General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe United States Probably Has More Foreign Military Bases Than Any Other People, Nation, or Empire
-- in History
http://www.thenation.com/article/the-united-states-probably-has-more-foreign-military-bases-than-any-other-people-nation-or-empire-in-history/
To the extent that Americans think about these bases at all, we generally assume theyre essential to national security and global peace. Our leaders have claimed as much since most of them were established during World War II and the early days of the Cold War. As a result, we consider the situation normal and accept that US military installations exist in staggering numbers in other countries, on other peoples land. On the other hand, the idea that there would be foreign bases on US soil is unthinkable.
While there are no freestanding foreign bases permanently located in the United States, there are now around 800 US bases in foreign countries. Seventy years after World War II and 62 years after the Korean War, there are still 174 US base sites in Germany, 113 in Japan, and 83 in South Korea, according to the Pentagon. Hundreds more dot the planet in around 80 countries, including Aruba and Australia, Bahrain and Bulgaria, Colombia, Kenya, and Qatar, among many other places. Although few Americans realize it, the United States likely has more bases in foreign lands than any other people, nation, or empire in history.
Oddly enough, however, the mainstream media rarely report or comment on the issue. For years, during debates over the closure of the prison at the base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, nary a pundit or politician wondered why the United States has a base on Cuban territory in the first place or questioned whether we should have one there at all. Rarely does anyone ask if we need hundreds of bases overseas or if, at an estimated annual cost of perhaps $156 billion or more, the United States can afford them. Rarely does anyone wonder how we would feel if China, Russia, or Iran built even a single base anywhere near our borders, let alone in the United States.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Of all of these military bases, I smell bull****
eridani
(51,907 posts)Googling "800 military bases" gives you 1.7 million results.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The US doesn't own al-Udeid Air Base. It is and always has been a Qatari installation, but has recently had major sections of it leased to ISAF and the MNF-Iraq.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)In the U.K., for example, almost every RAF base has at least a small U.S. presence, often just to coordinate maintence and fuel for transiet airplanes. They may consider those "bases."
But I agree with the general gist of the article that we have way too may troops deployed abroad.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Our shining city on a hill is based on a myth
ancianita
(36,014 posts)needs to get more traction in the public's consciousness.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)This is a clear case of the author either not being smart enough to comprehend what the report he cites actually says, or else it's intentional misrepresentation.
The report lists each piece of real estate leased or owned by the DOD. Those are not all "bases".
Some are small offices, 600-2000 square feet or so. That's no more a base than the recruiters office down in the strip mall is.
Many of them are small remote radio transmitting sites, a leased hangar at an airport for emergency use, a leased pier in a harbor, or similar minor sites.
The Armed Forces Recreation Areas, DOD run vacation spots for military families overseas, are also listed. Before it closed there was a Boy Scout camp in Germany for the kids of military members in Europe that was on the list- what an evil empire base that was.
On top of all that, many bases overseas are made up of many different parcels that are leased or owned differently or are not contiguous- so those all get listed on the report separately. Anyone who has spent any time stationed in Germany can look at the list and see how what is one real "base" can have 5-10-15 seperate entries for its various parcels. If the base was initially 2 small WWII German posts taken over after the war, then the land between was added, then over time they added 12 more small parcels, plus the family housing areas are in two different areas just off post, plus they leased a large parking area down by the railroad for railhead operations- that can be listed as 18 seperate entries in this list.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)The UK, Germany, Spain, Mexico, Canada, Honduras, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Poland, and several others all train some or all of their pilots here and have leased buildings and facilities at US bases, just like many of the ones listed above are. That's just off the top of my head there are more.
The Getmans at Holloman AFB are one of the most well known examples:
http://www.holloman.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=4364
Their buildings are leased there under an agreement much like many of the ones listed on that list are by the U.S. in Germany.
eridani
(51,907 posts)The 3000 bases claim includes a lot of those arrangements. The 800 claim does not. What percentage of the world's total military expenditures do we account for?
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)I'm just bringing facts and relevant background information to the discussion.
You asked for a list of what countries had bases here, evidently ignorant of the fact that they exist, and I simply provided examples for you- and you reply by putting words in my mouth in a strawman argument accusing me of denying something.
It's clear your not actually interested in a fact based discussion when presented with facts that don't fit the worldview in your little bubble, so I'm out.