Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHave Republican Candidates Huckabee and Cruz Just Committed Treason in the Kim Davis Case?
I just read an interesting blog by an American. He is very progressive and points out a lot of facts..
I wonder what you on DU think?
http://nomadicpolitics.blogspot.ca/2015/09/have-republican-candidates-huckabee-and.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+NomadicPolitics+(Nomadic+Politics)
Statements made by two Republican candidates regarding the Kim Davis case may have crossed a line by encouraging rebellion against the authority of the Supreme Court. And it's called treason.
The Outrageous Lie of Judicial Tyranny
"Judicial tyranny" was a phrase that Huckabee and Cruz both used. It has a ring to it especially people who are tired of obeying laws they don't like. But, where is the tyranny they speak of?
As a public official, Ms. Davis swore (presumably on a Bible to God) to uphold the law. At that time it was a voluntary act and she didn't ask for an exemptions based on her privately held beliefs.
Now because of her intolerance to same-sex marriage, she has chosen to violate that oath. Furthermore, being unwilling to either step down from her position or to follow the law of the land, she was held in contempt of court. So,the lawlessness Cruz talks about belongs only to Ms. Davis.
The tyrants Cruz refers to are actually the Supreme Court judges. As the Washington Post notes in an op-ed piece:
The Outrageous Lie of Judicial Tyranny
"Judicial tyranny" was a phrase that Huckabee and Cruz both used. It has a ring to it especially people who are tired of obeying laws they don't like. But, where is the tyranny they speak of?
As a public official, Ms. Davis swore (presumably on a Bible to God) to uphold the law. At that time it was a voluntary act and she didn't ask for an exemptions based on her privately held beliefs.
Now because of her intolerance to same-sex marriage, she has chosen to violate that oath. Furthermore, being unwilling to either step down from her position or to follow the law of the land, she was held in contempt of court. So,the lawlessness Cruz talks about belongs only to Ms. Davis.
The tyrants Cruz refers to are actually the Supreme Court judges. As the Washington Post notes in an op-ed piece:
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 745 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Have Republican Candidates Huckabee and Cruz Just Committed Treason in the Kim Davis Case? (Original Post)
riverbendviewgal
Sep 2015
OP
When righty does it, it is patriotic and something to discuss. If a liberal did it, they would
randys1
Sep 2015
#1
For the millionth time, please read the Constitution before claiming someone has committed treason
onenote
Sep 2015
#2
Encouraging rebellion against the authority of the Supreme Court is not treason.
yellowcanine
Sep 2015
#5
"Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, and in adhering..
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2015
#6
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. When righty does it, it is patriotic and something to discuss. If a liberal did it, they would
persecute and prosecute and destroy and so on.
We have a severely broken system.
onenote
(42,694 posts)2. For the millionth time, please read the Constitution before claiming someone has committed treason
No, they haven't committed treason. Not even a little.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)3. Uh, no.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)4. No
That's absurd.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)5. Encouraging rebellion against the authority of the Supreme Court is not treason.
Actually trying to remove Supreme Court Justices by force would be but that is another matter.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)6. "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, and in adhering..
to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." That's it. Nothing else qualifies as treason.