Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 05:24 PM Sep 2015

Researchers said a popular antidepressant was safe for teens. It was actually deadly.

For years, the drug company GlaxoSmithKline was illegally persuading doctors to prescribe paroxetine, sold under the brand name Paxil, as an antidepressant for children and teenagers. They did so by citing what's known as Study 329 — research that was funded by the drug company and published in 2001, claiming to show that Paxil is "well tolerated and effective" for kids.

That marketing effort worked. In 2002 alone, doctors wrote two million Paxil prescriptions for children and adolescents.

But now here's the horrifying news: A major new analysis of the raw data behind Study 329, published in BMJ, suggests that the original conclusions were wildly wrong. Not only is Paxil ineffective, working no better than placebo, but it can actually cause serious side effects, including self-injury and suicide.

Unlike the original study, this follow-up research isn't funded by the drug manufacturer. And the researchers found that GSK had manipulated their data and selectively downplayed the harms of the drug in their analysis.

<snip>

http://www.vox.com/2015/9/19/9355121/paxil-research-fraud

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Researchers said a popular antidepressant was safe for teens. It was actually deadly. (Original Post) villager Sep 2015 OP
60 years ago M.D.s told patients to smoke olddots Sep 2015 #1
Really? WinkyDink Sep 2015 #24
Yes that's true arikara Sep 2015 #48
How many kids must a company have to kill for its management to be prosecuted and put in jail? cpompilo Sep 2015 #2
k/r Johnson & Johnson "created a powerful drug, promoted it illegally, covered up side effects" nationalize the fed Sep 2015 #3
A lot mercuryblues Sep 2015 #6
When science depends on getting paid... Octafish Sep 2015 #4
That simple malaise Sep 2015 #5
I've always been fascinated how supposedly intelligent people have that simple concept Rex Sep 2015 #8
I doubt it goes over the head of otherwise intelligent people. I think something else pnwmom Sep 2015 #12
On this we agree 100%. Rex Sep 2015 #13
+1000. n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #16
Corruption is a certainty. sulphurdunn Sep 2015 #20
well said. LeftOfWest Sep 2015 #43
I see this happening with vaccines arikara Sep 2015 #49
this just shows we need MORE blind faith! MORE! ~~Dr DWS MisterP Sep 2015 #7
Once again, self-injury and suicide are the EFFECTS .. ananda Sep 2015 #9
The Science* was Settled*. Shandris Sep 2015 #10
One obviously flawed study versus hundreds and hundreds of solid studies. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #26
Whatever helps your cognitive dissonance. nt laundry_queen Sep 2015 #30
No cognitive dissonance. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #32
Are you forgetting the third test Paxil went through? ryan_cats Sep 2015 #36
Lots and lots of cognitive dissonance. villager Sep 2015 #37
Now you're just not even bothering to read my posts, lovely. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #38
Actually, you never said that as explicitly as you stated it just now villager Sep 2015 #40
BS. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #52
... NuclearDem Sep 2015 #54
Trying to argue with pro-gmo is like trying to argue with pro-paxil. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #55
Trying to argue with woo-woos is like trying to argue with bananas. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #56
Science is woo-woo. Corporate "scientific research" is untrue. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #57
I'm actually legitimately dumbfounded by this statement. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #58
... Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #59
Just further proof of America's declining standards of science education. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #60
Yes, especially when some are so quick to believe the oligarchs lies. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #61
Or their lack of conscience. LeftOfWest Sep 2015 #44
How many of the hundreds and hundreds of studies truebluegreen Sep 2015 #31
This information has been presented many countless times here. NuclearDem Sep 2015 #33
Really? truebluegreen Sep 2015 #34
There's a slight difference in the scientific community's capabilities NuclearDem Sep 2015 #35
True. I'd also say there's a difference truebluegreen Sep 2015 #46
And the science on GMOs has been settled and ANY GMO EVER produced will be safe. n/t pnwmom Sep 2015 #11
That stuff is poison MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #14
I agree. killbotfactory Sep 2015 #15
It was crazier than hallucinogenics MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #17
I thought getting off Paxil was bad until I started trying to get off of Nexium. LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #18
Ow. That sucks too! MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #19
I used to run to my md and get a ECG, she would loot at it and toss me a bottle of Nexium. My LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #22
Try meditation. Stevepol Sep 2015 #28
And lots of other "woo" therapies work well such as emdr, eft, chanting, art therapy, etc.... Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #53
Not just kids. SusanCalvin Sep 2015 #21
Can we correct the headline? gcomeau Sep 2015 #23
is it any wonder that many don't believe the "science" from climate change to vaccines? nt bbgrunt Sep 2015 #25
I'm shocked, shocked I say! Warren DeMontague Sep 2015 #27
Who could have guessed truebluegreen Sep 2015 #29
I was on Paxil for quite a long time davidpdx Sep 2015 #39
Why, cheap medication is for suckers! Certainly not for corporations! villager Sep 2015 #41
Your post had nothing to do with my reply davidpdx Sep 2015 #42
Um, I wasn't snarking, but agreeing with your observation about the expense villager Sep 2015 #45
Sorry about that davidpdx Sep 2015 #62
Ah, this has happened to me once or twice villager Sep 2015 #63
This is good to know. LWolf Sep 2015 #47
LBN: 'Mischief' in old study claiming drug is safe. bananas Sep 2015 #50
"Mischief," eh? villager Sep 2015 #65
And can cause seizures. Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #51
I remember that...I was prescribed it in grad school... Blue_Tires Sep 2015 #64

arikara

(5,562 posts)
48. Yes that's true
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 01:57 PM
Sep 2015

The father of my best school chum, who was a heavy smoker had an early heart attack. He quit smoking and of course had problems with his nerves so the doctor told him to start smoking again. He lived for another 20 or so years and never quit.

This would have been back in the mid 60's.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
3. k/r Johnson & Johnson "created a powerful drug, promoted it illegally, covered up side effects"
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:02 PM
Sep 2015

America's Most Admired Lawbreaker: Johnson & Johnson

Huffington Post: Over the course of 20 years, Johnson & Johnson created a powerful drug, promoted it illegally to children and the elderly, covered up the side effects and made billions of dollars. This is the inside story

A 15 Chapter expose by Steven Brill

http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/americas-most-admired-lawbreaker/

How much of this stuff is going on that we haven't heard about?



mercuryblues

(14,526 posts)
6. A lot
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:33 PM
Sep 2015

It is not always suicide. A SC teen shot his grandparents, while they slept at the age of 12. He was on Paxil, But it was not available in his G-parents area. So a DR substituted it with Zoloft. Despite complaining of terrible side effects the DR doubled his dose and received some pain medication. Two days later, he shot and killed his grandparents. He was tried as an adult. The defense was the sudden withdrawal from paxil to Zoloft created a manic state. The prosecution and jury did not believe it and found him guilty.

I hope the fuckers read this story

http://murderpedia.org/male.P/p/pittmanchristopher.htm

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. When science depends on getting paid...
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:07 PM
Sep 2015

...there will be conflicts of interest. Add in billions in sales and profits at stake, corruption is almost a certainty.

malaise

(268,850 posts)
5. That simple
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:14 PM
Sep 2015

As Castro said this evening - the market says there are no citizens just consumers so buy and die...'cause the money keeps rolling in.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
8. I've always been fascinated how supposedly intelligent people have that simple concept
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:39 PM
Sep 2015

go right over their head. Of course the reality is more than likely they let it, because they have a pro-corporate agenda and don't care about the victims.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
12. I doubt it goes over the head of otherwise intelligent people. I think something else
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:07 PM
Sep 2015

is going into their pockets.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. On this we agree 100%.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:09 PM
Sep 2015

I am always wary of altruistic people that come out of nowhere with all the answers until you start asking questions. Then they ignore you and hide behind data and a lawyer.

arikara

(5,562 posts)
49. I see this happening with vaccines
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 02:20 PM
Sep 2015

hopefully there won't be too much permanent damage done before it happens.

Maybe some of the old ones are worthwhile, but I don't trust them anymore with all the fake hype and knowing people who get sick as soon as they get a flu shot. And kids who get measles as soon as they have a vaccine, then spread it around. I even know one mother who took her measled kid on an airplane across the country and justified it by saying "its ok, he had his vaccination so its just a mild case." Somebody like this spreads it around and they turn around and blame unvaccinated kids.

Its nothing more than a money maker for the drug companies, aided and abetted by their stooges in the governments.

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
10. The Science* was Settled*.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:49 PM
Sep 2015

*Patent pending, trademark pending, all rights reserved, anti-GMO is ANTI-SCIENCE trust us!

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
26. One obviously flawed study versus hundreds and hundreds of solid studies.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:14 PM
Sep 2015

Minor difference between this case and GM foods.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
32. No cognitive dissonance.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:18 PM
Sep 2015

GM foods have been tested for decades and gone through many hundreds of studies.

This drug went through two: the one J&J used, and the one that determined it harmful for adolescents. It should have gone through more.

There's no comparison between the two.

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
36. Are you forgetting the third test Paxil went through?
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:08 AM
Sep 2015

Are you forgetting the third test Paxil went through?

GlaxoSmithKline undertook a rigorous, highly controlled test where the only people on it went through the arduous process of getting a Doctor to prescribe it with the last high hurdle to use was getting it filled at a pharmacy. What more could they possibly do?

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
37. Lots and lots of cognitive dissonance.
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:20 AM
Sep 2015

Would love to see you in a room with parents of one of the teen suicide victims, explaining how "wrong" they are.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
38. Now you're just not even bothering to read my posts, lovely.
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:23 AM
Sep 2015

Paxil should never have been prescribed for adolescents. In fact, no drug intended for adults should be prescribed for children without very vigorous safety tests.

If you had bothered to read the post you were responding to, you would have noticed that I specifically said the drug should have gone through far more tests than it had.

Want to try again? Or are you just going to suggest I like kicking puppies now?

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
40. Actually, you never said that as explicitly as you stated it just now
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:29 AM
Sep 2015

But always glad to see you on the side of light, occasionally



As for puppy-kicking, as long as no corporation dispatches studies insisting that it's an entirely harmless procedure, and animal rights are just progress-shitting "woo" sentiments, we appear to be on the same side of that issue.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
31. How many of the hundreds and hundreds of studies
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:13 PM
Sep 2015

on drugs, pesticides, GMOs (or whatever) study long-term effects? How about combinations of things?

Trust away; I won't. Not when the profit motive is involved and no long-term data exists (which btw still allows me to "believe" that vaccines work and climate change is real).

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
33. This information has been presented many countless times here.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:26 PM
Sep 2015

And every time it gets brought up, the person requesting it simply moves the goalposts and declares that GMOs "haven't been tested enough."

If the point being made has been ignored one billion times with the exact same evidence, bothering to make it a billion and one times won't change any minds.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
34. Really?
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:39 PM
Sep 2015

Please provide links to tests showing the effects of eating GMOs for 30 years. Oh, that's funny: they don't exist and won't exist for decades, will they?

How many years did people smoke before the effects were known? How about pesticides, let's say DDT--how long was that in use before wider impacts were known, and who discovered them? The company that produced it? The government that approved it? At least the government in those days was not wholly corrupt and something could be done; we are in a much worse position now.

You want to insist the jury is in and the science is settled: fine for you. I'll pass.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
35. There's a slight difference in the scientific community's capabilities
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:49 PM
Sep 2015

in the early 20th century and those of the present day.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
46. True. I'd also say there's a difference
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:02 PM
Sep 2015

in the nature of the scientific community between then and now: how much is industry-funded and/or driven? You're arguing that the story referenced in the OP involved one skewed test out of hundreds of solid ones, and yet there is a big story just this week about another company--Johnson & Johnson--falsifying test results for profit. Another anomaly or the tip of the iceberg?

I'll most likely be dead in 30 years, but it won't be because I ate GMOs.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
14. That stuff is poison
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:12 PM
Sep 2015

Years ago, I had trouble sleeping more than a few hours. My GP prescribed Paxil for anxiety. It didn't help, but had some bad side effects, so I stopped it. Withdrawal was incredible - I had bizarre neurological sensations (not uncommon, apparently) and bad gastrointestinal distress. I ended up tapering down over weeks, and it sucked.

Immediately switched to a new GP!

BTW, BMJ is an excellent medical journal, my favorite.

LiberalArkie

(15,708 posts)
18. I thought getting off Paxil was bad until I started trying to get off of Nexium.
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:22 PM
Sep 2015

After 15 years of Nexium it was bad. But it only took 5 months and I still have a problem telling heartburn from angina. Oh well.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
19. Ow. That sucks too!
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:26 PM
Sep 2015

Hard to tell them apart; in fact, the Chief of a cardiology group I used to work with was sure he had heartburn for days when it was actually an MI.

LiberalArkie

(15,708 posts)
22. I used to run to my md and get a ECG, she would loot at it and toss me a bottle of Nexium. My
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 07:38 PM
Sep 2015

cardiologist told me to first take a Zantac and if it doesn't go away, can an ambulance. Hell of a way to run a railroad. I am due for a heart cath in a month or so, he wants to check and make sure all the plumbing is good. He thinks I have a little blockage on the backside that the nuclear stress test indicated. I never felt any pain from it though. I was born with piss poor genetics and I know it as a kid before anyone knew what genetics was. Bad stomach, bad eyes from birth, mitral valve problems, asthma, and bad ears and piss poor balance. If someone offers to extend my life (I am 67) I will probably shoot them. ;>

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
23. Can we correct the headline?
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 08:04 PM
Sep 2015

To "Paid shills said..." perhaps, in the interests of accuracy? As written it carries the implication people were actually seriously trying to research the effects rather than trying to manufacture an outcome for their employer. Those people were not "researchers".

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
29. Who could have guessed
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 11:06 PM
Sep 2015

that research funded and/or conducted by industry yields the results that industry desires?

Remember that the next time you hear the GMOs are safe.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
39. I was on Paxil for quite a long time
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:28 AM
Sep 2015

After awhile I felt like it lost its effectiveness and I switched to another medication. It wasn't cheap either.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
41. Why, cheap medication is for suckers! Certainly not for corporations!
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 12:30 AM
Sep 2015

Next you're gonna tell me you're voting for a socialist!

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
45. Um, I wasn't snarking, but agreeing with your observation about the expense
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 11:26 AM
Sep 2015

Sorry you mis-read and felt obliged to reply thusly.

Nonetheless, the hazards of a discussion board.

Onward, be well, etc..

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
63. Ah, this has happened to me once or twice
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 04:38 PM
Sep 2015

Part of the problem is this "discussion" board is a complete minefield of snark right now, so it's still kind of a shock to click on "replies" to find people agreeing with you, not in attack mode, etc...

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
47. This is good to know.
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 01:05 PM
Sep 2015

I was prescribed Paxil for a very short time (2 months) after my last divorce, which was pretty devastating. I was a 41 yo adult, though.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
50. LBN: 'Mischief' in old study claiming drug is safe.
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 07:19 PM
Sep 2015

"New analysis shows suicide link for teens on Paxil. 'Mischief' in old study claiming drug is safe."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141209302

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Researchers said a popula...