Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:11 PM May 2015

We are Fucked up in this Country: Rachel Maddow talking about the parents having to pay.

Colorado law says anyone who sues a gun manufacture (And loose) have to pay court cost for the manufacture (and this is only for gun makers/bullets)


Got to fucking love Corporate America!


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We are Fucked up in this Country: Rachel Maddow talking about the parents having to pay. (Original Post) diabeticman May 2015 OP
Uh, that's true of any civil suit. jeff47 May 2015 #1
And not only Colorado. And not only individual against corporatation. WillowTree May 2015 #2
Wrong - the defendant DID NOT counter-sue. Colorado law required that the plaintiffs bullwinkle428 May 2015 #3
And that's true of any suit. Not a guns only law. jeff47 May 2015 #6
Actually - that's not quite accurate... Whiskeytide May 2015 #4
My understanding is CO has a general "loser pays" law. jeff47 May 2015 #7
I read an article about it... Whiskeytide May 2015 #8
The parents got really bad legal advice hack89 May 2015 #5
Not unusual. NaturalHigh May 2015 #9

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
1. Uh, that's true of any civil suit.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:00 PM
May 2015

If you sue, and you lose, the defendant can counter-sue for attorney's fees. It's not a special "guns only" rule.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
3. Wrong - the defendant DID NOT counter-sue. Colorado law required that the plaintiffs
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:10 PM
May 2015

pay the court costs and attorneys' fees simply because they were on the losing end of the suit.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
6. And that's true of any suit. Not a guns only law.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:18 PM
May 2015

And the defendant still has to ask for it. One of the defendants did not.

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
4. Actually - that's not quite accurate...
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:16 PM
May 2015

... the party that loses a civil action can be taxed costs, but typically NOT attorney's fees unless there is a statutory basis for the fees or a contractual provision calling for them. Costs can get hefty, but typically only include court costs (filing fees, subpoena costs) and sometimes expenses like deposition costs, travel expenses, exhibit preparation costs, etc... And the judges have some discretion on a lot of it.

The OP says "costs". I haven't seen TRMS, and have not read the bill - so maybe it does include attorney's fees. But that would be an exception to the general common law in most states.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
7. My understanding is CO has a general "loser pays" law.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:19 PM
May 2015

But it still requires the defendant to ask for it.

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
8. I read an article about it...
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:31 PM
May 2015

... the defendants DID file motions seeking the fee and cost awards. The article is a little vague, but does say the CO statute allows reasonable attorneys fees. That's a special statutory provision - I'm sure lobbied for and included in the tort reform laws that have swept the nation over the last 15-20 years.

http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/index.php/parents-lost-daughter-mass-shooter-now-owe-220000-suppliers/

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. The parents got really bad legal advice
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:17 PM
May 2015

it is not like the laws are not crystal clear and it was obvious to most observers that they had no legal leg to stand on.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
9. Not unusual.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:34 PM
May 2015

If you file a frivolous lawsuit and lose, expect to pay all of the attorney's fees. Otherwise, any yokel could decide he has a grudge against a company or his neighbor and either drive them out of business or into bankruptcy or just sue until they pay him to go away.

This is a good law, and there are many like it to protect companies and individuals.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We are Fucked up in this ...