Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:12 PM Sep 2015

If African Americans face disparate treatment in America in general wouldn't that affect DU also?

Do we really believe that they don't face disparate treatment here? Even if to a lesser extent...

Yes, I think it's reasonable to think that this forum is more enlightened on matters of race than the society in general, but that doesn't mean African Americans are treated equally here. And I'm referring to self-identified African Americans here, although I think those who don't self identify are often affected too.

Racism is part of our history, part of our culture. When we see patterns as we have seen, do we really think African Americans are being treated here in the same way as whites?

As a white person in America, I think often the assumption in much of the white community is that racism and prejudice only occurs where it is intentional and provable. But those who experience racism as racial minorities tell us something much different, that it is far more than the one time occurrences that you can point out, but something that "colors" their entire interaction with a society in which they are a racial minority.

Do we really think that stops because we're here?



114 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If African Americans face disparate treatment in America in general wouldn't that affect DU also? (Original Post) CreekDog Sep 2015 OP
Or Women or Gay people or Muslims. But the easiest target is Black because you can see it. randys1 Sep 2015 #1
Wow! I think you nailed this one! Great post! leftofcool Sep 2015 #2
Thanks...you are cool...I used to get drunk in a town called Cool... randys1 Sep 2015 #3
Yes, absolutely, I think that's true too CreekDog Sep 2015 #7
Great point and why I am FURIOUS with white people who threaten not to vote for Hillary if she is randys1 Sep 2015 #13
I was the campaign chair in our town in 1988 for Jesse Jackson when he was running for President. jalan48 Sep 2015 #25
In the primary, hell yes, i voted for him. But when he wasnt the candidate, guess what randys1 Sep 2015 #33
True. jalan48 Sep 2015 #34
This is the attitude every DUer should have. n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #74
If Hillary wins the primary... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #50
Thank YOU randys1 Sep 2015 #51
You're welcome... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #52
Common sense yes, which is why I am suspicious of anyone and everyone randys1 Sep 2015 #53
randy, I really want to reach out to you on this. Admiral Loinpresser Sep 2015 #94
Don't have to do anything... TipTok Sep 2015 #97
So it is your intention to not live by the Terms of Service: awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #99
Jury Results (and this is not general election season and there is no chosen candidate yet) ScreamingMeemie Sep 2015 #100
I wonder who the "Hide It" was emsimon33 Sep 2015 #103
Did you read the text of the alert? awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #105
Welcome to DU emsimon33 Sep 2015 #101
So Hillary is going to be more of a Protector, BULLSHIT, Look at her history or repeat it!!!! orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #77
That's about it. In fact, it's mild. yardwork Sep 2015 #11
Bam. n/t OneGrassRoot Sep 2015 #20
Subtle racism on DU Cali_Democrat Sep 2015 #4
That should have hidden. It doesn't look very subtle to me. n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #46
nothing subtle about that JI7 Sep 2015 #48
Subtle as a brick. Starry Messenger Sep 2015 #82
Holy fuck, I had to alert on that. bettyellen Sep 2015 #98
K&R to your op and the first post in it. nt. SouthernProgressive Sep 2015 #5
Racism is a part of our whole society gollygee Sep 2015 #6
Of course, DU is affected. madashelltoo Sep 2015 #8
Yes. yardwork Sep 2015 #9
Boomers may remember this BumRushDaShow Sep 2015 #10
I remember that! yardwork Sep 2015 #12
They did recently introduce alternates BumRushDaShow Sep 2015 #16
You got to love 7 of those are close to actual skin tones and then the obligatory white as fuck one. Juicy_Bellows Sep 2015 #36
like the bandaids JI7 Sep 2015 #17
Sure do. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #41
I would think that the vast majority of DUers Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #14
do you think acting on the basis of prejudice is only intentional or can it be unintentional? CreekDog Sep 2015 #15
when do they tell us that? hfojvt Sep 2015 #18
how about acknowledging seriously significant interactions? With LEO, employers, RE brokers.... bettyellen Sep 2015 #21
Absolutely correct! tech3149 Sep 2015 #19
+1 an entire shit load. Every word. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #42
All forms of privilege exist on DU, you have to be in denial to think otherwise. LostOne4Ever Sep 2015 #22
k/r fishwax Sep 2015 #23
Hard-wired Roy Rolling Sep 2015 #24
you can either try to control it or control your definition of tribe. mopinko Sep 2015 #29
I'm glad you said that... Blanks Sep 2015 #37
Interesting. Most of what you are saying is very jwirr Sep 2015 #45
I think they gave up on busing too quickly... Blanks Sep 2015 #49
Agreed and the younger children are exposed the better. jwirr Sep 2015 #57
I'm not sure I understand you here tkmorris Sep 2015 #102
That would be one approach... Blanks Sep 2015 #108
As an interesting side note to what you wrote BumRushDaShow Sep 2015 #56
That's interesting... Blanks Sep 2015 #59
What you wrote is very true BumRushDaShow Sep 2015 #76
That is true. artislife Sep 2015 #61
Agree BumRushDaShow Sep 2015 #80
oops double post artislife Sep 2015 #61
Yes! n/t Tarheel_Dem Sep 2015 #26
Really tired of threads that make it about one group Shankapotomus Sep 2015 #27
It's not my group, I'm not African American CreekDog Sep 2015 #28
LOL gollygee Sep 2015 #32
Well, you see, whites a have privilege that black folk don't, speaking of selfish. jtuck004 Sep 2015 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author Glassunion Sep 2015 #47
Everyone is all about one group. Glassunion Sep 2015 #55
well-said, Glassunion Skittles Sep 2015 #60
Creekdog, who isn't black, is doing exactly what you say s/he should be doing. So what's your problem? n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #73
I wasn't commenting on creekdog Shankapotomus Sep 2015 #75
Apparently it does. KamaAina Sep 2015 #30
Good observation. Rex Sep 2015 #31
I think as White people we define life for POC upaloopa Sep 2015 #35
If you live in a largely white area, this is something to keep in mind: pnwmom Sep 2015 #40
Thanks for that upaloopa Sep 2015 #43
I have often thougt the thoughts in your edit. But jwirr Sep 2015 #54
If I could chime in artislife Sep 2015 #63
Excellent addition to this post and it brings up the real jwirr Sep 2015 #86
And that is compounded by the fact that 80 - 90% here are Bernie supporters, pnwmom Sep 2015 #39
interesting points CreekDog Sep 2015 #44
Maybe because fellow Bernie supporters who are Poc artislife Sep 2015 #64
I've been here for a while and never seen anything like this, in terms of the alert situation. pnwmom Sep 2015 #65
As to alert stalking. nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #67
The alerting needs a firm boundary for sure artislife Sep 2015 #68
Everybody rolls their eyes, I bet. Or the equivalent. pnwmom Sep 2015 #69
To be honest artislife Sep 2015 #70
You're welcome, artislife. And I'm glad you're here! And keep pushing for a better world pnwmom Sep 2015 #72
"White supremacy" and "White America" doesn't simply mean Klan hoods and Stormfront Chitown Kev Sep 2015 #58
Implicit bias nadinbrzezinski Sep 2015 #66
But they are crystal clear, and I share them . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #79
There are plenty of racists everywhere. Alabama, Vermont, law firms, democratic message boards alcibiades_mystery Sep 2015 #71
K&R! stonecutter357 Sep 2015 #78
I have no idea who any of you are, your race or morningfog Sep 2015 #81
K&R Starry Messenger Sep 2015 #83
Yes. No. LWolf Sep 2015 #84
That is the beauty of the internet artislife Sep 2015 #87
Yes. LWolf Sep 2015 #90
How do you find out a DU-er's race... Android3.14 Sep 2015 #85
"parade the claim" "a specific class of humans" Gormy Cuss Sep 2015 #89
Some pretty blanket assumptions there, Mr. Cuss Android3.14 Sep 2015 #91
Pretty blanket statement there, Android3.14 Gormy Cuss Sep 2015 #93
You have a name that means dirty-faced stubborn person Android3.14 Sep 2015 #96
Nope, wrong again. Gormy Cuss Sep 2015 #107
Disagree Android3.14 Sep 2015 #109
So, it's better to make up stuff based on one's biases opinions Gormy Cuss Sep 2015 #110
If you rarely consider race, gender, or sexual orientation then chances are pnwmom Sep 2015 #112
"PARADE THE CLAIM AROUND"? Making a race "claim" is adopting a label that's "a red flag"? pnwmom Sep 2015 #111
Thanks CreekDog artislife Sep 2015 #88
Not in the least loyalsister Sep 2015 #92
Yes. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Sep 2015 #95
Should we believe we can determine from internet posts whether someone self-identifies as A-A, struggle4progress Sep 2015 #104
As long as people sort, lable and categorize each other into neat little groups notadmblnd Sep 2015 #106
It likely doesn't stop here. But here we should try, in good faith, to sort out thought & language ancianita Sep 2015 #113
Now you are opening a whole new can of worms! akbacchus_BC Sep 2015 #114

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Or Women or Gay people or Muslims. But the easiest target is Black because you can see it.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:20 PM
Sep 2015

I guess Women fall into that category as well.

Of course they receive very different treatment here, hell there seems to be so few of them left anymore, it isnt going to matter.

The day President Obama was elected, the white people (not all, not all, not all, not all, not all) who dont much care for Black people, including many democrats, decided that they would feel less inhibited with their racist views.

I mean us white folks let you Black folks vote, and even let you eat where we eat, and even sometimes live and go to school where we do, but now you want to be PRESIDENT of the god damn UNITED fucking STATES?

Nope...we didnt authorize that, well actually 52% of us did but 48% of us said hell no and many of the 52% did so with the understanding that you would still know your place, god dammit.





something like that

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
7. Yes, absolutely, I think that's true too
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:32 PM
Sep 2015

Sometimes I focus on one particular unfairness, I feel like I should almost put it in my signature line to say that my focus on one particular group doesn't mean others (minorities or those who are part of disfavored groups) aren't also treated unfairly.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
13. Great point and why I am FURIOUS with white people who threaten not to vote for Hillary if she is
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:42 PM
Sep 2015

the nominee, or I should say white/str8t/males, especially.

They have so little to lose (in the short term, but much to lose in the long term) if the terrorists take over completely, so they think they can afford protest votes.

jalan48

(13,860 posts)
25. I was the campaign chair in our town in 1988 for Jesse Jackson when he was running for President.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:05 PM
Sep 2015

We heard the same arguments for why Democrats shouldn't vote for him. Ironic isn't it?

randys1

(16,286 posts)
33. In the primary, hell yes, i voted for him. But when he wasnt the candidate, guess what
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:23 PM
Sep 2015

i did.

Did you miss my part where i said if she is the nominee?

I am a Bernie supporter, but you see what I am not is a Hillary basher, because like Bernie and Thom and others have said, that would be INSANE

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
50. If Hillary wins the primary...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 05:54 PM
Sep 2015

we have to vote for her. We can't let republicans pick the next Supreme Court justice. The few gains we have made will be quickly lost.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
52. You're welcome...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 06:01 PM
Sep 2015

but it should be common sense. Whomever wins the primary is going to need all of our support. There are things I don't like about HRC, but she is light years ahead of any of the GOP Clown Car occupants. One of her pluses will be strong support of women's rights, which have been under attack for far too long.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
53. Common sense yes, which is why I am suspicious of anyone and everyone
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 06:03 PM
Sep 2015

who says if she is the nominee they wont vote for her.

If you first point out to them who will be harmed, how and why, and they still say they wont, then I say they are not liberals, not Democrats, not a friend of mine.

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
94. randy, I really want to reach out to you on this.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 02:25 PM
Sep 2015

I intend to vote for HRC if the nominee, but I have some questions for you. Do you know the significance of 400ppm and the Sixth Extinction?

The reason I ask is because I have hope for the survival of humanity as a species because Bernie is running. I believe that the likelihood that homo sapiens will be extinct in 100-200 years is very great. If Bernie is not elected, I believe we may have lost our last, best chance to save ourselves and the planet. Does this make any sense to you?

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
97. Don't have to do anything...
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 03:06 PM
Sep 2015

I won't vote for someone I find to be totally unsuited for the position...

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
99. So it is your intention to not live by the Terms of Service:
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:02 PM
Sep 2015

At least you have it out in the open early, so it's on the record

Vote for Democrats.

Winning elections is important — therefore, advocating in favor of Republican nominees or in favor of third-party spoiler candidates that could split the vote and throw an election to our conservative opponents is never permitted on Democratic Underground. But that does not mean that DU members are required to always be completely supportive of Democrats. During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect. When we are not in the heat of election season, members are permitted to post strong criticism or disappointment with our Democratic elected officials, or to express ambivalence about voting for them. In Democratic primaries, members may support whomever they choose. But when general election season begins, DU members must support Democratic nominees (EXCEPT in rare cases where a non-Democrat is most likely to defeat the conservative alternative, or where there is no possibility of splitting the liberal vote and inadvertently throwing the election to the conservative alternative). For presidential contests, election season begins when both major-party nominees become clear. For non-presidential contests, election season begins on Labor Day. Everyone here on DU needs to work together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government. If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
100. Jury Results (and this is not general election season and there is no chosen candidate yet)
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:21 PM
Sep 2015

On Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:04 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Don't have to do anything...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7164866

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Should at least be put on the radar for admitting they are not going to live by the terms of the TOS.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:15 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There is a pledge????? The poster simply spoke the truth: No one has to vote. It is up to a politician and his/her supporters to convince the voters that they are worthy of a person's vote. Most Americans no longer bother to vote because they find the system rigged and they feel no compelling reason to vote. Now, we alert on people on DU for saying that they, at this moment in time, will not vote for a particular candidate. What have we become on DU when we want to silence discussion rather than encourage it?
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing here to hide.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Come on now... Find something better to do with your time, alerter. Please.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
103. I wonder who the "Hide It" was
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:26 PM
Sep 2015

Talk about Alert Trolls! This poor person just joined DU and some are already trying to stop his/her participation. If we keep this up, only the Alerters will be left until they alert each other off the board! Between the words we can not use and the politicians we can not support, many DUers will be left with only adjectives and conjunctions with which to post on DU!

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
105. Did you read the text of the alert?
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:39 PM
Sep 2015

A hide wasn't going to happen, but it was done to get the person on MIRT's radar. Just a little over 30 posts and they are admitting they won't live up to the TOS. I have alerted on two people in the last six months, maybe more. One was blatantly racist, the other was someone who started an OP earlier this week to use every response to their OP as a callout to of least 7 members of DU before it was locked (7-0 vote).

yardwork

(61,599 posts)
11. That's about it. In fact, it's mild.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:39 PM
Sep 2015

Those rabid people at Sarah Palin rallies didn't just go away when Obama won.

madashelltoo

(1,698 posts)
8. Of course, DU is affected.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:32 PM
Sep 2015

Sometimes it's between the lines, in subtle comments or less often, blatant. No group is immune. Every time I read statements that begin with, "We 'let' you . . .", my blood boils.

yardwork

(61,599 posts)
9. Yes.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:37 PM
Sep 2015

We've been here before, as you know. Majority culture needs to remember the minorities in our community. It is easy to get complacent and not see how people feel.

BumRushDaShow

(128,896 posts)
10. Boomers may remember this
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:38 PM
Sep 2015


The indoctrination was powerful, insidious, and continues even today in many circumstances to define what is considered a "norm" and "universal" and what doesn't fit is "other".

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
36. You got to love 7 of those are close to actual skin tones and then the obligatory white as fuck one.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:33 PM
Sep 2015

Even albinos aren't that white!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
14. I would think that the vast majority of DUers
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 02:53 PM
Sep 2015

would not allow the race of a DUer to affect their decision on whether to alert on a post, or how they would vote on a DU jury. Real racists would tend to spew their filth elsewhere on the internet; I doubt that many would hang around here on DU.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
18. when do they tell us that?
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:18 PM
Sep 2015

"Those who experience racism as racial minorities tell us ..."

Where did you hear that? From a book? From a lecture? From a study? A survey? From a few people?

"their entire interaction with a society"

What exactly is interaction with society?

I guess I would break it down three ways, or maybe four.

1. Interaction with service providers - the librarian, the check out person, the store employee, the mail carrier, the city clerk, etc., etc.
2. interaction with other strangers
3. interaction with people you have gotten to know, at least a little bit, like I know Leon and James - guys who retrieve carts at Wal-mart and the grocery store
4. interaction with friends

and you could perhaps subdivide each of those interactions (although I generally wouldn't) into a) a person of your race, b) a person of some other minority race, c) a white person, d) a person of your gender (perhaps another layer of subdividing)

I note that because it one workplace it seemed like the black guy and the hispanic guy formed a group. They were like "instant buddies". I supposed they felt somehow "outnumbered" and united for "protection" but I was sorta envious. I certainly had no instant buddies. I also have noted a number of times, when a black person sees another black person, they will chat like close friends or something. They seem to have a community, whereas I feel more isolated (and that could just be my Aspergers talking)

Now interacting on DU is quite a bit different. All we have, at least at first, are names, and we all, except for admin, are pretty much equal. On any given day, a person can write a post which the people reading it either mostly like and agree with, or dislike and/or disagree with. It is only after time that one can begin to learn and remember things about various posters - their race, gender, sexual orientation, location, musical tastes, education, or whatever.

So now people can know, at least if they are not new, even before they start reading this prolix screed that they are going to hear a bunch of mansplaining and whitesplaining.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
21. how about acknowledging seriously significant interactions? With LEO, employers, RE brokers....
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:31 PM
Sep 2015

you know, the kinds of interactions that have years of studies to show racial discrimination that leads to at the least unequal outcomes and often serious consequences?
Is that somehow equal or less notable to you than noticing two POC at work being chummy? Seriously?

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
19. Absolutely correct!
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:26 PM
Sep 2015

All of us have some level of implicit unconscious bias. It takes an amazing amount of introspection to understand and try to counter it. We may be able to see it and adjust our thinking to correct for it in almost any situation but there will always be those trigger issues that let emotion overtake reason that even we don't see happening.

For that reason, I specifically restricted my involvement in the BLM and some other discussions. While I could understand and agree with positions being presented, I did not feel comfortable offering an opinion. Because I don't have to worry every day of my life because of my skin color, or sexual identity, or sexual preference, Even if I'm at the lowest social and economic point in my life, I am still living an advantaged life with respect to far too many.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
42. +1 an entire shit load. Every word.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 05:03 PM
Sep 2015
"All of us have some level of implicit unconscious bias. It takes an amazing amount of introspection to understand and try to counter it."

That is a fact. Most people don't have the foggiest notion that some level of implicit unconscious bias exists in all of us.

LostOne4Ever

(9,288 posts)
22. All forms of privilege exist on DU, you have to be in denial to think otherwise.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:47 PM
Sep 2015

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]Class privilege
Racial privilege
Gender Privilege
Cis-heteronormative-privilege
Religious privilege

They and more have all shown up on DU. AND SADLY denial of all these forms of privilege also show up here too.[/font]

Roy Rolling

(6,915 posts)
24. Hard-wired
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:01 PM
Sep 2015

We are all probably hard-wired to whatever degree to favor our own tribe. That subtle, animalistic instinct must be controlled in a civilized society. To the extent it cannot controlled, it is the only thing a racist uses in his/her interactions with others.

That is, the stupider we are, the more racist we are likely to be.

Don't be stupid.

mopinko

(70,089 posts)
29. you can either try to control it or control your definition of tribe.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:12 PM
Sep 2015

which i think is the more effective and better course of action.
i think people who manage not to be racists do so mostly by expanding their definition of tribe to include the whole human race.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
37. I'm glad you said that...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:35 PM
Sep 2015

As a hobby farmer, one of the things That I've noticed is that you can raise animals up together from babies and they get along fine. They will establish a pecking order, but they won't fight to the death. If you raise them in separate cages and then mix them, they will fight.

Those people who believe that it is human nature that we are suspicious of those 'not in our tribe' are not looking at the big picture. It's not human nature, it is a law of nature. If you take ants from one hill and put them in another hill, they'll fight to the death.

We aren't going to get along with other races, creeds and national origins just by wishing it were so. It's going to take an education that makes us appreciate the struggles of others, the culture of groups different than our own.

I think that those who believe that if we just let children grow up around people of other races that it will cure their racism are mistaken. Perhaps those youngsters raised in that environment won't respond to people of other races negatively (based solely on skin color), but they will still respond negatively toward folks from the 'outside'. We are conditioned that way from a very young age. We support our home team in sports and are encouraged to hate the people from the next town over.

If we really want to solve this problem, we have to understand it. The military takes all of the recruits in and gives them the same haircut, regardless of social status and often strong friendships are formed between people of completely different backgrounds. When one is separated from their group and forced to form bonds within a group of total strangers, I think they gain an appreciation for people from different backgrounds.

Perhaps we should do something like this to young adults as part of their education. I'm sure a lot of people would object to such a program, but I know my exposure to people from different places with different backgrounds contributed to some degree of personal growth.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
45. Interesting. Most of what you are saying is very
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 05:30 PM
Sep 2015

apparent in my extended family where we have a lot of mixed marriages. Learning to live together is a big part of having a good marriage in these cases.

On issue I have some trouble with is the idea of being separated from the group and forced to form bonds within a group of total strangers. Didn't we do that by busing children from one neighborhood to another as a result of the Civil Rights movement? I have heard many say that did not work.I was not bussed so I do not know if it worked.

I do know that many of my attitudes learned in a totally white neighborhood did change drastically in college interacting with other students from different races and cultures. I think it works better if the issue of force is not part of the equation.

How to implement this idea across the nation is a very big question. Maybe some of this could be a result of better housing regulations that end discrimination that keeps segregation alive. Also better educational opportunities for minorities so that there is more interaction like I had in college.

I do not begin to know how to work out these ideas.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
49. I think they gave up on busing too quickly...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 05:48 PM
Sep 2015

And it also didn't contain the most important parts of it. The non-bussed kids were allowed to have classes with their friends. They didn't have to have identical hair cuts, wear identical clothing, they weren't torn down as individuals and then built up as a team.

All of the elements that are involved in team building were not included. They just shipped kids across town and hoped that they would be accepted.

I certainly don't claim to have the answers, but if at first you don't succeed.... We are supposed to keep trying.

College is another example of being exposed to diverse groups, but if you're wealthy, you can go to college and have all of the same friends that you had in high school (or 'new' friends from the same demographic as yourself). We need a system that has exposure (and appreciation) for others built into the system. It must be part of our education system.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
102. I'm not sure I understand you here
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:22 PM
Sep 2015

"They didn't have to have identical hair cuts, wear identical clothing, they weren't torn down as individuals and then built up as a team. "

Are you advocating for such an approach, or am I reading this incorrectly?

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
108. That would be one approach...
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 08:19 PM
Sep 2015

I'm not sure it would always be necessary. I think busing is doomed to failure without some attempt to make all the students seem more equal. We need to make the kids be a part of mixed groups and discourage them from hanging around with just their friends from their demographic, but I wouldn't have a problem with making kids wear uniforms and have a haircut standard. My kids wore uniforms in (public) school, haircuts wouldn't have been a huge issue.

Again, I don't know that it would always be necessary, but it kind of levels the playing field. It makes all kids look the same, or at least the less fortunate don't stand out as much.

It's just one of the team building methods that the military uses. I expect that there are people who would oppose such a policy.

BumRushDaShow

(128,896 posts)
56. As an interesting side note to what you wrote
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 06:13 PM
Sep 2015

As a POC who has traveled to different countries over the past 45 years, I have found that outside of the U.S., when white &quot U.S.) Americans" run into &quot U.S.) Americans" of color in those other countries in a tourist setting, a lot of the usual overt prejudicial behaviors by whites to POC that are sometimes fully displayed here in the U.S., suddenly disappear, and "commonalities" as &quot U.S.) Americans&quot are found in an attempt to bind the two groups together amidst what is a different (but majority) "other" group that is not &quot U.S.) American". I.e., this is an ad hoc "safety in numbers" move outside of the U.S. that fascinates many of us POC due to the sheer irony of the shifting allegiances and behavior when whites become a temporary "minority" (in this specific case, by nationality).

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
59. That's interesting...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 09:09 PM
Sep 2015

But allow me to add that in my experience those white people who travel tend to be less racist anyway.

To a person, my 'friends' on Facebook (I'm from a small Pacific Northwest town) that left home either for college or for the military tend toward less racist behavior, than those who never left town.

Additionally, anyone that I've ever run across that has been in the military can talk with another veteran about their military experience regardless of race (branch of service is more of a difference than race), it's the largest fraternity in the world.

I believe what you're saying is true, and I can't claim that my experience (with small town folk) is universal, but if you think about it, it makes sense because so many of those who never left the comfort of their small home town, are afraid of the unknown, and POC are an unknown to them.

BumRushDaShow

(128,896 posts)
76. What you wrote is very true
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 06:59 AM
Sep 2015

and I think is key. It seems too many have rarely or never ventured outside of their communities and this goes all ways. And given the one-time de jure and current de facto housing segregation (often also due to preferences to live with others sharing cultural commonalities versus for any nefarious reasons), a lack of contact tends to be reinforced.

When I was hunting around for some other info, I stumbled upon this Atlantic article from a year ago that had some interesting stats and graphics - notably this graphic that seems to fit into this subthread -

[font size="3" face="serif"]Racial and Ethnic Makeup of White Social Networks[/font]



In the past, other than travel, the main way groups were able to communicate to the "outside" was via the use of "pen pals" (and even the "message in the bottle" type of communication). Many of us boomers (and older) may recall having foreign "pen pals" where sharing of info about oneself was carried out. Often the "pen pal" model was also used between schools around the country as well. Now thanks to the internet, that sharing is happening 24/7 real-time via all the social media, discussion forums like this, and even through audio/video chat functionality. And perhaps having finally broken a barrier to communications, maybe the younger folk can interact with someone "not like themselves" long enough to form their OWN opinions before "society" gets chance to overlay and impose the same old FUD and denigrating stereotypes about "others" that have ruined almost every chance of positive relations between people of differing circumstances.

This type of real-time interaction thanks to the internet, also needs to happen with enough frequency to drown out the constant "traditional" media barrage of misinformation and vile spewing of reworked stereotypes that have hindered any progress in social interactions bent at improving understanding of others with differing worldviews.

A couple days ago, I heard a commercial on the radio (I think for T-Mobile) that included a catch phrase "The revolution will be mobilized" (in reference to mobile/cell phones). And I thought it was an interesting pun but perhaps a ticket to better relations - assuming that it isn't hijacked (which has happened to a certain degree) to continue to drive people apart rather than bring people together.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
61. That is true.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:10 PM
Sep 2015

I am of Mexican and Native descent on my father's side and Irish on my mother's. My father had a difficult time because he was quite dark and growing up in southern California was hard. But when we went overseas, he had no problem. He worked with a lot of Americans who had some deep cultural biases but were well cool when they were not in their natural habitat.


Funny aside, I was traveling in Italy and I was with Italian friends. There was a button with a saying that I wanted but the store owner didn't want to sell to me because I was American. Once my friends told him I was Native American, he gave it to me.

BumRushDaShow

(128,896 posts)
80. Agree
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 07:37 AM
Sep 2015

notably about what some folks overseas think of "Americans" and "American sub-groups". We often start off as "all" being dubbed as the blanket "American", but then shifts start to happen based on race, ethnicity, etc. I saw that in Egypt, although in one town, from a negative standpoint. Our large group of AAs (100 of us) were called the n-word by residents of one Nubian-ethnic town. The n-word was in essence associated with an "American of African descent" versus anyone of black African descent (like themselves, most of whom were darker in skin tone than any of us in our group). This odd occurrence is the result of a century of egregious brainwashing of stereotypes used to divide and conquer within the tourist industry of that country. From our perspective, we knew had any of them come to the U.S., they would immediately be dubbed the n-word themselves by the racists among the majority population here - at least until they "opened their mouth" and spoke with some sort of accent, which then immediately shifts them into a different category of the convoluted racial/ethnic hierarchy that has been put in place here by the PTB of the majority population. However this trip was pre-"Web" (1992), so since then, with a proliferation of internet social media, etc., the sentiment may have (hopefully) shifted.

Oddly, the same type of sentiment has been expressed by other groups in the African diaspora until recently - where American blacks were essentially separated from the rest of the diaspora and singled out for special denigration by those other diaspora groups (who were the majority population in their countries), in the same way that white Americans denigrated black Americans. The counter to this has been the "world tours" of many black American performing artists attempting to bridge some gap in perception (although sometimes also unfortunately reinforcing some of the very stereotypes we are trying to get rid of).

Within the African diaspora, the issues of ethnicity and ethnic identification are as strong as that within the European diaspora (those in Florida may see some of that played out between the Jamaicans and Haitians and even black Cubans in south Florida). This is why it is important to get ahead of the negative and damaging societal brainwashing and get people talking across these divides before minds are closed for good.

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
27. Really tired of threads that make it about one group
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:10 PM
Sep 2015

As if "yours" is the only group facing problems. And it's so predictable how the allegiances line up. Everybody is politically and vocally active for the group they fit into and accusatory towards anyone who doesn't fit into their group demographic.

And all it ends up being is a bunch of different groups experiencing problems accusing each other of discrimination.

And then to make things worse, when someone steps outside the ego-centrism of their own group to help transmit the message of another group, they are accused of trying to speak for a group of which they are not a part.

Cross group assistance is effectively prohibited while, simultaneously, accusations that the outsiders of any particular group are not doing enough.

So you're not doing enough and you can't help either.

How about this?: Everyone save their most vocal and aggressive activism for a group demographic we ourselves don't fall into?

When you think about it, banging the drum of the cause we personally belong to to the point of pushing other groups away and their problems under the rug, is kind of obviously self-serving and selfish.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
32. LOL
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:23 PM
Sep 2015

If you are African American, you're told to shut up, but most of us who aren't African American who have posted about racism have also been told to shut up, specifically because we aren't African American.

The end result is that no one talks about racism. Clever trick.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
38. Well, you see, whites a have privilege that black folk don't, speaking of selfish.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:45 PM
Sep 2015

They are responsible for slavery, and racism - which didn't exist in this uniquely American form before we killed off all the native people and stole their land and wealth so we could live here. And while we are all mostly all victims of bank$ter/donors and their lapdogs in office, black skin has a special meaning, and has a target painted on it from the moment it is given life in this country.

Most white folks have never seen fit to change that. And judging by the bodies in the streets, or hanging from the trees, white folks don't seem to have what i take to end what they started. Perhaps they are selfish about their privilege?

Not something the privileged white folk need to concern themselves with. Except when they are the murdering assholes committing the homicides against unarmed black folk. Many times for the same "crimes" that white folk walk away from every day.

It's ironic that you talk about "selfish". This is one of the single most selfish posts I have seen in a few days.

Response to Shankapotomus (Reply #27)

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
55. Everyone is all about one group.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 06:13 PM
Sep 2015

CreekDog is not a "member" of said group, but she is a supporter. Just like I'm not a woman, but I'd like to think that I am sensitive and supportive to their struggles. You see, I'm black and have that working against me, however I am a male and have that working for me. What is wrong with using what works for me to fight what works against others?

You see the world listens to old white guys. Rarely beyond class and being able bodied, do they have anything working against them. If an old white guy listens to and acts for those who are neither, then they are using their privilege to make a positive change. But if there is no voice to be heard, if no one speaks up, you're stuck with the status quo.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
73. Creekdog, who isn't black, is doing exactly what you say s/he should be doing. So what's your problem? n/t
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:56 AM
Sep 2015

Shankapotomus

(4,840 posts)
75. I wasn't commenting on creekdog
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 06:58 AM
Sep 2015

I was commenting on Liberals whose contributions and energies to bettering humanity seem to always go towards their own demographic.

There's an element of egocentricity to it no matter who you are.

If the problem is other people not extending themselves to understand and help you, try focusing on others and show them how it's done.

If you're experiencing misogyny, help the disabled.

If you're encountering racism, make the advancement of women's rights your primary cause.

When we make any change just about ourselves, we create lines that conform only to demographics that only get wider and wider.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
35. I think as White people we define life for POC
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:28 PM
Sep 2015

in ways that suit our vision of things. I know I thought I was pretty enlightened until Michael Brown was killed and life in Ferguson was brought out into the open. I was ok with the Confederate symbols most of my 69 years and never gave a thought to how the AA community felt about them.
So there is racism even if you don't intend there to be. The racism of ignorance about what is going on around you every day. Only when we White people admit we have a lot to learn and are willing to listen instead of thinking we know what is what will we be able to make a commitment to less racism in this country. As an example taking the point of view of POC toward Confederate symbols even if they were benign to you all your life. That's how I see it today.

On edit:
We moved into a new housing development. We met one of our new neighbors who is a Black woman. Her sons are contractors and we asked if they could give us an estimate on some work we want done. They came over last night and I showed them what we need done. I could not stop thinking they are Black and I am White what do they think of me. I don't know what that means but I wanted them to think about me what I wanted them to think which is I am not a racist. I can't make them think what I want anymore than they can me. But I just can't get over the idea that we are different. I know I would not think that if they were White. I had similar thoughts when some Hispanic men worked in our back yard. I so want them to see I am not a bigot. That is the White man's dilemma I guess .

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
40. If you live in a largely white area, this is something to keep in mind:
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:57 PM
Sep 2015

Even though this is a novel experience for you, it is probably NOT for them. They are not uncomfortable working with white people because white people constitute the majority of people in the area.

In other words, they're probably not overthinking this. You should try not to , either.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
54. I have often thougt the thoughts in your edit. But
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 06:10 PM
Sep 2015

the other day I read a post that suggested that we should somehow deal with people in a way that ignores our differences. Does not see the black, brown or white. The gender or sexual orientation.

At first that sounded good to me but then I got to thinking.

How do we do that without giving up our identity? Some of my grandchildren are Native American. The white culture has spent centuries trying to force them to give up their identity. Their ways. Likewise, my black nieces and nephews are proud of who they are. And that is also true of the Hispanic and Asian parts of my family. And truthfully, I do not know how not to be white.

And as a woman I do not care to be known as anything else. And let us face it the homosexual community has fought for their right to their own identity for many decades.

So this is not about ignoring our differences. It is about accepting our differences as natural and acceptable. It is about building a society of acceptance and respect. And learning how to meld all of our ideas and ways into one workable society.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
63. If I could chime in
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:25 PM
Sep 2015

As I have continuously stated but realize that many may not know, I am half brown and half white.

Race matters in this country.

It affects every single day in one way or another. We have to see color and how it translate to experience in this country. We have to really get it and do what we need to do to create real equality. So when I hear someone say they see no color, it is as if the struggles that impact a life in a million different ways do not exist. They do.

My life is pretty good, I live in an area where they don't hate Mexicans. I look friendly and am too amiable, maybe---true in real life I try to be safe.

I have been treated well on this site. Any time someone wants to tangle with me, I feel they do because they disagree with me and it isn't about who I am but who I support. I must say that I have seen targeted people because they brought a different experience to the threads, experiences that make people uncomfortable but real. I ask my white friends who think that racism is over and blah blah blah...I ask them, "Imagine you were Black and what differences in your normal day would there be? How would strangers react to you?" If they are honest, they would know that there is a huge, HUGE difference of experience.

I don't know why it is painful to some white people to acknowledge that. I don't get it.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
86. Excellent addition to this post and it brings up the real
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 10:52 AM
Sep 2015

problem that occurs whenever we want to discuss race.

Being white I think a discussion like this is scary to many white persons. I think that they think they are going to lose something if things change. Most likely that if change comes they will lose supremacy.

Well they certainly are because no one should have supremacy because of the color of their skin in the first place. I can just imagine if I were to tell my family that I was the boss because I am the white one. I would be lucky they ever talked to me again.

Another aspect of this is that is what I call self-idolatry. The love of ones self. The "I" factor. This is more prominent in those who outwardly profess the cause of white supremacy. It is also found in white rw churches.

Even I wonder if when minorities take over, and they will due to the growing numbers, if it will be a time of vengeance or a time of the real change we need for equality. I think it will totally depend on how change comes about.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
39. And that is compounded by the fact that 80 - 90% here are Bernie supporters,
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 04:53 PM
Sep 2015

but many fewer African Americans support Bernie, just as in real life.

So when Bernie supporters attack Hillary people, they might not even realize they're attacking a black supporter.

And people in juries who have a conscious or unconscious bias based on their preferred candidate might not realize that they're alerting on and voting to hide posts by African Americans.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
64. Maybe because fellow Bernie supporters who are Poc
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:35 PM
Sep 2015

reveal themselves to me, I have to say there are quite a lot of us on this site. We are just not as established as some of the names who have hidden and booted.

So, I don't alert. It is just a decision I made from the get go and I am pleased with it, but those who do alert are they not allowed to alert AAs only because they are AAs? Does this also include other PoCs or LBGTs ? Is that what you are saying--not being snarky...because every race or group of people can say something that is not civil. I do agree that just because you don't agree with what someone is saying, that is no reason to alert and if someone is telling you a truth about their experience that is also NO reason to alert.


Disclaimer:

I have to admit, the alerting thing is well out of hand.
I think we should only get 2 a month and if we don't use it, tough.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
65. I've been here for a while and never seen anything like this, in terms of the alert situation.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:46 PM
Sep 2015

And I've been shocked to see some of the AA posters who have had posts hidden or gotten suspended because they are very seldom among the worst offenders.

I'm not saying being black should exempt someone from alerts. But if you wouldn't alert on or attack someone face to face -- as I don't think most Bernie supporters would do -- then you shouldn't do it online, either.

I believe you that there are significant numbers of black Bernie supporters here. But my impression is there are still more HRC supporters. And we shouldn't be alienating each other, period. We all want to get through the general election together, right? So tossing insults for months during the primaries doesn't help.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
67. As to alert stalking.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:55 PM
Sep 2015

I have...even experienced it. As to the bullying, I have.

Until the owners get a grip that it is happening the circle of victims will continue to grow.

The owners continue to say it is not happening. That goes for the bullying as well. Well, I pointed to the owners a few times this was getting out of hand...the last time I did...after Comicon 3 years ago, when I offered to send MP3 files, raw mind you, from experts. Instead I got rebuffed and blamed.

So this is...kind of sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

It is happening...but it has for years. It used to be far more...shall we say targeted. It's expanding. Why? The people who do this shit do not have anything to really fear.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
68. The alerting needs a firm boundary for sure
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:00 AM
Sep 2015

I know I get excitable about my candidate, so I won't try to come off as a balanced, serene poster. It is kind of the underdog mixed in with just really scared about the future of this planet and, you know, ego.

However, I am appalled at the Bravenak situation, I don't get the 1 Strong man boot and I know when I have ventured into the AA group that there are a lot of dispirited members. It is crushing to read their words and their experiences here. I do think the site really needs to curb the ability to alert. I think it leads to a rush that some posters get in shutting down voices. That grows into a big ball of shite and people do get hurt.

I used to think that adults on a site like this didn't, but I have come to realize that hearts and souls are being trampled.

The thing I would like to add is that even if it is heavily on the Sanders side because of sheer numbers, it happens back. I spent the first month being swarmed by 5 or more posters again and again. And a few nights ago, a pretty well known H supporter sent me two emails and at least one to another Bernie supporter. I say, email is for building community and GDP is for stating your opinions..

So even if we do not always see eye to eye, I would never try to shut down your voice or trample your heart. And that goes for every other poster. The ones that get to me, I try not to read to deeply and have only one person on ignore.

I can't say I don't roll my eyes a lot, though..oh well.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
69. Everybody rolls their eyes, I bet. Or the equivalent.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:26 AM
Sep 2015

There has to be some way to vent!

I started going into the AA forum when the BLM thing happened and I was looking for more information. (I'm sure I'd probably posted there in the past, but accidentally -- I don't always notice what forum I'm in.) And the atmosphere there, though sometimes sad and dispirited, also seems a lot less toxic than much of DU. I can breathe there. No one's going to jump on me because of what candidate I'm leaning toward or not leaning toward. No one expects to end up with a candidate who's perfect. There's some healthy skepticism.
'

On the other hand, I understand why someone young like you has to fight as hard as you can. Of course you do! That's what young people are for! It's a question of how you focus the drive and energy and righteous anger.

What I can't understand about this alerting thing is why they allow outsiders to hide posts written by group members -- in what's supposed to be a protected group. How could Number23 get a post hidden in her own group? This is crazy.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
70. To be honest
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:43 AM
Sep 2015

Because of the ville behavior here and elsewhere of some Bernie supporters, I don't feel that with my signature line I should post there. I have recently because I came in via Latest thread and didn't realize at first. Bravenak was the only regular AA that I had any real communication with. That's because Bernie so black was hilarious at first. Even when I was posting all over the group threads to knock off the indignant threads..I didn't get much back up. But I soon realized that that group had already alienated a lot of AAs before who were supporting Hillary.
I do in my heart of hearts believe he is our best chance so I have to try to get him elected.


Thank you for having a real discussion with me.


pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
72. You're welcome, artislife. And I'm glad you're here! And keep pushing for a better world
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:54 AM
Sep 2015

and don't ever give up.

Chitown Kev

(2,197 posts)
58. "White supremacy" and "White America" doesn't simply mean Klan hoods and Stormfront
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 07:49 PM
Sep 2015

It is systemic.

Please repeat after me...it is SYSTEMIC.

It affects all of us in everywhere that we go and in everything that we do. It affects our perceptions and the way we view the world.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
66. Implicit bias
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:48 PM
Sep 2015

and the extent of the conversation I intend to have here on this critical subject...my views are not wanted...

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
71. There are plenty of racists everywhere. Alabama, Vermont, law firms, democratic message boards
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:45 AM
Sep 2015

E'r'wher'.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
84. Yes. No.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 08:35 AM
Sep 2015

Yes, it affects DU, because DU is made up of people. People, for the most part, who are part of American society. White DUers are members of white America.

No, because, at least for some of us, we haven't, maybe until now, seen color.

I've learned this season that that is an inflammatory statement. I don't mean it that way.

I mean this: until this primary season, I'd never actually dropped in to the AA forum here at DU. Posters have been, for me, mostly anonymous. I haven't seen color at DU; I've seen an anonymous DU handle and an avatar of some kind. Those things don't usually indicate race.

So, in general, unless a poster talks about his or her own race or gender, I'm not going to know. My responses are based on what they said, not who they are, because I don't really know who they are.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
87. That is the beauty of the internet
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:45 AM
Sep 2015

People can "hear" your words without their bias filters until they can peg you into a catagory. If you wish to remain genderless, ageless, raceless -you can. Your words will sometimes reveal you, (I mean you as a general you--not a LWolf you) but you can be careful not to reveal.

I find it funny that my mind gives a gender and a voice to the words of posters...and how wrong I can be when I find out the truth.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
90. Yes.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:19 PM
Sep 2015

Many DUers have assumed that I'm male, which is not the case, and I've done the same, assuming the wrong gender.

I never really thought in terms of race, though. I think that's probably a good thing in this setting.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
85. How do you find out a DU-er's race...
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 08:43 AM
Sep 2015

Unless they parade the claim around? And even then, you have no idea if the person's claim is true.

It's a bit like the posters who put "liberal" or "vet" or some such in their handle and then use the label to behave in ways contrary to reasonable discourse, such as browbeating people, or implying someone who disagrees with the claimant is against whatever class of humans to which the label refers.

Just as there are honor thieves benefiting socially from the false claim of veteran status, there are people who make false claims in other areas.

For many people, posters self-labeling as a specific class of humans is a red flag and reason to regard the poster with caution.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
89. "parade the claim" "a specific class of humans"
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 12:19 PM
Sep 2015

You say those like it's a bad thing to qualify one's experience, opinions, and political stances based on real life.

However, let's talk about what happens when DUers don't mention their traits. White DUers assume everyone else is white. American DUers assume all DUers are too. Based on stereotypes of debate style, DUers assume they can tell who is male and who is female. DUers assume that other DUers are cis-gendered and straight. IOW, DUers ending up assuming a lot when information is lacking.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
91. Some pretty blanket assumptions there, Mr. Cuss
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:09 PM
Sep 2015

Do you have evidence that Du-ers make these assumptions that everyone is like them? I go with the editorial voice of the poster and context clues and rarely consider race, gender, sexual orientation, etc.

For example, if your statement about DU-er assumptions were correct, then we wouldn't be having a conflict over the nominee or the behavior of BLM a few weeks ago. We would all be assuming other DU-ers were of the camp within which we consider ourselves. Since this behavior is not the case, it is a strong argument that DU-er assumptions do not follow the pattern you described.

There is a difference between qualifying one's experience and "parading the claim". I might state in a post that my parents raised me Catholic in order to qualify my statements. But if I promoted the unproven claim of expertise through the username Pedophile_priest_victim, and I used that handle to gain an undeserved advantage in order to browbeat others, attack Catholics in general, and whine about mistreatment when someone declines to bow down to the expertise I supposedly bring to the discussion, this would count as parading the claim.

We have some on this board who pretend expertise in certain areas, or having topical cultural experiences, but when you interact with those folks for a brief period of time, it becomes obvious they are persons playacting fake personas as a result of mental and emotional issues. Some are certainly high functioning sockpuppets, but they are still puppets and their posts are useless, or worse.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
93. Pretty blanket statement there, Android3.14
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:51 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Sat Sep 12, 2015, 07:51 PM - Edit history (1)

You just proved what I wrote by assuming I'm a man.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
96. You have a name that means dirty-faced stubborn person
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 02:53 PM
Sep 2015

Seems and sounds like a masculine name.

Actually, I practiced what I wrote, judging editorial voice and the words "Cuss" and "Gormy" to infer you were a man, rather than a woman. If I am wrong in my inference, please accept my apology.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
107. Nope, wrong again.
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 08:02 PM
Sep 2015

It means awkward, klutzy odd person in a regional dialect. I've explained that to any DUer who has asked. You're not the first DUer who just assumed that it was a masculine characterization.

That's why it's helpful for DUers to parade claims of membership in specific classes of people. Helps cut down on the wrong assumptions.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
110. So, it's better to make up stuff based on one's biases opinions
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:43 PM
Sep 2015

without regard to admitted traits?

I'm sorry but the only polite response to that is

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
112. If you rarely consider race, gender, or sexual orientation then chances are
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:52 PM
Sep 2015

you are one of the privileged minority.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
111. "PARADE THE CLAIM AROUND"? Making a race "claim" is adopting a label that's "a red flag"?
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:50 PM
Sep 2015

So a black DUer who is willing to speak from experience about being a black person in a predominately white culture is "parading" and should be regarded with caution?

Whoa.

This is offensive and you should consider self-deleting.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
88. Thanks CreekDog
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 11:47 AM
Sep 2015

This was an enjoyable discovery of ideas and thoughts by many posters to read. It felt like a.....discusion.

Wow!

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
92. Not in the least
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 01:33 PM
Sep 2015

We live in, and are products of a white supremacist society. We all have conscious and unconscious biases. Confronting our personal biases without shame is the only way to be a part of challenging them on a broader level.

The results of these tests surprise a lot of people....

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/research/

struggle4progress

(118,281 posts)
104. Should we believe we can determine from internet posts whether someone self-identifies as A-A,
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:33 PM
Sep 2015

if the posts don't say so explicitly? Should we believe there is some distinctively A-A way of expressing oneself in writing, for example?

And given that internet trolling occurs regularly, how much credit should we give to internet identity claims? If I say I'm a 28 year-old self-made multimillionaire posting to DU from my yacht in the Mediterranean via satellite phone, should people believe me?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
106. As long as people sort, lable and categorize each other into neat little groups
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 04:54 PM
Sep 2015

you'll have bias, prejudice, bigotry, xenophobia and racism.

We see it in action here every day- but it is not limited to black white
We got yer gun people and anti gun people
You got your man haters
Ya got your woman haters
Ya got your HRC haters
Ya got your Sanders haters
I'm certain the list can be added to.

And each and every group is filled with nothing but animosity for each other and nothing anyone says ever changes anyone's minds. It just a huge contest of lets see who can claim a superior level of humanity because they're convinced that their thinking is the only thinking that can be right, and to see who can one up each other by being the meanest and nastiest.

ancianita

(36,032 posts)
113. It likely doesn't stop here. But here we should try, in good faith, to sort out thought & language
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 12:27 AM
Sep 2015

habits trained into us, one of the least examined being that many of us need to see ourselves as white, attached to the habits of speech and thought that show that we're safe from a million things that exhaust the conscious minority person, including our sense of own self importance.

When every little thing has to get explained -- from definitions of racism vs. prejudice, from affirmative action, to civil rights history -- to someone who won't even do some minimal reading of African American history, or Black Literature classics, or show an awareness of how the drug war has re-created a new permanent caste system for 15% of our country, it's exhausting to even bother with talking to them. Background exposure is important to discussing.

I'd suggest that the AA group come up with a basic reading list for DU, so that members can journey here with some common language and understandings.

Everyone here has been born into this evil, rigged system -- the racist founders, documents, the myths and lies we've believed under cover of science, culture, institutional racism -- and we owe it to each other to sort that out.

Yes, we are responsible for a system we didn't make. Not to try is to perpetuate the total alienation that most African Americans feel already.

It's painful, all the learning, reading, lurking, questioning, caring. It's also a good suffering that might lead in ways we'll never know to alleviating more suffering that's all around us that we've been dreamily blinded to.

akbacchus_BC

(5,704 posts)
114. Now you are opening a whole new can of worms!
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 12:36 AM
Sep 2015

Black DUers on here are treated with so much disrespect, it is unbelievable!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If African Americans face...