Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,612 posts)
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:03 PM May 2015

Why is funding Amtrak such a struggle? Because Republican districts don’t use it.

Why is funding Amtrak such a struggle? Because Republican districts don’t use it.

By Philip Bump at the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/05/13/why-is-funding-amtrak-such-a-struggle-because-republican-districts-dont-use-it/?tid=rssfeed

"SNIP.................



House Republicans had planned to spend Wednesday marking up a transportation spending bill that included steep cuts to the budget for Amtrak, the federally funded passenger train service. As The Post's Colby Itkowitz noted, Congress has delayed passing long-term legislation to fund Amtrak since 2013, instead repeatedly reauthorizing existing funding levels. The last time it passed a long-term bill, in 2008, the vote passed only after a rail disaster. Which, of course, happened again Tuesday night.

The constant struggle of Amtrak to get funding derives largely from the fact that not very many Americans use the rail system. Ridership is heavily centered in the Northeast, in the corridor between Boston and Washington where Tuesday's accident occurred. But more than that, ridership is unevenly distributed politically. Data from the National Association of Railroad Passengers shows the number of passengers that get on or off the train in any given congressional district, and reveals an obvious reason why Republicans might not be too concerned about funding the system.

......

Much of the heavy usage hugs the coasts; California's in-state system sees decent traffic. The Upper Plains states have seen steady usage in recent years thanks in part to the growth of the oil fields on the North Dakota/Montana border.

........

Of those 184 districts, 116 are currently represented by Republicans. On average, ridership in Republican districts was about 41,000 in 2014 -- compared to 261,000 in Democratic districts.



...............SNIP"
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is funding Amtrak such a struggle? Because Republican districts don’t use it. (Original Post) applegrove May 2015 OP
Entirely true. MANative May 2015 #1
Why is funding Amtrak such a struggle? Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2015 #2
Yes but the planes Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #5
Its THIER money! DiverDave May 2015 #3
I bet most voters were surprised that Amtrac was yeoman6987 May 2015 #4
It isn't Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #7
Would it survive on their own? yeoman6987 May 2015 #8
Nope Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #11
And those that do/did, always support it, elleng May 2015 #6
You may be on to something Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #10
I have no doubt I am, elleng May 2015 #14
Is Amtrak unionized? B Calm May 2015 #9
Yes. Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #12
Republicans are all for cheap labor and hate labor unions that bring up wages. That is why they B Calm May 2015 #13
Because putting public safety Ruby the Liberal May 2015 #15
Tell me who asked for a train from Fort Worth to Oklahoma City... brooklynite May 2015 #16

MANative

(4,112 posts)
1. Entirely true.
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:11 PM
May 2015

What these idiots always fail to remember is that the biggest engine of the increasingly information, finance, and service-driven economy is here in the Northeast, and northern states contribute to the national tax base disproportionately. Who benefits from that? Far more federal money goes to "red" states than blue.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
2. Why is funding Amtrak such a struggle?
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:13 PM
May 2015

(Samuel L. Jackson) Airplanes Motherfucker! Have You Heard of Them? (/Samuel L. Jackson)

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
3. Its THIER money!
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:14 PM
May 2015

The rich see every dollar spent on anything but their own interests as 'theft'.
I truly believe they want every social program gutted so they can get it.
They see all the money spent and get angry that it's not going to
them.

It's sick, but it's real.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
4. I bet most voters were surprised that Amtrac was
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:26 PM
May 2015

Run by the government. Most thought it was like the airlines.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
7. It isn't
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:27 PM
May 2015

It is a Corp - but gets federal funding - so can't really make any major decisions as Congress has the ability to legislate their budget.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
11. Nope
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:32 PM
May 2015


The Post Office is getting by on their own, but the requirement by Congress to pre-fund pensions for 75 years nearly broke them. Amtrak isn't even that close to being profitable.

elleng

(130,864 posts)
6. And those that do/did, always support it,
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:26 PM
May 2015

and go wild if closure if their local stations were/are proposed to be closed.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
10. You may be on to something
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:31 PM
May 2015

Where my Mom lives is a HEAVY GoP district. It is also a stop on the Amtrak line from NYC and Philly.

So close the stops in every district where an R-Idiot voted against funding and tell people to drive 10-20 miles to the next station. I would be pissed as a visitor. Imagine the outcry from the commuters!

elleng

(130,864 posts)
14. I have no doubt I am,
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:41 PM
May 2015

at least I WAS, when I worked in the agency that dealt with rail 'abandonments,' and we kept up with this stuff. We did mostly freight matters. The big whiners were on the line to the south of the NE corridor, into Florida: KEEP MY STATION! (Also some in the west too.)

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
13. Republicans are all for cheap labor and hate labor unions that bring up wages. That is why they
Wed May 20, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

also hate the US Postal Service.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is funding Amtrak suc...