General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs there ever going to be a movie of "The Catcher in the Rye"?
J.D. Salinger would never allow it while he was alive.
Any possibility that it could materialize now?
Done correctly, it could be an excellent movie.
chev52
(71 posts)I doubt if I'd watch it. I never could even finish the book, it was so boring. I even tried to reread it after being out of high school after thirty years. Same results.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)is when you're an angsty teenager. It's not a book for happy, well adjusted kids in cornflakes families, they just won't get it.
Likewise, it's not a book for adults, who want to wring his neck whether they went through that kind of period themselves or not.
If it's made into a movie, it will suffer for being taken out of its period, for being left in a period that no teenager can relate to, for being what it is. The audience will be small and it won't be a date movie.
I agree with Salinger, I don't see how turning it into film would be a good idea, at all.
Yes loved it in my teens. Reread it last year in my 40s. Still loved it but my perspective was so incredibly different.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Holden and am in my mid-50s now, having re-read CitR several times between junior high and now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Catcher_in_the_Rye
treestar
(82,383 posts)Yes, if he hadn't opposed, I'm sure someone would have done it by now.
Could he have tied it up in his will somehow - that his inheritor loses everything if they agree to a movie. But at some point he would have to lose control of it - the Rule Against Perpetuities would kick in and it would be in the public domain.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Some people have even gone so far as to make fake trailers:
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Something else for alienated would-be assassins to carry around in their coats.