General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News anchor sues Hasbro over 'demeaning' portrayal as a rodent
Source: Associated Press
An anchor for Fox News is suing Hasbro for more than $5 million over a toy hamster that shares her name and possibly even her resemblance.
Harris Faulkner sued Hasbro this week over its plastic Harris Faulkner hamster, sold as part of the Pawtucket, Rhode Island-based company's popular Littlest Pet Shop line. She says the toy wrongfully appropriates her name and persona, harms her professional credibility as a journalist and is an insult.
"Hasbro's portrayal of Faulkner as a rodent is demeaning and insulting," says the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in U.S. District Court in New Jersey.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/c9950203857e42c8b245d9a0cb22714f/fox-news-anchor-sues-hasbro-over-toy-hamster-her-name
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)win six Emmy awards. If that counts ...
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)O'Reilly's won a few awards, too.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts):/
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)The resemblance is uncanny.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Funny, if she was on MSNBC, people would say, that's racist (the doll, not the post I'm responding to). I guess it counts as to whose ox gets gored.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I like to pretend I know what people would say too.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)I read what you wrote, what you did not write is a denial.
If this was Rachel Maddow, do you honestly think people would laugh at it or would they get righteously indignant?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You've implied an additional qualifier which was absent from your original premise. There is a large difference between "this would happen" and "I think this would happen."
Regardless, my powers of prophecy are much less than yours, regardless of whether you believe an irrelevant denial is there or not.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Technically, it is another more obvious example that reinforces my original premise and yet not one denial that what I said would happen, would happen.
Care to know tomorrow's lottery numbers?
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)this is weird
i got confused reading that subthread.
Bucky
(53,998 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)What race is that hamster?
Hamsters are multi-coloured, so exactly what race is a hamster, and how is it racist to compare someone to a hamster?
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Are you honestly saying that if it was someone you perceive as on your side, you would be fine with comparing a black woman with a hamster or any other small animal? Nice case of myopia you've got there, zoom in on the hamster and forget the human.
As I wrote before, it depends on whose ox is being gored. Next time I'll include a 'trigger warning' if there is any cognitive dissonance involved.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)I hope they don't hide your insensitive post...
Clearly posting about microaggresion is a microaggresion.
Off to the Fema camps.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)if it were one of our favorites.
Anyone on Fox is fair game. Just like everyone loved to make fun of the Santorum kids (forget which one), but heaven forbid that any of our pols' kids can be fodder.
I do hate hypocrisy.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)While I agree 100% with what you wrote, I find myself mesmerized by that animated cat gif and unable to look away.
No one else will respond to you unless they also agree as no one can defend against it as a 5 second google search would reveal.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I'm posting with a number of distractions in the background at this moment.
I got that cat gif years ago on another site, a music site.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)The google reference means it would take all of 5 seconds to find the exact outrage on this site that you speak of.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I need to stop multi-tasking because I'm terrible at it.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)She looks like a fucking hamster.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Very eloquent defense of the double standard.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal] People have been using anthropomorphised animal to represent humans for forever, and there is no racial stereotype tied to hamsters, mice, etc at all.
Examples:
The Big Lebowski cast as ponies
Robin Quivers and Howard Stern as bird on the Cartoon Animanics.
Bing Crosby as a Rooster on a couple of OLDDDDDD Looney Tunes cartoons:
No one ever had a problem with any of these things. I didn't hear anyone scream racism about representing Robin as a robin.
To be racist there would have to be some racial stereotype associated with the animal. [/font]
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Even if it was Amy Schumer as the 'dumpy' one.
The point is that all sorts of people have been portrayed as animals over the years, not just black people, as other posters have pointed out to you.
If this woman was portrayed as some sort of monkey, you'd have a point.
As a hamster, you're just looking to be outraged.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)I have a point and you either don't or most likely won't see it. Give it a day or two and the howling brigade will move predictably to another manufactured outrage.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,325 posts)A) you need to get your sarcasm detector fixed. Because no one on this planet would think she , n any way, resembles that doll.
B) how is it racist to sarcastically say she resembles a cute little doll? If it was a monkey or some other traditional racial stereotype I doubt anyone would touch, even sarcastically, this nonsense with a ten foot pole. And rightly so.
C) what nonsense claim would you make if it were Rachael Maddow suing? Homophobia? Why not? It makes about as much sense as your silly claim.
Get off your non existent high horse. This is a Fox News windbag with more money than sense and probably access to Bill O'lielly's team of frivolous lawsuit filers.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)Thank you for proving my point- see below:
This is a Fox News windbag with more money than sense and probably access to Bill O'lielly's team of frivolous lawsuit filers.
I vaguely recall writing that if it was MSNBC people would whine but since it's just a Fox windbag, all is forgiven by you.
You are not really good at this are you?
tblue37
(65,336 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)but then, I like kitty gifs.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)This is a Big Story? Really, AP?
(that said, while a hamster might be a rodent, it's not an icky rodent, like a rat).
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The toy is probably an "unnamed" character that appeared in an episode or two, who got a fan name, and hasbro simply applied that name when making the toy. They adopt fan names for characters with My Little Pony figures, too.
The suit will be settled in Faulkner's favor, pretty certainly.
get your hamsters while they're there, folks
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)would eve have names were it not for those of us in the brony community.
petronius
(26,602 posts)figuring out where the name came from (and, for names of real people, at least reach out to them in advance). Hasbro seems to have dropped the ball here--they're lucky not to have an Albert Fish or somesuch in the Little Pet Shop...
lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)If I never heard of her how can there be any damage
from my, and maybe millions of others, perspective?
It's just a name they gave to a plastic toy AFAIC.
tblue37
(65,336 posts)1) to maybe get some money from Hasbro, and
2) to attempt to raise her national profile, since most people do not know who she is. Now those of us who didn't, do.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Journeyman
(15,031 posts)Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)A group of hamsters has also filed a lawsuit against Hasbro, claiming that one of Hasbro's toys links them to a Fox News Actor. They're only suing for $1 because real hamsters don't really understand the whole money thing. However, their attorneys are requesting that 8 Billion Dollars be added to the lawsuit for "reasonable expenses".
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Actually I think the hamster is kind of cute.
If Harris Faulkner had her own line of toys, whatever, she might have a case. But since she doesn't I don't think she has a case.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)lame54
(35,285 posts)she should sue Fox News
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I am certainly not going to judge this person.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)For my money, they're the aggrieved parties.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)than anyone on Fauxsnooze.
Rex
(65,616 posts)However I have no doubt someone told here she could make money off this issue so she went for it.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)She should win a judgment against Hasbro, not because the toy affects her journalistic credibility, but because they are making money off her name without her permission. I can see a resemblance between the toy and the photo of Falkner.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)Pretty silly of Hasbro to fail in its due dilligence here IMO.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)WestCoastLib
(442 posts)Can they all sue?
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)They would need to be a public figure and then the toy would need to at least resemble them a little.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)I walked by the Hasbro Headquarters everyday on the way to school. My elementary school is right next to it. My parents still live in the same house 5 blocks away. Ah memories.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)A Fox News anchor in my book wouldn't rate any higher than an arthropod.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)They did a nice rendition of her as a hamster.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)to the rodent.