas and they can rhett o rick May 2015 #153
You didn't answer the question MaggieD May 2015 #154
You are trying to divert the subject. Fracking is bad for America. It may cost me more rhett o rick May 2015 #160
LOL! n/t Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #88
Though this has been posted the same wrong talking points of denial continues. Thinkingabout May 2015 #92
More like HRC wants to be a liberal but she has lived in the bubble for so long SomethingFishy May 2015 #96
Yup. So is President Obama. lovemydog May 2015 #100
So now Nate Silver's group, who has seldom been wrong about anything, is full of it because Number23 May 2015 #107
That was a mouthful. Agschmid May 2015 #124
Let's remember exactly where Nate Silver was in 2012... giftedgirl77 May 2015 #130
And also remember exactly WHO it was at the time screaming that Big Bad Nate had that agenda Number23 May 2015 #134
The liberals I know don't love big corporations and put business over workers AZ Progressive May 2015 #108
yep 840high May 2015 #132
hoo boy marmar May 2015 #110
hard core liberal frylock May 2015 #120
Source? Agschmid May 2015 #125
politicalcompass.org frylock May 2015 #133
Where only Kucinich and Nader are liberal.... MaggieD May 2015 #145
yeah, they just arbitrarily placed them there.. frylock May 2015 #161
lmfao!!! bunnies May 2015 #127
Construct validity issue MannyGoldstein May 2015 #129
I see a great career for you in stand up DJ13 May 2015 #151

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
15. Perspective is a wonderful thing
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:12 PM
May 2015

I think those "while Obama is also a 'hard core liberal'" types might need to live a few days in my reality.
It ain't so warm and fuzzy when your holding the shitty end of the stick.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
104. On an American political plane he probably is...
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:36 PM
May 2015

Everything is relative... If you compared the Jets to the Harvard Crimson football team they would look like a juggernaut but if you compared them to the Seattle Seahawks or just about any other professional football team they would look pretty much like a joke.






NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
2. I agree, but I also believe that our definitions are limited to what we have
Tue May 19, 2015, 05:47 PM
May 2015

historically seen politically.

A liberal in Northern Europe would favor free higher education paid for by taxation on the rich and corps, and nationalizing of some essentials.

Universal healthcare, guaranteed standard of living, etc.

I will support Hillary if and when Bernie is out of the picture, but I believe there is plenty of room for improvement and almost all of it has to do with Wall STreet and banksters.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
50. True, she's more "liberal" than McCain or Lindsay Graham.
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:51 PM
May 2015

But that's like saying Stalin is more "liberal" than Hitler. I'm just not going to support the "lesser of two evils", when there's so much I disagree with.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
91. That disqualifies her as President to many.
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:48 PM
May 2015

Now that Bernie is running , her centrism is even more evident.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. bulloney. Hillary supports the TPP. She doesn't want to raise the income
Tue May 19, 2015, 05:50 PM
May 2015

cap on SS. She voted for the IWR. She voted for god-awful bankruptcy bill. She won't discuss raising taxes on the wealthiest and in 2008 she rejected it out of hand (maybe she's evolved again) In 2008 she was against drivers licenses for undocumented immigrants and supported deportation- including kids. She didn't support full marriage equality until about 2 minutes ago. Gung ho on military intervention in Libya. Advocated for it in Syria.

Puleez.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
18. Progressive icon FDR rounded up ethnic groups in internment camps.
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:16 PM
May 2015

Killed millions, and lets not even discuss his stance on minorities and marriage equality.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
23. I really wish people didn't use anachronistic arguments
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:19 PM
May 2015

It just demonstrates a lack of knowledge about history and historiography.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
27. Hey, if we're stripping purity credentials...
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:23 PM
May 2015

The least we could do is not be hypocrites about the process.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
65. do you have any idea what a historically anachronistic argument is?
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:07 PM
May 2015

(something I learned at my pappy's knee) Look, you can't take something out of its historical context and try to paste it on to another period in history. This is pretty basic stuff. Arguably you can discuss the interment of Japanese Americans in conjunction with today's world (some historians argue that you can't, but I disagree with them) but you can't throw marriage equality into it, as that wasn't a concept that was in the political dialog at all 75 years ago. And the millions killed in WWII? That's just flat out silly.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
70. That 'effin corrupt corporate stooge
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:18 PM
May 2015

But let's be real. No one passes the liberal puretopian test. At least not for long. Obama was a demigod to this same crowd, and in the blink of an eye he was then the devil.

This is why politicians ignore the extremists. That's the exact reason. They really can't be made happy.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
36. Yet he's a progressive icon and ranked #1 by presidential scholars.
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:41 PM
May 2015

Obama is way more progressive on nearly every issue but today's progressives still not happy.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
86. no, President Obama isn't close to being as progressive as FDR
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:35 PM
May 2015

I doubt you could find a single Presidential historian who would claim that. 2008-2016 is not 1933--1945. Saying President Obama is for marriage equality and FDR wasn't, is pure bunk.\

The New Deal was revolutionary in a way that nothing President Obama has advocated and achieved, is. And I applaud him for the ACA, but it's not New Deal.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
112. If you want to go down that road...
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:50 PM
May 2015

Then your supporting a country that brutalized african americans, committed genocide on Native Americans, and has supported dictator after dictator, that brutalized their own people, in countries around the world throughout at least the past 115 years. Obama himself is supporting the Honduras Government that has allowed gangs to control the streets and has allowed it to become the murder capital of the world. Not to mention the drone war that has killed many innocents and has fanned the flames of terrorism in the middle east.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
71. There seems to be a raft of new DU members pushing the meme that HRC is as liberal as Sen Warren.
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:19 PM
May 2015

This is bull crap of course.

bluesbassman

(19,360 posts)
109. Yes, and to quote that fighter of injustice...
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:44 PM
May 2015

Inigo Montoya: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means".

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
8. Barack Obama and HRC would be seen as center right in most European countries.
Tue May 19, 2015, 05:57 PM
May 2015

And in most of the Americas as well. The political conversation in this country varies from center right to far right. More accurately from center right to fascism.

ANYONE who is in favor of the TPP, or NAFTA, or GATT, or any of the so-called trade agreements that have devastated US manufacturing and lowered US wages cannot by any stretch be called a liberal.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
12. ya gotta love the flat out lies in that piece
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:02 PM
May 2015

not to mention the misinformation.

<snip>

There have been a few issues on which Hillary Clinton has taken more centrist positions. She, of course, voted for the Iraq War (she now says that was a mistake). Clinton has been mostly pro free trade (although she hasn’t said much of anything on the Trans-Pacific Partnership). And she has been against marijuana legalization, and seemingly
remains so.

<snip>

She is pro TPP. She makes that crystal clear in her book.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
24. she already made a POST state department judgment. It's in her POST
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:21 PM
May 2015

state department book. She highly touts the tpp. so the wait and see stuff just isn't honest. it's blatant political maneuvering.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
137. Yep, like standing on a train track and saying you will believe it when the train runs over you. nm
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:16 AM
May 2015
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
11. "When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party"
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:01 PM
May 2015

Why is this considered a good thing? If anything, it makes it seem as though she has no positions of her own, and adopts the "official" positions only when she's told to adopt them.

That's a strike against her, IMO.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
111. Don't let them bully you...
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:48 PM
May 2015

It's people who talk the most shit on the net who are the most pusillanimous in real life...

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
116. Pusilanimous
Tue May 19, 2015, 09:26 PM
May 2015

OK, that's a new one to me, thank you Google for right-click "search for..."

Also, can you order some home-made sausage on my pizza too? (yes, I am being facetious)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
117. You should have told him to look at your journal...
Tue May 19, 2015, 09:38 PM
May 2015

You have several entries that can be construed as pro-Sanders.

Dem2

(8,166 posts)
118. I'm new here though I would think one could see what I've posted to date
Tue May 19, 2015, 09:47 PM
May 2015

I like Bernie - he has my heart, I like Hillary, she has my brain. I like our candidates.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
119. I can tell...
Tue May 19, 2015, 09:50 PM
May 2015

Maybe we will have that pizza on election eve when we have something to celebrate.


You do know what the pizza reference was, don't you?

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
35. Sometimes I wish I were part of this culture
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:41 PM
May 2015

so I would understand references like that.

Fortunately, those moments pass quickly.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
19. Hillary, Bill, Obama, they are all probably more liberal than people know.
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:16 PM
May 2015

It's the party that is moderate, but has been increasingly shifting more to the left.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
33. I'm going to post pro-HRC stuff in GD
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:39 PM
May 2015

Everyday I can get near a computer. Just to offset the screeds. I think others should as well. Love this thread right here!

And when it is all said and done, I will vote for the Democratic nominee.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
40. Well, to be fair,
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:44 PM
May 2015

Hillary is calling out TO Wall St.

While the finance industry does genuinely hate Warren, the big bankers love Clinton, and by and large they badly want her to be president. Many of the rich and powerful in the financial industry—among them, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Tom Nides, a powerful vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, and the heads of JPMorganChase and Bank of America—consider Clinton a pragmatic problem-solver not prone to populist rhetoric. To them, she’s someone who gets the idea that we all benefit if Wall Street and American business thrive. What about her forays into fiery rhetoric? They dismiss it quickly as political maneuvers. None of them think she really means her populism.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/why-wall-street-loves-hillary-112782.html#ixzz3acwy4MjN
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
47. You can listen to what the right wing media says...
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:50 PM
May 2015

Or you can listen to what the candidate says:

"Speaking with small business owners in Cedar Falls, Iowa, the Democratic presidential frontrunner on Tuesday offered a full-throated defense of a law that's served as a thorn in the side of big banks: Dodd-Frank.

"It's not the big banks that need relief from Washington -- it's small banks and small businesses," Clinton said. "We should be doing more to rein in risky behavior on Wall Street and 'Too Big to Fail.'"

The former secretary of state also scolded what she said were attempts by congressional Republicans to roll back consumer protection provisions and regulations aimed at big banks in Dodd-Frank, calling them "a cynical attempt to game the system for those at the top."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/politics/hillary-clinton-big-banks/

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
55. The Big Banks already have their Treasure Trove it was very important. It was called The Bailout.
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:57 PM
May 2015
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
78. Should have put it like this "It's not the big banks that need relief from Washington, (they already
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:27 PM
May 2015

got theirs)...and I wasn't blaming her, at least on this. She says she wants to "reign in risky behavior of the big banks" who pay her those 6 figure speaking gigs. You don't get $30 million in a few months working with or for small business. Disingenuous.

And I don't believe what she says when it is a sudden conversion based on what Bernie is saying. She's not about to break up the big banks, which is the only way to do what she says she wants to do. That "small business plan" could be written by any staffer with a college degree.

CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
114. I've been paying attention to Clinton's ties to Wall Street since she
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:58 PM
May 2015

voted for the hideous Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2001.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
44. I think you can rest easy. She'll get a lot of good stuff done, if for no other reason that she can
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:47 PM
May 2015

WIN.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
49. TPP, fracking, and having Serious Conversations abut the petty concerns of the Vast Unwashed?
Tue May 19, 2015, 06:51 PM
May 2015

Hell, yes, I know she was poor once, and not so long ago at that. $10 mil in the hole when they left the White House.

tiredtoo

(2,949 posts)
67. No word from her on TPP, Larry Summers
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:09 PM
May 2015

Just a couple of items of concern along with her being banked by Wall Street.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
155. This is NOT a liberal stance!
Wed May 20, 2015, 01:14 AM
May 2015



THIS is a liberal stance on "guest worker" (indentured servant labor) programs like H1B and H2B...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/25/this-is-a-massive-effort-to-attract-cheap-labor-why-sen-bernie-sanders-is-skeptical-of-guest-workers/

...
The bottom line is that I feel, very much, that a lot of the initiative behind these guest workers programs, a very large expansion of guest worker programs — H2B visas would go up to as many as 195,000, H1B to as many as 205,000 a year — is coming from large corporations who want cheap labor from abroad. Absolutely, there is a need for foreign labor. I recognize that in agriculture and certain areas in the high tech industry, you need foreign labor. But this is a massive effort to attract cheap labor, a great disservice to American workers.
...


More data in this DU post...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026630065
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
72. Funny how the same people that thought Obama....
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:20 PM
May 2015

... was their puretopian god turned against him the second he had to actually govern. See? Some things are not new at all.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
77. Are you familiar with the website politicalcompass.org?
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:27 PM
May 2015

It is fascinating...and sometimes appalling. I was there just yesterday, looking at their analysis of the candidates in 2012. The money quote regarding Obama:

Taking office during the financial meltdown, Obama appointed its principle architects to top economic positions. We list these because many of Obama's detractors absurdly portray him as either a radical liberal or a socialist, while his apologists, equally absurdly, continue to view him as a well-intentioned progressive, tragically thwarted by overwhelming pressures....Between 1998 and the last election, Obama amassed $37.6million from the financial services industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. While 2008 presidential candidate Obama appeared to champion universal health care, his first choice for Secretary of Health was a man who had spent years lobbying on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry against that very concept. Hey! You don't promise a successful pub, and then appoint the Salvation Army to run it. This time around, the honey-tongued President makes populist references to economic justice, while simultaneously appointing as his new Chief of Staff a former Citigroup executive concerned with hedge funds that bet on the housing market to collapse. Obama poses something of a challenge to The Political Compass, because he's a man of so few fixed principles.

My bold.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
80. Obama ran as a progressive and governed as a Conservative. While HRC may be on the same page
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:28 PM
May 2015

as Sen Warren on social issues, she differs greatly on economic, foreign policy, MIC, and Security State issues.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
84. I think she is dead on re: FP
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:33 PM
May 2015

And so is Obama. Maximum impact with minimal blood and treasure spilled.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
87. Neither are liberal on Foreign Policy. Obama is killing people with drones like there is no
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:38 PM
May 2015

tomorrow. I think the innocent to SUSPECTED terrorists ratio is 10 to 1. Some are children but I guess that can be rationalized away. In any case it aint liberal.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
97. Nah
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:14 PM
May 2015

He is brilliant on FP. And so is she. She was easily the best SoS in the last 30-40 years. Hands down.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
123. Nah.
Tue May 19, 2015, 10:06 PM
May 2015

Our FP is a mess and she was part of it.

Sorry.

Killing people with drones just seems un American.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
159. But neither of them are liberal on Foreign Policy are they? When people try to say she is
Wed May 20, 2015, 10:24 AM
May 2015

a liberal, they ignore her hawkish foreign policy. The Neocons love her Foreign Policy.

A

nd the thing is, these neocons have a point. Mrs. Clinton voted for the Iraq war; supported sending arms to Syrian rebels; likened Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, to Adolf Hitler; wholeheartedly backs Israel; and stresses the importance of promoting democracy.

It’s easy to imagine Mrs. Clinton’s making room for the neocons in her administration. No one could charge her with being weak on national security with the likes of Robert Kagan on board.

from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/06/opinion/sunday/are-neocons-getting-ready-to-ally-with-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0


You may like her hawkish, neocon-like foreign policy, but the point is that she can't be considered a progressive or populist. Her stands parallel The Third Way. Ok on social issues but very conservative on other issues, like the economy, foreign policy, and the NSA/CIA Security State.
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
140. So does yours but i am on mirt and see the knew posters daily and can tell you from
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:18 AM
May 2015

experience you are wrong.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
144. No that is the admins job.
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:24 AM
May 2015

My point is that the new posters are not mostly Hillary posters like you claimed.

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
79. I know she is more liberal than Bill Clinton, and possibly more
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:28 PM
May 2015

liberal than Obama. People have been brainwashed by the right-wing media.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
83. She isn't progressive when it comes to the economy or the MIC, or foreign policy, or
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:31 PM
May 2015

the NSA/CIA, etc. It didn't take the Right Wing to point our that she helped George Bush spread the lies of WMD in Iraq. Not very liberal.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
141. Yes there are many. But Homey don't play your game. Do you have any links to prove
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:19 AM
May 2015

otherwise? She is a corporatist (Goldman-Sachs) and she likes invading Iraq.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
146. If Breitbart said that HRC voted to invade Iraq, would it be untrue?
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:27 AM
May 2015

If Fox News said that HRC supported fracking would it be not true? Howz about the TPP?

I don't go to those sites and have seen lots of evidence that HRC favors Goldman-Sachs over the 99%. Show me otherwise.

I have seen evidence that HRC supports fracking. Do you have any evidence otherwise? How about her support for the TPP?

And it's easy to find evidence that she betrayed the Democratic Party and joined the Republicons to sell the lies about WMD in Iraq.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
149. Yes, it would make the claims BS
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:37 AM
May 2015

For instance you should know very well that gas is cleaner than coal. And she is talking about fracking in other countries to reduce reliance on oil. And more importantly to break Russia's leverage on smaller countries for need of Russian oil. That Russian grip has very real negative consequences for very real people.

She is also very clear that those countries should regulate gas production to include environmental controls.

She is right about all of that. Spot on in fact. But Deadbart is not going to tell you any of that. That's the problem with using right wing sites as your source.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
150. Fracking is destroying our water supplies. She supports fracking so oil companies can
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:42 AM
May 2015

make more profits. The same oil companies that will help her campaign reach $2 billion dollars.

"She is also very clear that those countries should regulate gas production to include environmental controls. " This is rhetoric. She says this but will do nothing to ensure it happens.

What do your sources say that her stand is today on fracking in the USofA?

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
152. Do you have solar panels - are you off the grid?
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:49 AM
May 2015

Do you walk everywhere you go? If not, you are helping to "destroy" our climate.

Let's live in reality land. Gas is cleaner than coal and oil. Her position is no different than Obama. Gas is a better alternative as we work to transition to more renewable energy tech.

But her "support" of fracking is not about this country. It's about countries that are involuntarily being screwed by Russia due to their dependence on Russian oil.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
153. Fracking is win-win for big corporations. The oil companies can get more gas and they can
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:54 AM
May 2015

dump their toxic wastes (that would cost them a bundle to get rid of) into our aquifers. As our water supplies get poisoned, Leslie's and Coke can sell us water. Plus fracking is causing hundreds of earthquakes in Oklahoma, for example. But the oil companies will donate big to HRC's campaign and foundation.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
154. You didn't answer the question
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:57 AM
May 2015

So I assume you use as much oil and gas as anyone else. Will your heat and hot water and lights and car and Internet and computer all magically work without an energy source if we elect Bernie?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
160. You are trying to divert the subject. Fracking is bad for America. It may cost me more
Wed May 20, 2015, 10:27 AM
May 2015

for gas and oil, but we have to stop them from destroying our environment. They are destroying aquifers that will never recover. No problem for PepsiCo, they will gladly supply bottled water to Oklahoma for a nice profit.

There are two sides to this class war and those that push fracking are on the wrong side.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
92. Though this has been posted the same wrong talking points of denial continues.
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:50 PM
May 2015

Thanks for posting this again, probably will not change the minds of many but the truth is good for the soul, hopefully it may sink in with some.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
96. More like HRC wants to be a liberal but she has lived in the bubble for so long
Tue May 19, 2015, 07:57 PM
May 2015

that she has no idea what being a liberal means.

Supporting Gay Marriage is great, but not so good if the people who are getting married can't afford it.
Immigration reform is awesome. Not so good if we are paying wages that match 3rd world countries.
Criminal Justice Reform. Great, she can undo all the horrible shit her husband did.

The only people who think HRC and Obama are hard core liberals are not actually liberals themselves. Conservatives spend a lot of time telling me what "liberals" think, and usually it has nothing to do with what's going on in my liberal mind.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
107. So now Nate Silver's group, who has seldom been wrong about anything, is full of it because
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:43 PM
May 2015

the "liberal lions" on DU have declared Hillary a neo-corporatist Third Wayingest fascist corpo-Dem meanie in spite of the overwhelming evidence and numerous links in the piece that say the total opposite.

Totally consistent with this New DU. Right on.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
130. Let's remember exactly where Nate Silver was in 2012...
Tue May 19, 2015, 10:32 PM
May 2015

Because if memory serves me correctly he was almost dead on but now he must have an agenda, the big meanie.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
134. And also remember exactly WHO it was at the time screaming that Big Bad Nate had that agenda
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:06 AM
May 2015

I don't think you or I need a refresher, but it appears that some folks here have extremely short memories. A little article to jog some memories:

'Mitt Romney’s Electoral Problem and the War on Nate Silver'
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2012/10/31/mitt-romneys-electoral-problem-and-the-war-on-nate-silver

But yeah, now he's "lying" and has an agenda! Forget the 57 different sources the author refers to in his OP complete with links to Hillary's voting record and comments. The folks at DU have repeatedly shown that only they know the really real truth! Just look at all those times Obama cut Social Security in complete vindication of the regulars in this forum who screamed he'd do just that!1one!

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
108. The liberals I know don't love big corporations and put business over workers
Tue May 19, 2015, 08:44 PM
May 2015

A liberal believes that the people come first, not businesses and especially big business.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
145. Where only Kucinich and Nader are liberal....
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:26 AM
May 2015

And every other Democratic candidate is a right winger. Well, I guess if some website called "political compass" thinks so it must be true.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
161. yeah, they just arbitrarily placed them there..
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:47 PM
May 2015

and those scores weren't based on policy positions, votes, or anything of the sort. How far over into the authoritarian/right quadrant did you score?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(HRC) is as liberal as El...