Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCheney Thought Al Qaeda Was Bluffing, ignored warnings
Daily Kos
by ericlewis0
In case you didn't yet know Cheney was recklessly incompetent. From firstlook.org:
When presented with an actual terror threat the one that turned into the 9/11 attacks Cheney thought al Qaeda was bluffing.
No kidding. This is from The Great War Of Our Time: The CIAs Fight Against Terrorism, a new book by former acting CIA director Mike Morell:
The threat reporting continued [in the spring and summer of 2001] other pieces were titled Bin Ladin Attacks May Be Imminent and Bin Ladin Planning High-Profile Attacks but I sensed some skepticism about it. The vice president one morning asked me whether all this threat reporting might not be deception on the part of al Qaida purposely designed to get our attention and to get us to needlessly expend resources in response.
According to Morell, who was then in charge of the daily presidential intelligence briefing, the CIA felt they then needed to produce a report titled UBL [Usama bin Laden] Threats Are Real.
(DK author's bold)
https://firstlook.org/...
Thanks, Dick. Good thing you were there to ignore all the warnings from the CIA - so much so they felt it necessary to write a brief titled, "UBL Threats Are Real." Maybe they'd have done better to release one called "V.P. Cheney is a Dangerous Asshole."
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/19/1385971/-Cheney-Thought-Al-Qaeda-Was-Bluffing?detail=email
That's the entire article. But you should click link f/ Mad mag pic he chose.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 679 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cheney Thought Al Qaeda Was Bluffing, ignored warnings (Original Post)
Panich52
May 2015
OP
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)1. Dick and Dubya remain free.
Hope and Change. Bait and Switch. What's the diff?
Panich52
(5,829 posts)4. Maybe not as free as you think
Have you noticed than none from tge top of Bush's admin has traveled out of the country? The reason may ve that Kuala Lampur tribunal found Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others guilty of war crimes. They could be arrested if caught overseas.
Euro courts also have investigations, mostly concerning CIA's rendition, but war crimes against admin is part of it. Italy already tried, convicted, and arrested CIA ops.
Just hope international officers keep watching for them to cross that safety zone...
tanyev
(42,516 posts)2. And Richard Clarke tried to get them to have a principal's meeting on Al-Qaeda in January 2001,
but Condi and Cheney knew better.
Interview: Richard Clarke
JB: Condoleezza Rice wrote today in response to your book - that the Bush administration did have a strategy for eliminating al-Qaida and that the administration worked on it in the spring and summer of 2001? Is that true?
RC: We developed that strategy in the last several months of the Clinton administration and it was basically an update on that strategy. We briefed Condi on that strategy. The point is that it was done before they came to office and she never held a meeting on it. It was done before she asked for it.
JB: What about the claim that the administration did work hard on the issue?
RC: Its not true. I asked - on January 24 in writing to Condi - urgently for a meeting on cabinet level - the principal's committee - to review the plan and I was told I can't have that. It had to go to the deputies. They had a principals meeting on September 4. Contrast that with the principal's meeting on Iraq, on February 1. So what was urgent for them was Iraq. Al-Qaida was not important to them.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/mar/23/usa.september111
JB: Condoleezza Rice wrote today in response to your book - that the Bush administration did have a strategy for eliminating al-Qaida and that the administration worked on it in the spring and summer of 2001? Is that true?
RC: We developed that strategy in the last several months of the Clinton administration and it was basically an update on that strategy. We briefed Condi on that strategy. The point is that it was done before they came to office and she never held a meeting on it. It was done before she asked for it.
JB: What about the claim that the administration did work hard on the issue?
RC: Its not true. I asked - on January 24 in writing to Condi - urgently for a meeting on cabinet level - the principal's committee - to review the plan and I was told I can't have that. It had to go to the deputies. They had a principals meeting on September 4. Contrast that with the principal's meeting on Iraq, on February 1. So what was urgent for them was Iraq. Al-Qaida was not important to them.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/mar/23/usa.september111
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)3. Oh the irony!
n/t