General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia Police Ransacked Public Apartments Without Warrants Under ‘Neighborhood Blitz’ Program
Source: Think Progress
In an invasive, war-like operation known as the Neighborhood Blitz, police officers in Stockton, California illegally searched the apartments of poor minorities and physically disabled people, according to a class action lawsuit filed Wednesday. Under the guise of standard housing inspections, armed officers routinely burst into homes with little to no warning, ransacked the premises without warrants, demanded personal information from tenants that had nothing to do with their homes, and threatened renters with arrests and homelessness.
The nine plaintiffs all of whom are African American, Hispanic, or disabled allege the Stockton PD stormed into their Gateway Court apartments and subjected them to unconstitutional searches. Rather than giving tenants 21 days notice, per Stocktons municipal code, police entered the units with less than 24 hours notice and often walked in without the permission of the people living there. Lacking warrants, the cops examined mattresses, closets, drawers, and cupboards throwing the contents on the floor. They also searched plaintiffs medications and demanded to see personal documents, including bills and rental papers. Officers would come at any time of day or night barging in when people were eating or sleeping and several searches of pregnant womens apartments were conducted without taking the womens health into account.
If tenants tried to deny entry or failed to comply with officers demands, the police threatened to arrest them, place them in homeless shelters, and shut down the apartments altogether. An armed officer was present during all of the searches.
Ultimately, no arrests were made. But the lawsuit follows a long line of complaints against the police department for its police brutality and racial profiling.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/09/10/3700184/california-police-ransacked-public-apartments-with-no-warrants-or-probable-cause-a-lawsuit-says/
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Back in the day, btw, Henry Ford and other job providers used to provide "company towns" for workers.
With a long long list of rules, and demanding the right to snoop on tenants.
so much for "liberal" California.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)They need seriously reined in everywhere.
marmar
(77,067 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)demmiblue
(36,838 posts)That was just the start. Henry Ford wanted his workers to be model Americans, and to ensure that, he created a division within the Ford Motor Company to keep everyone in line. It was known as the Ford Sociological Department (or the Sociology Department, or the Society Department, really, depending on who you ask. But you get the idea.).
What started out as a team of 50 "Investigators" eventually morphed into a team of 200 people who probed every aspect of their employees lives. And I mean every aspect.
Investigators would show up unannounced at your home, just to make sure it was being kept clean. They'd ask questions that were less appropriate of a car company, than they were for the modern-day CIA. They'd query you about your spending habits, your alcohol consumption, even your marital relationships. They'd ask what you were buying, and they'd check on your children to make sure they were in school.
Women weren't eligible, unless they were single and had to support children. Men weren't eligible unless the only work their wives did was in the home.
They were Henry Ford's personal morality enforcers, making sure that everyone who took one of his paychecks lived up to his standards. Those standards included patriotism and assimilation, especially when it came to language. This wasn't just a wanton disregard for other cultures (though that wasn't not a part of it), but rather a safety issue. In a time of massive amounts of immigration from Europe, all Ford workers had to speak English. On the factory floor, a simple miscommunication could get someone killed.
http://jalopnik.com/when-henry-fords-benevolent-secret-police-ruled-his-wo-1549625731
That $5 day came with a huge price!
No wonder Diego Rivera included this panel (lower right) in his Detroit Industry Murals:
Notice the shape of the machine works behind the man on the right (a cross between Henry Ford and Thomas Edison).
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Even referenced in Narcos this season.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)led by a bilingual crew boss....
My family's menfolk among them. Great-grandfather Benny, and probably others..
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Ironic juxtaposition of this statement appearing on the official seal on the lectern.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)The amount of money paid out for settlements due to rampant LOE misconduct is literally bankrupting our cities.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)If they need more they just raise the sales tax and the poor will pay.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)to buy dash and helmet cams. But that makes too much sense. And, they'd probably lose half their force. Oh well, I tried.
BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Land of the abuse of power.
This better be resolved in the plaintiffs' favor, or it will be Ferguson, all over again.
What were the Stockton authorities thinking??
valerief
(53,235 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)All this under the guise of a program that was supposed to protect tenants from slum landlords. An easy way to end this would be to require it be done in the same manner to every apartment in every area (rich or poor). That would wake some people up. How in the hell can this even be Constitutional?
Neighborhood Blitz? Good gawd they are even giving their programs names taken from the Nazis. How can any police force condone this? Who do they serve? Who do they protect?
questionseverything
(9,646 posts)that info should be an op
one more reason to oppose hillary
neighborhood blitz or broken windows or stop n frisk ...whatever they are calling it today is unconstitutional behavior and illegal
which is why i will never trust omalley
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Hell, this is how cops get their rocks off.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I will never understand why cops act like mobsters shaking down some marks. Never.
Omaha Steve
(99,573 posts)Good for the lawsuit!
Johnny2X2X
(19,024 posts)The purpose of this type of thuggery is to intimidate and frighten minorities, period.
rocktivity
(44,573 posts)Javaman
(62,510 posts)oh I can hear the lawyers salivating over this one.
carla
(553 posts)Why, of course. Use a term from the Nazi era to describe community policing. Americans are willing to take anything that is served up by the "protectors and servers". I hope this suit is the first in a long series of lawsuits that may help reel back in the POLICE STATE that we are under.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Now move along citizen...or else.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)These home invasions are even worse, but all police have to say to create "probable cause" is they smell drugs, heard something or a person 'looked' at them.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Ouch!!! Using the P.D.'s to do Housing Enforcement is becoming the norm. This is another one of those if there is smoke surly there is fire cases. With all of the finger pointing of the far Right about people surly taking advantage of a system,you just have to send in the Police and kick their asses to the curb. Can't be giving them our Tax Dollars for food clothing and shelter cause they read some were on the Internets that these people are criminals and they should be made to comply to some predetermined unwritten rules of society and are out of compliance. So sick of the hate in this country.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I lived with my Grandma in Chicago in the mid-90's. It was awesome. Apparently the "weapon sweeps" were unconstitutional. Go figure? This makes us safer right?
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)AFAIK Gateway Apartments are not public housing but rather privately-owned buildings with subsidized tenants. That means that the odious Clinton-era War on Drugs authorization used to sweep public housing does not apply here.
I hope the tenants win judgments.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)I feel like we went backwards in time. How long until slavery is legal again?