General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse passes bloated "defense" bill which spends much more money than the Pentagon asked for
It also abandons the deficit-cutting agreement that President Obama and congressional Republicans backed last summer. The bill also includes a ban on "same-sex marriages and 'marriage-like' ceremonies on military bases."
by Joan McCarter
The House ignored the requests of the generals and a White House veto threat today, passing their bloated defense spending authorization bill, 299-120.
The bill breaks the spending agreement made last year as part of the Budget Control Act, and spends much more than the Pentagon has asked for on programs it opposes.
That includes: a new missile defense system on the east coast keeping ships and aircraft that the Pentagon is trying to retire; rejecting the military's request for domestic base closings; and about $4 billion more than the administration and the Pentagon set as a spending limit.
And there's more, including a ban on "same-sex marriages and 'marriage-like' ceremonies on military bases." Additionally, it includes "indefinite detention without trial of terrorism suspects, including U.S. citizens, captured on U.S. soil," despite a decision by a federal judge issued yesterday to block implementation of indefinite detention as included in last year's National Defense Authorization Act.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/18/1092792/-House-passes-642-billion-defense-bill-under-veto-threat-
I thought Republicans were concerned about the deficit?
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)The rest of the article aside, it's a misleading headline.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)not what was asked for.
Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)As per Wikipedia, last year's defense budget was $683.7 billion. I can't imagine the Pentagon asking for a cut in excess of $200 billion!
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)And it's not just about what the Pentagon wants, it's about percentage cuts year over year.
think
(11,641 posts)Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)think
(11,641 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)If they did, they'd raise revenues, especially on the rich who can afford it.
gateley
(62,683 posts)money into the Military Industrial Complex than the enormous amount asked for at the expense of programs that all Americans depend on. We should ask cui bono? But we won't.
Edit : typo
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Not really. i expect the MIC to get more than it asks for, because it owns congress.
Make note of the fact that programs meant to keep people healthy and alive are being cut. While programs to kill people are being boosted.
And then ask yourself if they really care about people like you.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)and care not one iota for the poor, students, disabled, or elderly--yet they are running even with the president in the election. God help us if we have a GOP congress with a GOP president.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)A very important point to make.