Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2002: Esteemed professors-Who got it right on Iraqi War-Had to pay to get this AD published in NYT (Original Post) kpete May 2015 OP
the bushees suppressed any information that did not support the war samsingh May 2015 #1
I wouldnt narrow the blame excessively reddread May 2015 #3
the right wing media was in full cohoots samsingh May 2015 #5
Rather as an example reddread May 2015 #6
The information that countered Bush's war plans was hard to find. procon May 2015 #2
profit motives, regulatory threats, tax incentives, maybe? reddread May 2015 #4
K & R malaise May 2015 #7

samsingh

(17,595 posts)
1. the bushees suppressed any information that did not support the war
Wed May 20, 2015, 10:03 AM
May 2015

and now complete morons are buying into the faulty intelligence lies.

that's a repug world for you.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
3. I wouldnt narrow the blame excessively
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:09 AM
May 2015

as far as stupification, that started decades previously, the fruits of which have now ripened past stinking.
The mendacity of media and unregulated cable excuses have their roots in 1947.
what a long, sad trip it's been.

samsingh

(17,595 posts)
5. the right wing media was in full cohoots
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:48 AM
May 2015

but the bushies destroyed anyone who questioned the need to go to war.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
6. Rather as an example
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:50 AM
May 2015

among others, now we do it ourselves.
the Bush era was begun in the 80's and now we are the fruits of it.

procon

(15,805 posts)
2. The information that countered Bush's war plans was hard to find.
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:04 AM
May 2015

I remember only a few American news outlets carried any stories that questioned or refuted the outright lies coming out of Bush's war machine. There was credible news coming out of the foreign media that just ripped the Bush propaganda to shreds, but under the caveat of silly slogans like, 'if they aren't with us, they were agin us', the public became suspicious of anything that wasn't cheerleading the push for war.

I'd really like to know why the American media tossed aside their critical role the Fourth Estate who must ask the hard questions of our government leaders and press them for verifiable answers in the public's name. Instead of leading the vanguard in investigating the administration's cherry picked claims, the press became simpering, fawning lapdogs.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
4. profit motives, regulatory threats, tax incentives, maybe?
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:11 AM
May 2015

the "media" was a lapdog to NSA drug running law breakers long before GW was seated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2002: Esteemed professors...