General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConstitutional horror: Clarence Thomas argues states can establish official religion - See more at:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2014/05/constitutional-horror-clarence-thomas-argues-states-can-establish-official-religion/The Establishment Clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another, or none.
While Thomas believes that the Establishment Clause probably prohibits the federal government from establishing an official, national religion, he sees no problem with individual state establishing an official state religion.
In the recent, disastrous Supreme Court ruling that found Christian prayers used to open government meetings to be constitutional, Thomas went further than his other conservative colleagues in condoning sectarian prayers at government functions. In his dissenting opinion Thomas disputes the widely accepted notion that the First Amendments ban on the establishment of religion even applies to state and local governments.
- See more at: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2014/05/constitutional-horror-clarence-thomas-argues-states-can-establish-official-religion/#sthash.HxsAv8hH.dpuf
[font size = 2]State Churches? Justice Clarence Thomas Hears the Call[/font size = 2]
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/05/09/justice-clarence-thomas-and-the-church-of-virginia/
dhill926
(16,314 posts)elleng
(130,740 posts)has been for a long time, that is,
The incorporation of the Bill of Rights (or incorporation for short) is the process by which American courts have applied portions of the U.S. Bill of Rights to the states. Prior to 1925, the Bill of Rights was held only to apply to the federal government. Under the incorporation doctrine, most provisions of the Bill of Rights now also apply to the state and local governments.
Prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and the development of the incorporation doctrine, the Supreme Court in 1833 held in Barron v. Baltimore that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal, but not any state governments. Even years after the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court in United States v. Cruikshank (1876) still held that the First and Second Amendment did not apply to state governments. However, beginning in the 1920s, a series of United States Supreme Court decisions interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment to "incorporate" most portions of the Bill of Rights, making these portions, for the first time, enforceable against the state governments.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights
Thomas (and others) call themselves 'originalists,' so it's not really a surprise that he takes this position.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Last edited Mon May 25, 2015, 01:51 AM - Edit history (1)
Republicans will apppont people like Thomas.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I don't agree with Biden's decisions, bu he is not the one who appointed Thomas.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)to get this guy impeached?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)since there is no appeal and no work-around. Unfortunately, I doubt that women get His ear very often, if ever.
spanone
(135,795 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)I'm sure they're fucking proud of this ignoramus.
BumRushDaShow
(128,492 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,358 posts)... if his home state decided to establish Hinduism as its official religion.
cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)His kind never think about sauce for the goose.
Paka
(2,760 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Bryce Butler
(338 posts)House to bring up charges, Senate for trial.
cstanleytech
(26,236 posts)over the House and Senate.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)He's pretty young, but you never know. If you're directly responsible for killing people, on the list you go. I may be going to hell, but hopefully he's going first.
Yavin4
(35,421 posts)paleotn
(17,884 posts)Then the 2nd amendment doesn't apply to state and local govs either. State and local govs can restrict or outlaw private gun ownership. Can't have it both ways, Clarence.
drm604
(16,230 posts)jmowreader
(50,528 posts)Bankrolling Manuel Noriega was nothing compared to Clarence Thomas.
ashling
(25,771 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,026 posts)1. The Fourteenth Amendment applies the Constitution and its Amendments to the states. Constitutional Law 101 at any law school.
2. Virginia tried the state religion thing once and threw all the Baptists in jail. That's what got Jefferson excited about the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)Gothmog
(144,928 posts)This is a well deserved dishonor http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/03/24/3636905/five-worst-supreme-court-justices-american-history-ranked/
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Should states have the right to ignore the 2nd amendment as well?
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Evidently, he's not a history scholar either.