Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Bin Laden outrage nobody is talking about: What the government’s OBL “treasure trove” really rev
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/21/the_bin_laden_outrage_nobody_is_talking_about_what_the_governments_obl_treasure_trove_really_reveals/About 10 days ago, Seymour Hersh wrote a story claiming much of what the government has told us about the Osama bin Laden raid was false. Among other claims, Hersh said the government had exaggerated the trove of intelligence seized from bin Ladens compound. We were told at first, Hersh quoted the primary source for his story, that the Seals produced garbage bags of stuff and that the community is generating daily intelligence reports out of this stuff .But nothing has come of it.
Wednesday morning, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released what it calls a sizable tranche of documents it explains were seized from the compound. That sizable tranche consists of just 409 documents, of which only 103 were previously considered classified. (That ODNI calls this to be sizable may support Hershs claim there was less information than claimed.)
(snip)
So Americas spooks have released a bizarrely-organized group of bin Laden materials, using a pre-embargo release to over-emphasize how much OBL wallowed in conspiracy theories (though he did do some of that), but they insist this is not an attempt to spin Seymour Hersh as a conspiracy theorist.
(snip)
Perhaps most interestingly, the counter-conspiracy spooks have stuck the Senate Intelligence Committees hearing on CIAs Project MKUltra in with the books it claims to be conspiracy theories rather than in the publicly available US government documents category. The Senate held the MKUltra hearing in 1977 after new information in addition to information previously exposed during the Church Committee showed that CIA had conducted human experimentation with drugs like LSD to attempt to exercise mind control. We also need to know and understand what is now being done by the CIA in the field of behavioral research to be certain that no current abuses are occurring, Senator Daniel Inouye introduced the hearing, before asking CIA Director Stansfield Turner to explain why these materials hadnt been previously disclosed. The reappearance of reports of the abuses of the drug testimony program and reports of other previously unknown drug programs and projects for behavioral control, Inouye continued, underline the necessity for effective oversight procedures both in the executive branch and in the Congress.
So at one level, the hearing report is yet another example of Congress futilely trying to rein in the CIA after learning it had engaged in illicit, unethical, and illegal activities. But the inclusion of the MKUltra hearing report on bin Ladens bookshelf is notable for another reason. The CIAs recent torture program to which 14 of bin Ladens top associates, along with some innocents and looser affiliates of al Qaeda, were subjected is the institutional descendant of the MKUltra program.
(end snip)
Funny, too, that bin Forgotten and his reading list are resurrected just in time for the Patriot Act vote. like Old Times.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 586 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post