General Discussion

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts) Thu May 28, 2015, 10:37 AM May 2015

So...? the whole New York Times is considered a rightwing rag, now ?

Rather than just some contributors?

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So...? the whole New York Times is considered a rightwing rag, now ? (Original Post) HereSince1628 May 2015 OP

Context? nt el_bryanto May 2015 #1

That would require opening a meta-discussion, which is banned. HereSince1628 May 2015 #2

OK. el_bryanto May 2015 #3

No. NCTraveler May 2015 #4

They are when they don't check facts and resources. leftofcool May 2015 #5

Well, thanks. HereSince1628 May 2015 #6

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)

1. Context? nt

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:38 AM

May 2015

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

2. That would require opening a meta-discussion, which is banned.

Reply to el_bryanto (Reply #1)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:40 AM

May 2015

I just want to know if NYT is now considered a source too polluted to cite on DU.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)

3. OK.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Reply #2)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:42 AM

May 2015

Isn't that also meta?

Bryant

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

4. No.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:43 AM

May 2015

Next.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)

5. They are when they don't check facts and resources.

Reply to HereSince1628 (Original post)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:43 AM

May 2015

Which apparently they have forgotten how to do considering their latest hit pieces on the Clintons.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

6. Well, thanks.

Reply to leftofcool (Reply #5)

Thu May 28, 2015, 10:48 AM

May 2015

It seems like an overgeneralization, but now I understand where that opinion comes from....

Reply to this discussion