Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. Jim Himes (D-CT, 4th District), swing vote, decides to back TPP
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Jim Himes said Wednesday he will support President Obama's bid for fast-track authority to negotiate a new trade deal, a controversial decision that puts the fourth-term lawmaker at odds with the progressive and labor union elements in his Southwestern Connecticut district.
As one of a handful of undecided House Democrats crucial to passage of fast-track -- Trade Promotion Authority or TPA -- Himes has been the object of intense White House lobbying. He met Obama twice at the White House with other congressional undecideds and spoke to the president one-on-one on the phone.
A vote in the House could take place as early as next week.
As one of a handful of undecided House Democrats crucial to passage of fast-track -- Trade Promotion Authority or TPA -- Himes has been the object of intense White House lobbying. He met Obama twice at the White House with other congressional undecideds and spoke to the president one-on-one on the phone.
A vote in the House could take place as early as next week.
http://www.greenwichtime.com/local/article/Himes-to-support-Obama-on-trade-agreement-6305630.php
Here's that same Jim Himes talking to a fake Citibank lobbyist about a vote on Wall Street deregulation:
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2609 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT, 4th District), swing vote, decides to back TPP (Original Post)
peecoolyour
Jun 2015
OP
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)1. Primary his ass
peecoolyour
(336 posts)2. Agreed. He's one of the slimiest. nt
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)3. I wonder how much they're paying him?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)6. I guess he played the 'I'm undecided' game until the offers grew. That's one that badly needs to go.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)4. Sigh
And so it goes.
Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)7. Crooks, criminals, and liars supporting fake free trade deals?
What else is new?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)8. It's going to pass because the corporations want it too.
All this sturm und drang is for show. Money has more power than people do. We're fucked.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)9. EWW
This guy is my rep and it will be his last at a representative
first the citigroup word to word bill
now tpp yuck
Paid and bought by big $$
Divernan
(15,480 posts)10. Results of jury vote: peecoolyour, 7; bogus alerter ZERO!
Hi peecoolyour - a belated welcome to DU. You've been posting some excellent OP's! Glad you're here. In fact, you've become so influential so quickly that you are now a target of the pro-corporate/pro TPP "democrats" - have to say, this is the weakest, most bogus, unsubstantiated alert I've ever seen in my 12+ years on DU!
On Thu Jun 4, 2015, 08:59 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT, 4th District), swing vote, decides to back TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026775975
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
After reviewing this six of this individual's recent OPs, there's consistent a pattern here of copy and pasting from other sites and note posting any comment of their own. Is this a robot?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jun 4, 2015, 09:11 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No objection to the content? Quit abusing the alert system!
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A poster can simply post excerpts from an article, etc, without comment. The post doesn't meet the criteria for hiding it at all.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: That isn't grounds for hiding something. It's also something many DUers do all the time. Please don't abuse the jury system.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How about get a fucking job? Internet policing doesn't pay and is an idiots game...
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seriously?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You want me to lock this based on what? I don't think so.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT, 4th District), swing vote, decides to back TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026775975
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
After reviewing this six of this individual's recent OPs, there's consistent a pattern here of copy and pasting from other sites and note posting any comment of their own. Is this a robot?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jun 4, 2015, 09:11 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No objection to the content? Quit abusing the alert system!
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A poster can simply post excerpts from an article, etc, without comment. The post doesn't meet the criteria for hiding it at all.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: That isn't grounds for hiding something. It's also something many DUers do all the time. Please don't abuse the jury system.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How about get a fucking job? Internet policing doesn't pay and is an idiots game...
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seriously?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You want me to lock this based on what? I don't think so.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.