Pretty odd that on 9/11 a FREAK accident sends a BIN LADEN crane crashing through the holiest mosque
in the world, in the holiest Islamic site in the world, during a FREAK electrical storm. That's right the effing crane is owned by the Bin Laden's.
Hmmm. Seems like, whatever god is the real god, isn't too happy with the fact ISIS asshats and those who fund them are committing atrocities in it's name. Just sayin.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3231117/At-62-people-dead-crane-collapses-Grand-Mosque-Mecca.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
in action. A lot of them are just queers who get caught or admit to being queer. 
On the Grand Canyon Facebook page, they highlighted shell fossils found in the area, and of course scads of morons were claiming it was from Noah's flood 4,000 years ago. 
it is the Christian God, then it is him, his son and the Holy Ghost 
But you are right: logic never stopped the conspiracy nuts from flailing away.
Masjid al-Haram
The world is a mixture of strange occurrences and outright irony.
The nature of the Black Stone has been much debated. It has been described variously as basalt stone, an agate, a piece of natural glass or — most popularly — a stony meteorite. Paul Partsch, the curator of the Austro-Hungarian imperial collection of minerals, published the first comprehensive history of the Black Stone in 1857 in which he favoured a meteoritic origin for the Stone.[39] Robert Dietz and John McHone proposed in 1974 that the Black Stone was actually an agate, judging from its physical attributes and a report by an Arab geologist that the Stone contained clearly discernible diffusion banding characteristic of agates.[2]
A significant clue to its nature is provided by an account of the Stone's recovery in 951 AD after it had been stolen 21 years earlier; according to a chronicler, the Stone was identified by its ability to float in water. If this account is accurate, it would rule out the Black Stone being an agate, a basalt lava or a stony meteorite, though it would be compatible with it being glass or pumice.[5]
Elsebeth Thomsen of the University of Copenhagen proposed a different hypothesis in 1980. She suggested that the Black Stone may be a glass fragment or impactite from the impact of a fragmented meteorite that fell some 6,000 years ago at Wabar,[40] a site in the Rub' al Khali desert 1,100 km east of Mecca. The craters at Wabar are notable for the presence of blocks of silica glass, fused by the heat of the impact and impregnated with beads of a nickel-iron alloy from the meteorite (most of which was destroyed in the impact). Some of the glass blocks are made of shiny black glass, with a white or yellow interior and gas-filled hollows, which allow them to float on water.[5] Although scientists did not become aware of the Wabar craters until 1932, they were located near a caravan route from Oman and were very likely known to the inhabitants of the desert. The wider area was certainly well-known; in ancient Arabic poetry, Wabar or Ubar (also known as "Iram of the Pillars"
was the site of a fabulous city that was destroyed by fire from the heavens because of the wickedness of its king. If the estimated age of the crater is accurate, it would have been well within the period of human habitation in Arabia and the impact itself may have been witnessed.[5]A recent (2004) scientific analysis of the Wabar site suggests that the impact event happened much more recently than first thought and might have occurred only within the last 200–300 years.[41]
The meteoritic hypothesis is now viewed by geologists as doubtful. The British Natural History Museum suggests that it may be a pseudometeorite, in other words a terrestrial rock mistakenly attributed to a meteoritic origin.
Still no one seems to know for sure what it's composition is, shame.
(they all fought about who would get to stick it in the corner), so the story goes, and Muhamad set the stone.
There is a Persian image of Muhamad doing just this (from back when people weren't so squeamish about 'graven images' you see). That's himself at the center:
and if you think the Universe isn't made of discord and chaos, you're not paying attention.
I guess ol' God was trying to send a message! That's the only conclusion I can draw!
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/2-churches-burned-down-at-easter-begin-rebuilding-at-christmas-1.2884355
really ... it's kinda bizarre.
But, hey, have a good day. My day is fine, except that I have to work in between DU breaks.
It's also pretty odd that we resort to post hoc ergo prompter hoc arguments for lack of anything better.
I'd always figured that if that particular fallacy is the best position I can offer, I should stay quiet rather than appearing as an irrational and under-educated person.
Just sayin. 