General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis Pope has a Sense of Humor
Defend life at every stage - abolish the death penalty
Meanwhile ReTHUGs cheered and cheered thinking he was talking about abortion. Oops!
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)The right to abortion is in danger. Fuck him.
LostOne4Ever
(9,287 posts)He was speaking about the death penalty
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)malaise
(268,844 posts)I am an atheist. That said I found it hilarious that ReTHUGs[/s] cheered without knowing what was coming.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)no sky guy for me. I appreciate what you're trying to say but it went so far over some heads its funny. Funny in a sad way actually
Life is so much simpler if one stays as far away from the myth of a supreme being, anyones flavor or everyones flavor
BTW whose sky guy is the right one? I figured this one out when I was about 14 YO.
I loves me some non believer life. When it comes right down to it its religion that wars are fought over, many people are living in strife due to one or the other not accepting the other. Fuck that noise. John Lennon got it right.
Mom used to translate stuff for them so she would get calls from the bishop. I was 12 when I told my very Catholic mother that I wasn't calling any bishop My Lord and wasn't kissing any ring or bowing to any of them. I told her I didn't believe anything linked to gawds. As I grew older she realized that I was not faking my 'worldiness' as many call it in these parts.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He was in Congress speaking against reproductive choice. In the US poor women in many states have a great deal of trouble accessing proper services.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)The things he says have an impact on the reproductive choices of millions. And right here, right now in this country, those choices are being viciously attacked. His opinions and his church are responsible for and/or contribute immensely to that.
Still not funny.
Yuck it up about the Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurn on the GOP, but please don't expect I or other will. It's horrific.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Anti-choice, anti-euthanasia and anti-death penalty position.
malaise
(268,844 posts)The thing is you missed what I found funny - whatever.
ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)That is a well reasoned analysis and is no more welcomed than a divisive figure like the pope is. Unless the pope is saying something I agree with this moment, then roll out the red carpet.
Maven
(10,533 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)not Francis.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Fuck the pope. I find all this mooning over Pope Frankie McDreamy very distasteful. It's as though just not being a former Nazi is enough to be a hero.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)women's rights away.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Almost as funny as regarding head gear as a giant penis. One can only wonder at the fantastical and peculiar mental decoding an Ushanka would engender from someone entertaining that particular state of mind.
Dr Freud, clean-up on aisle seven!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . but he found a way to talk about both that brilliantly pointed up the hypocrisy of those on the right who are quick to cite the Church's teaching concerning the sacredness of human life when it comes to one particular issue, while clearly ignoring it with regard to many others.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)All of it is bullshit
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . that those on the religious right who think that have a pretty tough time making that case.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Are you opposed to reproductive choice as well?
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)I strongly support a woman's right to choose. While I am not entirely morally comfortable with abortion, for a variety of reasons -- not least of which is this country's historical experience during the time when abortion was illegal -- I have to come down on the side of a woman's right to choose. So I can respect the Church's position -- provided it is embraced and applied consistently -- even as I strongly disagree with it, What the Pope did here, however, was to point out just how inconsistent most abortion opponents in this country really are. I applaud that.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)level of anesthesia. And the level of discomfort, medically speaking, may well be quite limited. I dont know, as a man I have never had one.
A man is not capable of having any physical discomfort during an abortion, and if he has discomfort otherwise, then I suggest he check into that.
Given he has no business making any kind of judgment on something he never has to experience or deal with.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . I thought my post made that clear.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)My original reads:
"While I am not entirely morally comfortable with abortion, for a variety of reasons -- not least of which is this country's historical experience during the time when abortion was illegal -- I have to come down on the side of a woman's right to choose. "
I didn't say there were a variety of reasons that I am morally uncomfortable with abortion. I said I am morally uncomfortable with abortion, (but) for a variety of reasons I come down on the side of a woman's right to choose.
So was your omission of that comma after the word abortion, as well as of the concluding phrase of the sentence which clarified any ambiguity as to my stance regarding a woman's right to choose, a deliberate attempt to mischaracterize what I said? If it wasn't, it sure looks like it was.
BTW, those double dashes indicate an interruption of a phrase, therefore, "for a variety of reasons" clearly belongs with what follows the interruption, namely, the phrase "I have to come down on the side of a woman's right to choose."
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)what moral reasons do you have discomfort with abortion?
you still havent explained that, have you?
i guess it doesnt really matter
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . I don't go around trying to impose my moral views on others, and I sure as hell don't owe you any explanation of those views. I nevertheless strongly support a woman's right to choose, so why would you even care?
And you DID omit that comma, whether intentionally or not. That comma is critical to the meaning of the sentence. If you cannot understand how it affects the meaning of the sentence, then you don't have a very good grasp of English punctuation.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)the comma was NOT omitted on purpose, I copy pasted the first part then realized I didnt get it all and did it a second time and the comma got missed
It makes no difference because I was asking a question you dont want to answer, and you are right, you dont have to answer it
I made my point
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . you want to pick apart my personal moral reservations about abortion (reservations that apply in some, but not all, cases). Frankly, my reservations are none of anybody's business so long as I am not using those reservations as a basis for denying a woman's right to choose. And I am not using them for such a basis. But I don't owe an explanation of matters of private conscience to you or anyone else. I support a woman's right to choose, full stop. If that isn't enough for you, too bad.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)about the inappropriateness of any man having any position on abortion, at all
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . there's nothing inherently wrong with holding a position or opinion about something, even if it is something that does not directly affect that person. It's how that position is given expression politically that counts. I recognize my own lack of standing relative to the issue, and that is another of the reasons I defer to a woman's right to choose.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)have no business having a position on, or a judgmental position, because I think this is the way to get people to learn and change their minds.
It is how my mind was changed on some stuff over the years.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)Now I am not a woman, but if a woman said that, it would sound kind of stupid, wouldnt it.
What god damn business is it of hers?
Get my point?
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . personally, I think it is stupid to work so hard to alienate someone who is an ally on the underlying question merely because he or she comes at the question a bit differently from the way you do.
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)markpkessinger
(8,392 posts). . . I appreciate that.
malaise
(268,844 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)The way the wild cheers died when he started talking about the death penalty was pretty funny.
malaise
(268,844 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)Be careful out there, Francis is evil dontcha know.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)spanone
(135,802 posts)i thought it was brilliant and i think he knew exactly what he was doing.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Wonder how many were thinking "oh shi-" halfway through the applause.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)got home and I'm exhausted, so - what do you mean? (I think my brain went to sleep without me. Lulz.)
rug
(82,333 posts)malaise
(268,844 posts)Love the Lucy analogy - perfect.