Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
Sat Oct 3, 2015, 10:43 AM Oct 2015

How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/nra-guns-second-amendment-106856

"A fraud on the American public.” That’s how former Chief Justice Warren Burger described the idea that the Second Amendment gives an unfettered individual right to a gun. When he spoke these words to PBS in 1990, the rock-ribbed conservative appointed by Richard Nixon was expressing the longtime consensus of historians and judges across the political spectrum.

Twenty-five years later, Burger’s view seems as quaint as a powdered wig. Not only is an individual right to a firearm widely accepted, but increasingly states are also passing laws to legalize carrying weapons on streets, in parks, in bars—even in churches.

Many are startled to learn that the U.S. Supreme Court didn’t rule that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to own a gun until 2008, when District of Columbia v. Heller struck down the capital’s law effectively banning handguns in the home. In fact, every other time the court had ruled previously, it had ruled otherwise. Why such a head-snapping turnaround? Don’t look for answers in dusty law books or the arcane reaches of theory.

So how does legal change happen in America? We’ve seen some remarkably successful drives in recent years—think of the push for marriage equality, or to undo campaign finance laws. Law students might be taught that the court is moved by powerhouse legal arguments or subtle shifts in doctrine. The National Rifle Association’s long crusade to bring its interpretation of the Constitution into the mainstream teaches a different lesson: Constitutional change is the product of public argument and political maneuvering. The pro-gun movement may have started with scholarship, but then it targeted public opinion and shifted the organs of government. By the time the issue reached the Supreme Court, the desired new doctrine fell like a ripe apple from a tree.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the NRA Rewrote the Second Amendment (Original Post) itsrobert Oct 2015 OP
Prior to Heller TeddyR Oct 2015 #1
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
1. Prior to Heller
Sat Oct 3, 2015, 12:07 PM
Oct 2015

The Supreme Court had not ruled on whether the Second Amendment protected an individual right to keep and bear arms. Many early decisions indicated that the 2d Amendment protects an individual right, as did the writings of many contemporaries of the founding fathers. Setting aside the 2d, many state constitutions explicitly protect an individual right to keep and bear arms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the NRA Rewrote the S...