Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
Wed Sep 16, 2015, 04:29 PM Sep 2015

Another casualty of school security concerns: school lockers.

Some people have wondered why Ahmed, the clock-building 14 year old, didn't have his clock safety tucked away in his locker.

Aside from the likelihood that its beeping would have drawn suspicion anyway, even in a locker, the fact is that many schools have eliminated school lockers in favor of making kids lug heavy backpacks through all their classes.

They think everyone's safer that way.



http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/lifestyle/2011/11/going-lockerless-why-more-and-more-schools-are-eliminating-lockers/

The locker can represent many things for high school students: a center of social interaction, a means of self-expression, that one little area of school that is wholly and entirely theirs. At its most basic, the locker is a storage unit, a place for students to keep books and other supplies so that they don’t have to lug heavy backpacks to school everyday. And yet in many schools the locker is quickly becoming a thing of the past.

There are many reasons for its elimination, according to Ronnie McGehee, interim superintendent of the Madison County School District in Mississippi, where many of the schools are going lockerless. The first benefit, says Dr. McGehee, is in student safety. Eliminating lockers alleviates concern “that students were putting things in there that they shouldn’t,” such as weapons or drugs.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another casualty of school security concerns: school lockers. (Original Post) pnwmom Sep 2015 OP
Just as I thought ... GeorgeGist Sep 2015 #1
Sadly Texas has some of the dumbest wastes of oxygen sitting on school boards Rex Sep 2015 #2
Of course they do. Because liberal arts might teach them to think. pnwmom Sep 2015 #3
It is worse when they have to lug their back packs everywhere. femmocrat Sep 2015 #4
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
2. Sadly Texas has some of the dumbest wastes of oxygen sitting on school boards
Wed Sep 16, 2015, 04:46 PM
Sep 2015

and on the state board of education. We have creationalists re-writting Texas history books as I type this. Administrators unqualified to run a vending machine and school leaders that get moved from one position to another after one failure after another failure after another.

Public schools have been destroyed by Reganomics and puritanical-authoritarianism by RWing morons scared of their own shadow! Many want to do away with the Liberal Arts completely!

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
4. It is worse when they have to lug their back packs everywhere.
Wed Sep 16, 2015, 07:20 PM
Sep 2015

There is no place to put them and they are a tripping hazard. Then you have kids who put things in or take things out of someone else's bag. Lockers with combination locks are best. Administrators can still get into them and the kids' stuff is secure. They could just as easily hide contraband in a book or gym bag.... duh!

Also... where would they put their coats in the winter? Stupid idea.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another casualty of schoo...