General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon’t count Bernie Sanders out (MSNBC)
5/26/2015
....Its easy to dismiss Sanders as nothing more than a niche candidate, an avowed democratic socialist with a diehard following on the far-left. Raising money will be a challenge and Sanders will rely heavily on modest contributions from grassroots donors. His outsider posture and distance from the Democratic establishment also means he wont be reeling in many high-profile endorsements. (Just last week, Vermonts Democratic governor, Peter Shumlin, snubbed Sanders and threw his support to Clinton.) Nor does Sanders have much of a campaign infrastructure in place right now.
But write him off completely at your own peril, because Sanders actually has a few things working in his favor. Theres his message, for one thing, a frontal assault on the political system and a pledge to directly combat the billionaire class. This is hardly new talk from Sanders, who has been on Capitol Hill for 24 years now, but the climate has shifted since the 2008 economic meltdown and income inequality, wealth concentration and corporate power are unusually prominent in the national debate. And with economic anxiety still high and rampant frustration with Washingtons paralysis, theres a potentially wide opening for a damn-the-system crusade like Sanders is leading.
Its more than that, though. Theres also his personality and his image grumpy demeanor, disheveled appearance, disinterest in discussing anything not related to policy, contempt for personal questions. He is the antithesis of a packaged political candidate and his authenticity is a powerful tool. Look at it this way: Former Maryland Gov. Martin OMalley, who is poised to join Sanders in the Democratic race later this week, is planning to stress many of the same economic themes as Sanders. But which one of them sounds like he means it more? Sanders team cant afford polling yet, but they are quick to point to his strong favorable/unfavorable scores in public surveys as proof of his potential appeal.
In this sense, Clintons seeming invincibility makes her the ideal opponent for Sanders. All of the attributes that contribute to her strength her bottomless bankroll, her legion of high-powered endorsers, her extensive connections to the countrys financial elite, her marriage to a former president mark her as the embodiment of the political establishment against which Sanders defines himself. Plus, her strength has kept the Democratic Partys brightest non-Hillary White House prospects like, say, Elizabeth Warren on the sidelines, making it easier for Sanders and his message to stand out.
His appeal is broader or potentially broader than most assume....
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/dont-count-bernie-sanders-out
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)O'Malley will have a strong message. As a Hillary supporter, I am looking forward to hearing what he has to say. I think his poll number will rise rapid as soon as he announces.
eloydude
(376 posts)Since O'Malley ran on a law & order platform as a mayor of Baltimore, I think the recent events from Baltimore might sour voters from O'Malley.
I like O'Malley, and had considered him at one point as my candidate, but there are some negatives that I saw that won't work for this environment.
My suggestion to O'Malley - quit while you're behind.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)RW media pointed to him being at fault. Did you actually buy into that?
He was mayor 8 years ago...
eloydude
(376 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Good Gawd! I can't believe that people actually bought in to this right wing crap!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)I think that's a first, leftofcool. I'll take it. Might not ever happen again.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)These types of statements coming from RW resources make me wanna puke!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)That posters here are spreading the right wing talking points here on DU. The same bunch went after Obama with right wing talking points, then the party as a whole, then Hillary, and now it looks like they will go after O'Malley. I guess some people just can't be happy unless they are spreading the right wing BS.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Every criticism of Hillary is branded a "Right Wing Talking Point" in a failed attempt to discount whatever issue is being discussed.
"Right Wing Talking Point" is the first club they pull out of the bag.
Is it a "Right Wing Talking Point" that Hillary was involved in the creation of the TPP?
Is it a "Right Wing Talking Point" that she voted FOR the WAR for political convenience?
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)then his time as mayor and impact there with what he put into effect is fair game as well.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Knowing there were no WMD because her husband had bombed Iraq precisely for the purpose of destroying whatever WMD Iraq may have had.
Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq (January 16, 1991)
George H. W. Bush
Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait. These attacks continue as I speak. Ground forces are not engaged.
This conflict started August 2d when the dictator of Iraq invaded a small and helpless neighbor. Kuwaita member of the Arab League and a member of the United Nationswas crushed; its people, brutalized. Five months ago, Saddam Hussein started this cruel war against Kuwait. Tonight, the battle has been joined.
much more at:
http://www.millercenter.org/president/speeches/speech-3428
transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike
CLINTON: Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.
much more at:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
more at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026211673
10:16 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.
On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign. More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense.
more at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html
see also http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6522685
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Thanks for the video.
Just reading the text from the video, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to tell them apart.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 11:30 PM - Edit history (1)
I love the efforts to minimize: "ONE vote, thirteen years ago. Sheesh!"
As though it were nothing. Incredible.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/hillary-clintons-iraq-dilemma
Give me a break. This whole thing's the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.
Bill Clinton 2008
Many Senators came to wish they had voted against the resolution (authorizing the Iraq War in 2002). I was one of them. As the war dragged on, with every letter I sent to a family in New York who had lost a son or daughter, a father or mother, my mistake became more painful.
I thought I had acted in good faith and made the best decision I could with the information I had. And I wasn't alone in getting it wrong. But I still got it wrong. Plain and simple.
Source: Hard Choices, by Hillary Clinton, CBS pre-release excerpts , Jun 6, 2014
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)He encouraged tough, law and order policing practices. Led to increased animosity between the cops and the citizens.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)People were ticketed for sitting on their own stoops. Not cool and would never have been considered in upper middle class neighborhoods. Only in the poor black areas.
merrily
(45,251 posts)O'Malley is Hillary light. His Maryland 'balance the budget on the backs of the poor' are neo-liberalesque - similarly the law & order platform. While the crisis that is Baltimore took decades to create, O'Malley did nothing to stop them. This is symptomatic of what is happening in US cities nation-wide.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)I've heard commentators say that O'Malley has a Baltimore problem.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Too bad there really won't be one, no matter how much they try to gin up Sanders' chances.
Obama and Edwards each had about ten times the campaign infrastructure in 2007 that Bernie has at this point
morningfog
(18,115 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)He substituted for Rachel the other night and worked himself into a frenzy trying to find a scandal in Hillary's emails. His guest (I think he is a writer for the NY Times) kept shutting him down.
Steve Kornacki knows as much about national politics as my pig knows about Sunday.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)If I were a pig I would be muslim or jewish to avoid the roaster. I wouldn't know much about Sunday either.
On second thought, what does that even mean?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)regardless of party, I'll have to pay more attention to him. Enabling corruption within the Democratic Party only makes us as bad as rethugs. I'm tired of it.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)comes out differently and no retractions, I wonder about his stories. This is not an attack on Kornacki because of his reporting on Hillary's emails, there have been other events not involving Hillary which have been over the line and soon proven incorrect. I like Meadow's show and I have to state further when there is new information she always corrects the report. I wish Kornacki would do the same also.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This isn't 2007. Hold on to your hat.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)all it's going to do is give the American public a bunch of time to get tired of her.
MSNBC isn't the only entity that benefits from a vigorous, healthy primary. The Democratic Party does, too.
a kennedy
(29,644 posts)how much does polling cost?? D*mn. I'm hoping once people hear about and listen to him, he'll get all the cash he needs. My first donation will be given when I get paid.
eloydude
(376 posts)I'm sure after his kickoff today, he'll start polling to see where he's at, and he should very pleased with the numbers every week
Why waste limited funds on polling this early in the game when it is not terribly relevant? Waiting until things stabilize more makes sense.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)gordianot
(15,237 posts)The far left would probably be happy with the Tax structure under the Eisenhower Administration as well as the Eisenhower position on the Military Industrial Complex and getting into wars. If anything the Sanders brand of the "far left" resembles to me real conservatism going back to the founding of the United States.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I would call Sanders just to the left of center.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I agree.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)They talk about his infrastructure - he has hundreds of thousands of volunteers and many that are working to get the word out that have not even signed up yet. A lot of it is being done from our homes and at our own expense. And all of us are donating even those of us who have very little to give.
His message is clear and to the point - no beating around the bush on the issue. And more important he has been preaching the message for 40 years not just in time for the next election.
I loved this article because finally someone was honest and called him a Democratic Socialist. Only those who want to hurt his campaign will be calling him a socialist a word that actually means little to people in the US today.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I'm making my second donation today.
glinda
(14,807 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)The REAL DEAL.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)LOL!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)The last person on TV I heard laying it out, telling it like it is, was Marianne Williamson and she is not running for president.
How inspiring to hear a candidate not parsing words, not afraid to call out the ruling class. To name names. The bonus is he does really mean it 100%.
He's up against, of course, HRC, corporate democrat, she of the $200,000 speeches to Goldman Sachs, the privileged set. But if enough of us rise up and support the man who will fight the oligarchy with all he has, who knows.
As a female I'm all for a female president, it's way overdue. I'd just much rather have someone with the views of Bernie, if Marianne ever runs I'll donate. As is, my cash is going to Bernie...I don't want another sea of Larry Summers types moving into the inner circle.