Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 11:17 AM Sep 2015

Confederate general's portrait removed from Patrick County courtroom (VA)

9:27 AM EDT Sep 02, 2015

MARTINSVILLE, Va. —A portrait of Confederate Gen. J.E.B. Stuart has been removed from a Patrick County courtroom.

The Martinsville Bulletin reports that Judge Martin F. Clark issued a statement on Tuesday announcing he removed the portrait from the Circuit Court's courtroom on Aug. 19.

Clark says a courtroom should be a place that is fair and neutral. He says a portrait of a uniformed Confederate general who was a slave owner doesn't comport with that standard ...


http://www.wxii12.com/news/Confederate-general-s-portrait-removed-from-Patrick-County-courtroom/35059930

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Confederate general's portrait removed from Patrick County courtroom (VA) (Original Post) struggle4progress Sep 2015 OP
Judge’s move could ignite local debate struggle4progress Sep 2015 #1
Statement from Judge Martin Clark struggle4progress Sep 2015 #2
New home for J.E.B. Stuart portrait up to Patrick County Board of Supervisors struggle4progress Sep 2015 #3

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
1. Judge’s move could ignite local debate
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 11:32 AM
Sep 2015

Posted: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 11:31 pm

... The portrait, of Stuart in full Confederate regalia, had been displayed for decades ...

... just yards from where the portrait adorned a wall inside the courtroom, a statue of Stuart stands outside the Patrick County Courthouse, a long-standing symbol that carries far more visibility than the portrait removed from the courthouse’s interior.

The question remains: How will Clark’s symbolic removal of Stuart’s picture be taken in the town named for the Confederate general?

Our guess, backed by precedent in places where the removal of the flag has been met with opposition, is that Clark’s decision will not be well-received ...


http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/news/local/judge-s-move-could-ignite-local-debate/article_2bde831c-5123-11e5-8a2a-5335c68c0aaf.html

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
2. Statement from Judge Martin Clark
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:10 PM
Sep 2015

Posted: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 11:36 am
By JUDGE MARTIN F. CLARK JR. Special to the Bulletin

On August 19, 2015, I personally removed General J. E. B. Stuart’s portrait from the Patrick County Circuit Court’s courtroom.

This will no doubt anger, perplex and disappoint many residents of our county, perhaps even the majority of people who live here. It will be an unpopular decision in many quarters, especially given that the courthouse is located in a town named in Stuart’s honor. Still, it is my goal—and my duty as a judge—to provide a trial setting that is perceived by all participants as fair, neutral and without so much as a hint of prejudice. Confederate symbols are, simply put, offensive to African Americans, and this reaction is based on fact and clear, straightforward history. Bigotry saturates the Confederacy’s founding principles, its racial aspirations and its public pronouncements. For instance, the Declarations of Causes—the legal and philosophical grounds recited by the Southern states for leaving the Union—could just as easily be called The South’s Demands to Mistreat Black People. South Carolina, according to its declaration, felt wronged because of “an increasing hostility on the part of non-slaveholding states to the institution of slavery,” and, ironically, complained that the federal government had “denounced as sinful the institution of slavery” ...

I have heard from several of my local friends that people — like myself — who are critical of Confederate symbols need “to read the real history.” I have ... I’ve read how Confederate flags waived in the galleries after the Virginia legislature passed its racist, embarrassing and unconstitutional Massive Resistance scheme. When George Wallace proclaimed “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever,” he invoked Jefferson Davis, the “Cradle of the Confederacy” and the “great Anglo-Saxon Southland” ... There’s only one “real” history. No group or person has somehow perverted, hijacked or misstated what Confederate emblems represent. From the creation of the Confederacy straight through until today, from Alexander Stephens to Harry Byrd to George Wallace to David Duke, these symbols have always been imbued with the conviction of black inferiority ...

... I’m weary of the argument that we shouldn’t remove certain intrusive Civil War symbols because “everybody’s too sensitive and/or everybody is offended by something.” Black men and women have a bona fide, objective, fact-based, historically grounded reason to find Confederate glorification offensive, and almost all of them do in fact take offense ...


http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/news/full-statement-from-judge-martin-clark/article_64b4324e-5188-11e5-ab3f-ebd59f1b26bf.html

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
3. New home for J.E.B. Stuart portrait up to Patrick County Board of Supervisors
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:04 PM
Sep 2015

Posted: Friday, September 4, 2015 9:13 am
BY BEN R. WILLIAMS
Bulletin Staff Writer

... In a letter to Patrick County Attorney Alan Black, which Clark shared with the Bulletin, Clark said that the court system does not own the portrait; it is the property of the county.

"It will be up to the county via its board of supervisors to determine where General Stuart goes from here, and I have no say or input in terms of that decision," Clark wrote. "I’m sure many citizens and groups will have thoughts on the matter."

The portrait is safely in the county’s possession, Clark added, and the board chairman and county administrator were notified in advance of Clark’s action "so that they could begin considering the transition and discuss this topic at their next meeting" ...


http://www.godanriver.com/news/danville/new-home-for-j-e-b-stuart-portrait-up-to/article_c8f35c1a-5306-11e5-8464-77cea459d253.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confederate general's por...