Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,763 posts)
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:02 AM May 2015

Wingnut blogosphere trying to call Waco biker gathering a "political meeting".

Despite the characterization by police that the afternoon gathering at a Twin Peaks restaurant in Waco, Texas that led to Sunday’s bloody shooting incident was a gathering of criminal biker gangs with violent intent, the meeting appears to have been a legitimate, organized gathering of motorcycle riders meeting to discuss political issues.

The group that met was the Texas Confederation of Clubs and Independents (CoC&I) and a look at that group’s website and history gives a very different impression of the group’s purpose and goals than what has been said repeatedly by Waco police Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton.

Swanton has been a central media figure, conducting several press conferences since shootings that left nine dead and dozens injured happened on Sunday. Swanton’s statements have been echoed by the media, creating an image of a get together of thugs converging on Twin Peaks in an event obviously fraught with danger that authorities tried desperately to stop until they were foiled by the uncooperative restaurant owner.

The “gathering of criminal bikers” story was even used to justify the $1 million bail that the 170 arrested bikers were each handed.


http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/05/21/criminal-meeting-of-bikers-in-waco-was-actually-organized-political-gathering/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wingnut blogosphere trying to call Waco biker gathering a "political meeting". (Original Post) RandySF May 2015 OP
Nine people died in a spirited political discussion over protecting second amendment rights. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #1
They just tend to get overly "persuasive" when negotiating world wide wally May 2015 #2
"Mr Chairman, I calls the question!" struggle4progress May 2015 #3
Does Robert's Rules of Order cover when to hide your handgun in a bag of chips before running from FSogol May 2015 #4
I wish the police would have let them Ilsa May 2015 #5
Yeah, because the Cossacks and the Banditos Codeine May 2015 #6

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
1. Nine people died in a spirited political discussion over protecting second amendment rights.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:10 AM
May 2015

by voting with the bullet box instead of a ballot box.

struggle4progress

(118,278 posts)
3. "Mr Chairman, I calls the question!"
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:14 AM
May 2015
Yew cain't calls the question yet, ya fuggin nimrod!
"Why not?"
Cuz this here is Texas! And the rule here are: shoot first, call the question later, dumbass!

FSogol

(45,473 posts)
4. Does Robert's Rules of Order cover when to hide your handgun in a bag of chips before running from
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:02 AM
May 2015

the law?

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
6. Yeah, because the Cossacks and the Banditos
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:43 AM
May 2015

are well known for their thoughtful, measured political discourse and spirited community organizing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wingnut blogosphere tryin...