Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPaul Krugman: Why We Regulate
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/opinion/krugman-why-we-regulate.htmlOP-ED COLUMNIST
Why We Regulate
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: May 13, 2012
- snip -
As far as we know, Jamie Dimon, the chairman and C.E.O. of JPMorgan Chase, isnt planning anything similar. He has, however, been fond of giving Gatewood-like speeches about how he and his colleagues know what theyre doing, and dont need the government looking over their shoulders. So theres a large heap of poetic justice and a major policy lesson in JPMorgans shock announcement that it somehow managed to lose $2 billion in a failed bit of financial wheeling-dealing.
- snip -
So what can be done? In the 1930s, after the mother of all banking panics, we arrived at a workable solution, involving both guarantees and oversight. On one side, the scope for panic was limited via government-backed deposit insurance; on the other, banks were subject to regulations intended to keep them from abusing the privileged status they derived from deposit insurance, which is in effect a government guarantee of their debts. Most notably, banks with government-guaranteed deposits werent allowed to engage in the often risky speculation characteristic of investment banks like Lehman Brothers.
- snip -
Enter Mr. Dimon. JPMorgan, to its and his credit, managed to avoid many of the bad investments that brought other banks to their knees. This apparent demonstration of prudence has made Mr. Dimon the point man in Wall Streets fight to delay, water down and/or repeal financial reform. He has been particularly vocal in his opposition to the so-called Volcker Rule, which would prevent banks with government-guaranteed deposits from engaging in proprietary trading, basically speculating with depositors money. Just trust us, the JPMorgan chief has in effect been saying; everythings under control.
Apparently not.
What did JPMorgan actually do? As far as we can tell, it used the market for derivatives complex financial instruments to make a huge bet on the safety of corporate debt, something like the bets that the insurer A.I.G. made on housing debt a few years ago. The key point is not that the bet went bad; it is that institutions playing a key role in the financial system have no business making such bets, least of all when those institutions are backed by taxpayer guarantees.
- snip -
But the truth is that weve just seen an object demonstration of why Wall Street does, in fact, need to be regulated. Thank you, Mr. Dimon.
MORE[p]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 3199 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (47)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Krugman: Why We Regulate (Original Post)
Hissyspit
May 2012
OP
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)1. k/r
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)2. K&R....n/t
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)3. yup
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)4. k+r. nt
suffragette
(12,232 posts)5. Spot on from Krugman
K&R
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)6. The man's a genius.
Republicans are corrupt idiots.
Here's the link to the piece: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/opinion/krugman-why-we-regulate.html
Added to OP.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)8. K&R. It's almost like he knows what he's talking about.
Although that can't possibly be true, because he is regularly ignored by the Masters of the Universe and their government minions.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)9. n/t
WillyT
(72,631 posts)10. K & R !!! - Thank You !!!
:kick: