General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'j'ever wonder how suposedly Liberal elite universities churn out so many wingnuts?!1 Here's Harvard
Granted, the wingnuts so produced are bottom tier on the mental scale: Clarence THOMAS, Ben CARSON, Ruben NAVARRETTE, and O'LOOFAH got some kind of specialized bragging rights. If I were O'LOOFAH's professor, my first question would be, "What do you imagine *learning* here (as opposed to your own preaching)?!1" And if somebody quibbles about CARSON being on my list, I submit that whatever his professional expertise is, his deprecation of science in his other opinions is flabbergasting.
Reminder: NAVARRETTE got his niche as a "non-traditional" voice (vis a vis his home minority ethnic group) with a book griping about "White Liberal males" after he (finally) graduated.
*********QUOTE********
http://nypost.com/2015/05/24/does-harvard-have-a-secret-history-as-a-major-force-for-evil/
[font size=5]Does Harvard have a secret history as a major force for evil?[/font]
.... Now, there are plenty of criticisms of Harvard, though rarely the one Eun-jung levels: that Harvard swanned its way to dominance by maintaining a false front of liberalism when it is, in fact, an arm of the governing right.
Verita$ recites a litany of bad acts: the Salem witch trials, eugenics, a so-called collaboration with Joseph Goebbels and Heinrich Himmler, architects of financial collapse such as Robert Rubin and Larry Summers, McCarthyism, racism, sexism, tyrannical labor practices and a poison called elitism. ....
The institutional corruption stems from Harvards hungry endowment, Eun-jung says. The Harvard Corporation invests wisely if not well, for instance backing Enron then mysteriously cashing out before it tanked the energy markets. This black box of university finance, she says, shows Harvard is an undemocratic pawn of international corporate overlords.
This made me wonder: Why would Harvard go through the trouble of hiring leftist professors in the first place, if they are only going to marginalize them while theyre there? She asks. After thinking about this question, the answer became obvious: Harvards pride in the myth of its progressive character. ....
Within the college the core of Harvards elite brand there are many mansions: WASP legacy Harvard, the dirty white baseball hats of athletics and male-only drinking clubs; the precious, artsy and gay Harvard; a drone-like premed Harvard, and so on. These Harvards hardly know each other after freshman year they are all too busy taking over the world. ....
Eun-jungs book reads like a campus tour delivered by an embittered sophomore. ....
*************UNQUOTE
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)For evil, and for good.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)UTUSN
(70,645 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)UTUSN
(70,645 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,154 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Harvard is no exception. But like most elites, they are all guaranteed a good place under the lighting. Few reject that.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And if they weren't elitists before entering Harvard a lot of them will be before they leave.
UTUSN
(70,645 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)I have no doubt Ben Carson and Ted Cruz are very smart, or at least they were in college. That doesn't change the fact that they are batshit crazy now. In Carson's case even people who have known him for years can't figure out why he has gone off of the deep end.
Personally, my theory is that they have no moral center, so they spew this crap because it gets them attention and money, and don't care about the consequences. Any of us could take what Rushbo, Faux and Free Republic are spewing and regurgitate it if we so desired, and sound just like Carson and Cruz. But we would have to do so knowing that we have sold out to make money by doing harm. Which may be even worse than going insane.