General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWells Fargo Has Blood on Its Hands: Desperate Man Commits Suicide After Shocking Foreclosure Mistrea
http://www.alternet.org/news/155442/wells_fargo_has_blood_on_its_hands%3A_desperate_man_commits_suicide_after_shocking_foreclosure_mistreatment_/_640x407_310x220
Norman and Oriane Rousseau were one more couple pushed by a huge, greedy bank to the brink of homelessness. On Sunday, desperate and with nowhere to go, Norman Rousseau shot himself.
This is the story of what happens when an average couple is up against a giant, wealthy, powerful bank. Unfortunately the result is what the result always is when people are on their own against the wealthy and powerful: the bank ends up with all of their money, takes their house to sell and throws them out onto the street. In this case the bank is Wells Fargo.
The quick version of this terrible story is that Norman and Oriane Rousseau of Newbury Park, California were scammed into a predatory mortgage. But they made their payments anyway, always paying with a cashiers check in person at the same branch. Then one day the bank misapplied their payment and said they still owed the money. This started a long, nasty process that led to the bank evicting the Rousseaus from their home.
Heres the shocker: right at the start the Rousseaus came up with proof that the bank had received the payment and had cashed the check. But the bank continued to claim it had missed the payment, gave the Rousseaus the runaround, started applying fees, and used it as an excuse to foreclose on the house anyway.
The Rousseaus fought back, the bank dragged it out for so long and pulled so many tricks, getting its way every step of the process, until this last Sunday Norman Rousseau finally gave up and shot himself in despair two days before the scheduled eviction, Tuesday, May 15. (The Rousseaus lawyer just said he was able to win a 2-week delay.)
tclambert
(11,084 posts)If not, then a good businessperson just won't care. Life, death, misery, who cares? Does it affect profits?
randome
(34,845 posts)That's why they usually try to avoid it.
I'm willing to bet there is more to this story than the 'short version'.
And a guy who kills himself is not very stable to begin with.
Not saying the bank is golden in this, just that there is more to the story.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)That says a lot about you.
randome
(34,845 posts)elias7
(3,991 posts)Your response says a lot about you as well
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Good, that wasn't my primary intention, just a nice extra. I've dealt with 1%er's tools at Wells Fargo and speak from experience. Screw them and anyone that sides with them. There's a new form of "bank robbery" going on and the banks are the perpetrators, NOT the victims.
elias7
(3,991 posts)Your passion is what fuels the engines of activism, but blind passion without tempered thought will not earn you a place in the driver's seat.
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. me that I don't need your approval or much give a damn about it, huh?
JHB
(37,154 posts)My understanding is that thanks to the securitization of mortgages that helped fuel the bubble, banks have less flexibility to work with mortgage holders to avoid foreclosure than they would if they held the loan in the traditional fashion. Add to that the Loan Servicing industry, for which long foreclosure procedures are a drain so they're incentivized to foreclose quickly.
Calling the guy "not very stable to begin with" is a bit harsh. Doing everything right, keeping up payments, but still being forced into ruin because of an error (or chicanery) by the bank is a pretty big last straw.
randome
(34,845 posts)But suicide is 'harsh', too. Usually the result of an emotionally disturbed mind.
We don't have all the facts in this story.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)taken a back seat to 'will we make more money on the back end from going through the forclosure? Good! Then we can abandon the property to languish and count it among our (however false) assets'
julifolo
(1 post)Depending on the rest of the story, he might have felt this had the best chance of success. And, regardless, it WILL punish BoA. They lied, and if they say they didn't lie, 99% won't believe them.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)Great-another shithouse psychiatrist. Thanks for the diagnosis.
TBF
(32,004 posts)it is an attempt to shut down the discussion. Oh the guy is crazy, bank is fine ... Typical in some circles.
randome
(34,845 posts)Shut down the discussion? I merely pointed out that we don't have all the facts.
And apparently the guy won a two week stay of foreclosure proceedings so the issue could be re-examined.
Do you think suicide is a 'normal' frame of mind?
TBF
(32,004 posts)by the system. I'm more willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt than the bank. We've seen too many cases of banks going after their profit no matter what the facts - including folks who had paid off their homes and were STILL evicted. YMMV.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)And judging by the tricks, harassment, outright lying and litigation, this must be VERY profitable in the long run.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)That doesn't seem like a democratic state to me.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)The bank was clearly in error. There must be some legal apparatus available to people of less than opulent means to appeal to.
Confusious
(8,317 posts)"There must be some legal apparatus available to people of less than opulent means to appeal to."
Nope, this is the United States. You got no money, you're screwed. You got less money then the other guy, you're screwed. Justice is $$$$$. You got the $$$$, you get justice.
BTW, "that's funny" was sarcasm.
TBF
(32,004 posts)As are a few of the comments responding. "Oh, the guy must've been unstable .." Walk a mile in his shoes, buddy. Just reprehensible.
randome
(34,845 posts)If I lost my house and my job tomorrow, I would not kill myself. Money and possessions are important to me but not THAT important.
Again, we don't have all the facts from this self-admitted 'short version' of the story.
frylock
(34,825 posts)tclambert
(11,084 posts)but not angry enough to shoot some bankers.
Aah, the surviving bankers would probably just demand more police protection, paid for by middle class taxpayers.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)steel4ever
(7 posts)My 26 year old son was laid off from his job and was concerned about his payment that month while he was transitioning to unemployment. His payment was not yet late and his previous payments had always been timely. Concerned about being laid off, he called Wells Fargo and was told to go into a temporary modification to a lower payment, because "that way, it won't affect your credit." A lie. He agreed to the process, and, at the end of the period, he was just starting a new job. At that time, he was given a surprise 8000.00 balloon payment notice by WF, and he was unable to pay it. After calling and talking with several phone representatives over a period of several weeks, he realized that none were authorized to help him with a solution. Since he was misinformed about his credit rating (it had tanked 200 pts.) and was not told about the potential balloon payment, he had trust issues with the faceless "phone people."
He went to the main branch of Wells Fargo in his city to talk with a knowledgeable loan officer and was told that the local banks did not handle those types of transactions and was told to "call the 800 number." By then, he was extremely depressed and embarrassed that he was being foreclosed on and had mentioned none of this to his family or friends. He talked to few people and became more and more withdrawn. He finally talked with an attorney, who advised him to walk away, unless he wanted to "throw money" at saving the house. Disgusted and mistrustful of his mortgage lender, he walked away.
Needless to say, his credit score hindered his searches for an apartment and he is still dealing with the aftermath. As a business person, if someone owes me money, I will work something out rather than allow a default.... unless it somehow benefits me financially. Wells Fargo isn't stupid. These foreclosures are advantageous to them in some way, and to hell with the individuals who are hurt in the process. My son's original mortgage payment was 1100.00, he's now paying 1500.00 in rent, so could have easily worked something out with WF. We can only assume that they wanted his house.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)K & R!
Initech
(100,037 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Response to xchrom (Original post)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)I'll never forget the humiliation of the poor guy as long as I live.