General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConfederate general's portrait removed from Patrick County courtroom (VA)
9:27 AM EDT Sep 02, 2015
MARTINSVILLE, Va. A portrait of Confederate Gen. J.E.B. Stuart has been removed from a Patrick County courtroom.
The Martinsville Bulletin reports that Judge Martin F. Clark issued a statement on Tuesday announcing he removed the portrait from the Circuit Court's courtroom on Aug. 19.
Clark says a courtroom should be a place that is fair and neutral. He says a portrait of a uniformed Confederate general who was a slave owner doesn't comport with that standard ...
http://www.wxii12.com/news/Confederate-general-s-portrait-removed-from-Patrick-County-courtroom/35059930
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Posted: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 11:31 pm
... The portrait, of Stuart in full Confederate regalia, had been displayed for decades ...
... just yards from where the portrait adorned a wall inside the courtroom, a statue of Stuart stands outside the Patrick County Courthouse, a long-standing symbol that carries far more visibility than the portrait removed from the courthouses interior.
The question remains: How will Clarks symbolic removal of Stuarts picture be taken in the town named for the Confederate general?
Our guess, backed by precedent in places where the removal of the flag has been met with opposition, is that Clarks decision will not be well-received ...
http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/news/local/judge-s-move-could-ignite-local-debate/article_2bde831c-5123-11e5-8a2a-5335c68c0aaf.html
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Posted: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 11:36 am
By JUDGE MARTIN F. CLARK JR. Special to the Bulletin
On August 19, 2015, I personally removed General J. E. B. Stuarts portrait from the Patrick County Circuit Courts courtroom.
This will no doubt anger, perplex and disappoint many residents of our county, perhaps even the majority of people who live here. It will be an unpopular decision in many quarters, especially given that the courthouse is located in a town named in Stuarts honor. Still, it is my goaland my duty as a judgeto provide a trial setting that is perceived by all participants as fair, neutral and without so much as a hint of prejudice. Confederate symbols are, simply put, offensive to African Americans, and this reaction is based on fact and clear, straightforward history. Bigotry saturates the Confederacys founding principles, its racial aspirations and its public pronouncements. For instance, the Declarations of Causesthe legal and philosophical grounds recited by the Southern states for leaving the Unioncould just as easily be called The Souths Demands to Mistreat Black People. South Carolina, according to its declaration, felt wronged because of an increasing hostility on the part of non-slaveholding states to the institution of slavery, and, ironically, complained that the federal government had denounced as sinful the institution of slavery ...
I have heard from several of my local friends that people like myself who are critical of Confederate symbols need to read the real history. I have ... Ive read how Confederate flags waived in the galleries after the Virginia legislature passed its racist, embarrassing and unconstitutional Massive Resistance scheme. When George Wallace proclaimed segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever, he invoked Jefferson Davis, the Cradle of the Confederacy and the great Anglo-Saxon Southland ... Theres only one real history. No group or person has somehow perverted, hijacked or misstated what Confederate emblems represent. From the creation of the Confederacy straight through until today, from Alexander Stephens to Harry Byrd to George Wallace to David Duke, these symbols have always been imbued with the conviction of black inferiority ...
... Im weary of the argument that we shouldnt remove certain intrusive Civil War symbols because everybodys too sensitive and/or everybody is offended by something. Black men and women have a bona fide, objective, fact-based, historically grounded reason to find Confederate glorification offensive, and almost all of them do in fact take offense ...
http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/news/full-statement-from-judge-martin-clark/article_64b4324e-5188-11e5-ab3f-ebd59f1b26bf.html
struggle4progress
(118,273 posts)Posted: Friday, September 4, 2015 9:13 am
BY BEN R. WILLIAMS
Bulletin Staff Writer
... In a letter to Patrick County Attorney Alan Black, which Clark shared with the Bulletin, Clark said that the court system does not own the portrait; it is the property of the county.
"It will be up to the county via its board of supervisors to determine where General Stuart goes from here, and I have no say or input in terms of that decision," Clark wrote. "Im sure many citizens and groups will have thoughts on the matter."
The portrait is safely in the countys possession, Clark added, and the board chairman and county administrator were notified in advance of Clarks action "so that they could begin considering the transition and discuss this topic at their next meeting" ...
http://www.godanriver.com/news/danville/new-home-for-j-e-b-stuart-portrait-up-to/article_c8f35c1a-5306-11e5-8464-77cea459d253.html