Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:12 PM May 2015

Yes, 14 year old sex offenders are immature and should be given a break, BUT,

if they are not held accountable for their crimes they will likely become repeat offenders. Duggar got off scot free for his disgusting acts against siblings. He obviously does not recognize and/or abide by physical/emotional boundaries, even within the family. Frankly, I am VERY concerned about his little daughter.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, 14 year old sex offenders are immature and should be given a break, BUT, (Original Post) MoonRiver May 2015 OP
Someone, outside of the family, needs to be concerned about his daughter. In_The_Wind May 2015 #1
I'm not saying there isn't reason for concern justiceischeap May 2015 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #2
Who's branding him? MoonRiver May 2015 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #4
They usually happen concurrently. MoonRiver May 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #6
Well, I am a psychologist in a juvenile detention facility. MoonRiver May 2015 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #7
How can we know he hasn't? Who would tell on him? csziggy May 2015 #9
Exactly, we don't know. MoonRiver May 2015 #10
Josh got a "stern talking to" from the family friend state trooper riderinthestorm May 2015 #16
I'm concerned with what kind of counseling he received. I don't know the statistics on whether or liberal_at_heart May 2015 #11
Here is what I could find about the counseling csziggy May 2015 #18
"Giving them a break" or not is something that should be done IN COURT, AFTER A TRIAL LadyHawkAZ May 2015 #12
I did mean after a court case and sentence. MoonRiver May 2015 #13
I agree with that- juvenile offenders should be judged case by case LadyHawkAZ May 2015 #19
Ditto MoonRiver May 2015 #22
I know this is off subject but I remember the kids was not able to kiss, etc while "dating" and I Thinkingabout May 2015 #14
There is no excuse in the parents choosing to hide their avebury May 2015 #15
A couple of points-- Jackpine Radical May 2015 #17
It's not about giving someone a break. It's now about responsible adults sorting out the pieces and libdem4life May 2015 #20
I just looked it up - there are five young girls still home aged 5, 6, 7, 9 and 17 yrs riderinthestorm May 2015 #25
Sex offenders Rehab often consists of "Dont get caught again" Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #21
^^^^^ this ^^^^^ libdem4life May 2015 #23
Have a point here... Lithos May 2015 #26
Did TLC know about this Duggart family secret? dem in texas May 2015 #27

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
24. I'm not saying there isn't reason for concern
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:06 PM
May 2015

but some sexual predators are discriminating in who they'll molest. I have a relative that drew the line at his natural children but found his step-daughters fair game because there wasn't blood relation there. In Duggar's case, it doesn't seem he draws a distinction between blood and non-blood but he could draw the line at "his" and not his. I'd still feel better if someone from outside their little bubble had a chat with the girl, though.

Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
3. Who's branding him?
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:35 PM
May 2015

Since he never faced any consequences for his sexual crimes, he is likely to feel it's ok to do it again. His little daughter is very vulnerable, imo.

Response to MoonRiver (Reply #3)

Response to MoonRiver (Reply #5)

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
8. Well, I am a psychologist in a juvenile detention facility.
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:42 PM
May 2015

I may be a little bit more informed than you.

Response to MoonRiver (Reply #5)

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
9. How can we know he hasn't? Who would tell on him?
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:43 PM
May 2015

His little daughter or his submissive wife who is completely controlled by him?

His parents and a police officer covered up the original incidents from years ago. They would feel no compunction about covering up another set of incidents. For all we know he could have been molesting his daughter for years now and we would not know.

He had NO rehabilitation. He was sent for "counseling" to a man who is now incarcerated - for the second time - for child pornography. The man was not a trained counselor, just a family friend who the Duggars trusted to not turn them in for covering up child molestation.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
16. Josh got a "stern talking to" from the family friend state trooper
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:15 PM
May 2015

who wrote the report and buried it until the statute of limitations ran out.

Oh and yes, that state trooper is now serving 56 years for child porn.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
11. I'm concerned with what kind of counseling he received. I don't know the statistics on whether or
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:46 PM
May 2015

not counseling reduces the re-offending rate, but just what kind of counseling would a young man in his family environment be receiving anyway? It's quite clear in the language that he used in his public statement that he is not taking full responsibility for what he has done.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
18. Here is what I could find about the counseling
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:27 PM
May 2015

Apparently there were two efforts made - first to a church approved facility, then the "talk" with the child porno state police officer.

The stay at the church facility was in March 17 to July 17, 2003:

In a separate interview with police, Michelle Duggar later says that the treatment program the person attended was not with a certified counselor but with a “guy they knew in Little Rock who is remodeling a building,” the report says.

The Democrat-Gazette has this to say about “the old Veteran’s Hospital in Little Rock,” the location given by Jim Bob Duggar as the site of the counseling:

<SNIP>

Shortly after the institute acquired the building {from Hobby Lobby}, Gothard began renovating the space, saying it would be used for the Little Rock Training Center, which would house “court-referred youthful offenders in the organization’s Bible-based rehabilitation program,” according to an April 2000 article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.


Bill Gothard’s teachings have been promoted by the Duggar family in the past. In 2014, Gothard resigned from the Institute in Basic Life Principles following allegations of sexual harassment, molestation and failing to report child abuse. A spokesman for the Institute couldn’t confirm or deny to the Democrat-Gazette whether a youth treatment program was in place at the building in 2003.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/05/23/a-timeline-of-the-molestation-allegations-against-josh-duggar/


Silence led to no case for Duggar
By Chad Day , Doug Thompson

<SNIP>

In his statement Thursday, Duggar said he confessed his actions to his parents, "who took several steps to help me address the situation. We spoke with the authorities where I confessed my wrongdoing, and my parents arranged for me and those affected by my actions to receive counseling. I understood that if I continued down this wrong road that I would end up ruining my life."

The police report shows that Duggar, his father and an elder from their church discussed the conduct with the state police corporal, who is now serving a prison term on child pornography charges. The discussion came after Josh Duggar returned in July 2003 from a three-month stay in Little Rock.
http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2015/may/23/silence-led-to-no-case-for-duggar-20150/

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
12. "Giving them a break" or not is something that should be done IN COURT, AFTER A TRIAL
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:54 PM
May 2015

His victims and the rest of society have the right to their say in court, as the victims of the crime. Since the victims (past and future) and society were not granted that due to a cover-up of the crimes, why am I required to give the molester a break? Not my responsibility, sorry.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
19. I agree with that- juvenile offenders should be judged case by case
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:32 PM
May 2015

so those deserving a break can get it, and those that don't, don't.

I've seen too many people today asking for "sympathy" and "forgiveness" from the public though, and it's pissing me off. Not my job. He's a child molester. He targeted prepubescent girls, including his own sisters, and he got away with it. I'm not a court and I don't have to care about his poor little feelings or his bright future. Fuck that guy.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
14. I know this is off subject but I remember the kids was not able to kiss, etc while "dating" and I
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:11 PM
May 2015

Realize their show was just that but golly. The girls did not have a safe place to go to report crimes.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
15. There is no excuse in the parents choosing to hide their
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:14 PM
May 2015

sons crimes instead of protecting their minor children and a young girl who was not a part of their family. By covering up the crime, the denied the parents of the one girl to step up and protect their daughter. The parents have proven themselves to be unfit parents.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
17. A couple of points--
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:19 PM
May 2015

Most young sex offenders of that age have themselves been victimized by older children or adults.

Juvenile sex offenders are NOT likely to commit further ex offenses in adulthood. There is quite an extensive psychological literature on that point.

I haven't been paying any attention to this story, and actually have no idea of who these Duggar people are, other than what might be gleaned from a few DU headlines, but if I had any involvement with a case like this, one of the things I would explore is the offender's potential history as a victim of abuse.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
20. It's not about giving someone a break. It's now about responsible adults sorting out the pieces and
Sat May 23, 2015, 06:00 PM
May 2015

working Day Forward. The history is now out and must be dealt with. Those initially responsible parties are the parents and they aren't going to assist in the process easily. They failed miserably. To blame a child, even a teenager for his own parents denial and immaturity is not useful. It is rare a child surpases his parent's emotional IQ or even sexual IQ.

Here again, facts matter. There are many adults here who failed these children and continue to do so. Before we start offering up this clearly wounded man and his horribly dysfunctional family, we need more facts, compassionate human beings who can help to start the healing, while making some sense of the senseless.

But first, the girl still at home...I think there is only one. What a lonely and now frightening place it must be for her, especially.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
25. I just looked it up - there are five young girls still home aged 5, 6, 7, 9 and 17 yrs
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:07 PM
May 2015

plus a couple of older adult young women.

There's also six underage boys and three adult young men still at home.

I don't believe the sexual assaults are just against the females...imo



Lithos

(26,403 posts)
26. Have a point here...
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:20 PM
May 2015

First, "sex offender" is a vague term which covers a lot of ground. Yes, I know you're talking about Duggar, but one size does not fit all. There are those who get caught "sexting" or engaging in consensual sex with those under their age.

That said, I am complete agreement with you concerning Duggar. For those of Duggar's nature, this, IMHO, is much akin to kids who hurt animals who then graduate to the bigger crimes involving sociopathic behavior killing and maiming people. If the system does not immediately step in and start treatment, it's not a question of if - but when.

L-

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
27. Did TLC know about this Duggart family secret?
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:21 PM
May 2015

My guess is that they did. If Oprah received an anonymous E-mail, chances are TLC did too. The hypocrisy of the parents and all who covered for the boy are disgusting. The Duggarts wanted to appear to be "Goodie 2-Shoes" when they were not. Come on, TLC, find us some more sorry people like Honey Boo's mom and Josh Duggart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes, 14 year old sex offe...