Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeb! Bush attacks Bernie Sanders' economic proposals ($18TRILLION$18TRILLION$18 TRILLION!!)
The UK Guardian reports:
An energised Jeb Bush has said Bernie Sanders is the front runner in the Democratic presidential race as he used a Republican rally to rail against the Vermont senators proposals.
Bush told the Mackinac Republican leadership conference Sanders is the leading Democrat in a nod to recent polls showing the senator has taken the lead from Hillary Clinton in the crucial early voting state of Iowa.
It was not all niceties, however. Bush proceeded to lambast the self-declared socialist Democrat.
Sanders has proposed $18 trillion of new spending over the next decade and its only September, in the year before the election, he said, drawing laughter from the room.
The former Florida governor then summoned the spirit of Dr Evil, the fictional villain in the Austin Powers films, saying if Dr Evil heard Bernie Sanders was talking about $18 trillion, hed have a heart attack.
Bush told the Mackinac Republican leadership conference Sanders is the leading Democrat in a nod to recent polls showing the senator has taken the lead from Hillary Clinton in the crucial early voting state of Iowa.
It was not all niceties, however. Bush proceeded to lambast the self-declared socialist Democrat.
Sanders has proposed $18 trillion of new spending over the next decade and its only September, in the year before the election, he said, drawing laughter from the room.
The former Florida governor then summoned the spirit of Dr Evil, the fictional villain in the Austin Powers films, saying if Dr Evil heard Bernie Sanders was talking about $18 trillion, hed have a heart attack.
[font size=3]SIGH......[/font]
Of course, the Wall Street Journal pushed this distortion in the first place.... yesterday.
Washington Post: No, Bernie Sanders is not going to bankrupt America to the tune of $18 trillion, September 15, 2015
.....Sanders does want to spend significant amounts of money, almost all of it is on things were already paying for; he just wants to change how we pay for them. In some ways its by spreading out a cost currently borne by a limited number of people to all taxpayers. His plan for free public college would do this: right now, its paid for by students and their families, while under Sanders plan wed all pay for it in the same way we all pay for parks or the military or food safety.
But the bulk of what Sanders wants to do is in the first category: to have us pay through taxes for things were already paying for in other ways. Depending on your perspective on government, you may think thats a bad idea. But we shouldnt treat his proposals as though theyre going to cost us $18 trillion on top of what were already paying.
And theres another problem with that scary $18 trillion figure, which is what the Journal says is the 10-year cost of Sanders ideas: fully $15 trillion of it comes not from an analysis of anything Sanders has proposed, but from the fact that Sanders has said hed like to see a single-payer health insurance system, and theres a single-payer plan in Congress that has been estimated to cost $15 trillion. Sanders hasnt actually released any health care plan, so we have no idea what his might cost.
But health care is nevertheless a good place to examine why these big numbers can be so misleading. At the moment, total health care spending in the United States runs over $3 trillion a year; according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over the next decade (from 2015-2024), America will spend a total of $42 trillion on health care. This is money that you and I and everyone else spends. We spend it in a variety of ways: through our health-insurance premiums, through the reduced salaries we get if our employers pick up part or all of the cost of those premiums, through our co-pays and deductibles, and through our taxes that fund Medicare, Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and the VA health care system. Were already paying about $10,000 a year per capita for health care.
So lets say that Bernie Sanders became president and passed a single-payer health care system of some sort. And lets say that it did indeed cost $15 trillion over 10 years. Would that be $15 trillion in new money wed be spending? No, it would be money that were already spending on health care, but now it would go through government. If I told you I could cut your health insurance premiums by $1,000 and increase your taxes by $1,000, you wouldnt have lost $1,000. Youd be in the same place you are now.
.....
But the bulk of what Sanders wants to do is in the first category: to have us pay through taxes for things were already paying for in other ways. Depending on your perspective on government, you may think thats a bad idea. But we shouldnt treat his proposals as though theyre going to cost us $18 trillion on top of what were already paying.
And theres another problem with that scary $18 trillion figure, which is what the Journal says is the 10-year cost of Sanders ideas: fully $15 trillion of it comes not from an analysis of anything Sanders has proposed, but from the fact that Sanders has said hed like to see a single-payer health insurance system, and theres a single-payer plan in Congress that has been estimated to cost $15 trillion. Sanders hasnt actually released any health care plan, so we have no idea what his might cost.
But health care is nevertheless a good place to examine why these big numbers can be so misleading. At the moment, total health care spending in the United States runs over $3 trillion a year; according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over the next decade (from 2015-2024), America will spend a total of $42 trillion on health care. This is money that you and I and everyone else spends. We spend it in a variety of ways: through our health-insurance premiums, through the reduced salaries we get if our employers pick up part or all of the cost of those premiums, through our co-pays and deductibles, and through our taxes that fund Medicare, Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and the VA health care system. Were already paying about $10,000 a year per capita for health care.
So lets say that Bernie Sanders became president and passed a single-payer health care system of some sort. And lets say that it did indeed cost $15 trillion over 10 years. Would that be $15 trillion in new money wed be spending? No, it would be money that were already spending on health care, but now it would go through government. If I told you I could cut your health insurance premiums by $1,000 and increase your taxes by $1,000, you wouldnt have lost $1,000. Youd be in the same place you are now.
.....
Many more details in the above piece.
But, to Jeb Bush and his pals at the Establishment Journal, it's more important to peddle lies.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 569 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb! Bush attacks Bernie Sanders' economic proposals ($18TRILLION$18TRILLION$18 TRILLION!!) (Original Post)
seafan
Sep 2015
OP
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)1. Hillary supporters arm in arm with the WSJ and Jeb Bush
So surprising!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)2. One response in is two posts that should be in GD-P. nt