General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)We've known a 20 percent correction at least was coming and finally it is starting. The market needs this.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)10:14AM
6chars
(3,967 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)edhopper
(33,564 posts)classic panic- over selling, good time to buy.
Puddy
(51 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,078 posts)If youre interested. Heres the text of Rule 48, which the NYSE invoked to smooth the open today. Heres the Cliffs Notes version:
(a) In the event that extremely high market volatility is likely to have a Floor-wide impact on the ability of [Designated Market Makers] to arrange for the fair and orderly opening, reopening following a market-wide halt of trading at the Exchange, or closing of trading at the Exchange and that absent relief, the operation of the Exchange is likely to be impaired, a qualified Exchange officer may declare an extreme market volatility condition with respect to trading on or through the facilities of the Exchange.
(b) In the event that an extreme market volatility condition is declared with respect to trading on or through the facilities of the Exchange, a qualified Exchange officer shall be empowered to temporarily suspend at the opening of trading or reopening of trading following a market-wide trading halt: (i) the need for prior Floor Official or prior NYSE Floor operations approval to open or reopen a security at the Exchange (Rules 123D(1) and 79A.30); and/or (ii) applicable requirements to make pre-opening indications in a security (Rules 15 and 123D(1)).
Dow Jones Kristina Peterson explained it pretty well in a story earlier this month. She writes that basically it means the designated market makers will not have to disseminate price indications before the bell, making it easier and faster to open stocks. The rule was approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission on Dec. 6, 2007 and has been used rarely since then.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)underpants
(182,762 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)Amishman
(5,555 posts)Not to be confused with Condition 6, which is what the dealership calls your car right before they rip you off on the trade-in
Quackers
(2,256 posts)underpants
(182,762 posts), such as which school to attend or firing someone/facing a firing, that you are deeply troubled about simply choose to unleash the zombie apocalypse to avoid having to make said choice.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Taxpayers! Do your Duty! American Austerity engage overdrive!
Banksters and Fed Friends! To the presses!
Johnny2X2X
(19,037 posts)What does quantitative easing have to do with Austerity?
Quantitative easing might actually still be needed to fight the possibility of deflation.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,365 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Though I only had one employer long ago, who made equal!! matching contributions and I quit that job one sunny day.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)First some numbers: In 2012 89 million workers were covered by defined contribution plans out of an average employed number of around 142 million, so certainly a great majority (remember some of the rest still get defined benefit pensions).
93.5% of plans offered some matching, with the two most popular being 50% of 6% of pay or 100% of 6% of pay. I've worked at 6 companies. All have offered matching programs. But my anecdote matters no more than yours.
http://www.americanbenefitscouncil.org/documents2013/401k_stats.pdf
http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet
Now can you do better? Possibly but not plausibly.
For one thing not taking advantage of a 401k/403b etc means you lose the pre-tax benefit. Most people pay higher tax rates in their earning years than in retirement, so avoiding taxes now and paying them later is a good deal. Can you overcome that by choosing better or lower cost funds? The choice of funds in 401ks is a mixed bag, but all I've seen offer either index funds or income funds, both of which are typically very low loads as all the fund manager needs to do is bung them into either SP500 or Russell2000 ready made allotments, or bonds and a few blue chip dividend stocks, no looking for hidden gems or breakout startups. Wise investors who don't want to start tracking cup and handle formations and arcane banding algorithms on their own would be well advised to go for this kind of fund anyway, so going away from 401ks means you lose pre-tax benefits and have to do more work yourself, and forgo the match most employers offer. If you are a trading genius can you make these gaps up? Well of course it's possible, but how likely is anyone that good at picking stocks to be working for a salary anyway?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Still, it's always a little troubling.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)literally. Kind of makes you wonder if some are taking advantage of China's downturn and manipulating our markets, selling short beforehand.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I don't pretend to understand the machinations of the stock market at all, but things catch my eye which seem weird and out of place. A couple of months ago, I started seeing ads with Ron Paul pushing the idea that there would be a calamitous collapse in markets this summer and people would literally be fighting each other for food. He was encouraging people to prepare (I assume that meant to divest from the market). I came across an article about those ads once but didn't really pay much attention to it. He claimed to be in consultationw with some top economists though. I chalked it up to him needing an income.
However, in late July, I noticed a post on my FB page from something called "The Event Chronicle" which was predicting a similar sort of thing to occur near the end of August with all of the aforementioned calamity being visited on mankind. Out of curiosity I tried to find out who this page belonged to but was not successful other than it is linked to an ebook called "The Event Handbook." I went to the ebook site (it sells for $11.11), but I still could not figure out who is behind this. I thought perhaps it might be linked to Paul's ads, but I could find no connection. I'm not a big one for conspiracy theories, but I do find the specificity of these pronouncements weird.
As I said, it sounds nuts and I'm not attributing events to these scams? or whatever they are. It just is peculiar and I'm curious to see if anyone else has seen the ads or knows anything about this ebook/blog.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Remember all the predictions of a market rebound in 2008 or this or that stock or a financial institution would survive so they urged people to buy even the doomed ones?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)all summer that likewise predict an economic calamity this summer.
I just keep in mind that for as long as I can remember, and I'm now 67, people are more or less constantly predicting terrible things, mostly having to do with economic collapse. And often the pronouncements are very specific. I believe there's an entire field of academic studies devoted to looking at followers of doomsday religious cults, and how the members adapt when the end of the world as predicted by their prophet, does not come about. The Seventh Day Adventists got started as a group who predicted the imminent return of Jesus Christ, and simply dropped that prediction when dates came and went without any sign of JC.
I have more than once had some true believer assure me that the end of the world as we know it is coming at some specific date.
On a secular level, dire predictions of global economic collapse seem to be very common. And we all still manage to muddle along.
Johonny
(20,830 posts)when it goes down they say, "see I was right" when it doesn't they say, "just you wait, it will go down" Pretty much a stopped clock is right twice a day.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)will eventually claim to be correct when something even slightly resembling one occurs.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)Hope I can free up some funds before it goes back up, lol.
rdking647
(5,113 posts)looking at my trading screen it looks like a mini flash crash kind of panic.
there were stocks down 10-15-20% or more. and i dont just mean high flying tech stocks
jack in the box,johnson and johnson,visa,even some real estate trusts
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)Oh well, we're still due for a major correction so I'm sure we'll still see some big dips over the coming months.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts).....a mildly disappointing day on Wall Street.
You've got to love the market. It's just a very weird thing in general.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)I don't have to give a shit about this stuff
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Especially regarding the San Francisco Bay Area where property is supposedly used as an international investment vehicle?
JCMach1
(27,555 posts)Having said that, I made thousands when I bought blue chips during the 2007-2008 recession crash...
We are nowhere near a correction bottom yet. Keep your powder dry.