General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPaul Krugman-The Blackmail Caucus, a.k.a. the Republican Party
John Boehner was a terrible, very bad, no good speaker of the House. Under his leadership, Republicans pursued an unprecedented strategy of scorched-earth obstructionism, which did immense damage to the economy and undermined Americas credibility around the world.
Still, things could have been worse. And under his successor they almost surely will be worse. Bad as Mr. Boehner was, he was just a symptom of the underlying malady, the madness that has consumed his party.
For me, Mr. Boehners defining moment remains what he said and did as House minority leader in early 2009, when a newly inaugurated President Obama was trying to cope with the disastrous recession that began under his predecessor.
There was and is a strong consensus among economists that a temporary period of deficit spending can help mitigate an economic slump. In 2008 a stimulus plan passed Congress with bipartisan support, and the case for a further stimulus in 2009 was overwhelming. But with a Democrat in the White House, Mr. Boehner demanded that policy go in the opposite direction, declaring that American families are tightening their belts. But they dont see government tightening its belt. And he called for government to go on a diet.
This was know-nothing economics, and incredibly irresponsible at a time of crisis; not long ago it would have been hard to imagine a major political figure making such a statement. Did Mr. Boehner actually believe what he was saying? Was he just against anything Mr. Obama was for? Or was he engaged in deliberate sabotage, trying to block measures that would help the economy because a bad economy would be good for Republican electoral prospects?
Well probably never know for sure, but those remarks set the tone for everything that followed. The Boehner era has been one in which Republicans have accepted no responsibility for helping to govern the country, in which they have opposed anything and everything the president proposes.
more
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/28/opinion/paul-krugman-the-blackmail-caucus-aka-the-republican-party.html
pampango
(24,692 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)After summarizing Boehner's public statements, Krugman writes, "This was know-nothing economics, and incredibly irresponsible at a time of crisis; not long ago it would have been hard to imagine a major political figure making such a statement."
I disagree. I've been hearing major political figures (mostly Republicans but, alas, some Democrats) make such statements as long as I've been following politics. If I cared to do the research, I think I could find examples from Barry Goldwater on.
What's changed, IMO, is that Republicans used to content themselves with paying lip service to various economic follies. Having established their low-taxes-limited-government bona fides, they would then go on to cut some sort of deal. Now the dealmaking is much harder.
rladdi
(581 posts)Republicans. They have made it tough for him to be a good leader. The Republicans prefer to destroy our nation rather than to support Obama. The voters understand that now. The Republicans are the real threat to our nation and people. If they win in 2016, this nation will be destroyed. We will then know who the real ISIS is.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Why didn't we listen when the Republicans tried to save us by telling us that Obama was a secret Muslin, a non-American and socialist? The Republicans could have saved us. But, noooo, we wouldn't listen.
Why wasn't Obama a one term president, you know, since he is a socialist?