Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
While that "good" guy with a gun is assessing whether or not he needs to kill you - Let this sink in (Original Post) kpete Oct 2015 OP
How to stop a killer: Step 1: Fantasize about killing people. DetlefK Oct 2015 #1
Bingo TlalocW Oct 2015 #2
If you decide to have a firearm for self-defense... Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #3
No one reacts in measures of split seconds and still maintain reliability. randome Oct 2015 #4
Active military and combat vets do. Rex Oct 2015 #9
Even then, unless you look for potential threats 24/7, you aren't going to do anyone any good. randome Oct 2015 #10
we could give them one bullet like Barney Fife. uncle ray Oct 2015 #11
Yep forsaken mortal Oct 2015 #5
May I ask why you felt little Tiffany deserved to die? hunter Oct 2015 #6
this is like a camp-guard training manual MisterP Oct 2015 #7
Yep. Any sane person wonders how things got that bad... hunter Oct 2015 #12
Wasn't the a conceiled carry on the Oregon campus and he Jim Beard Oct 2015 #8

TlalocW

(15,378 posts)
2. Bingo
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 10:50 AM
Oct 2015

A large group of gunowners who are claiming they need guns for self-defense are not thinking, "I hope it doesn't come down to it, but if I have to, I will use deadly force to defend myself and my family." Instead, they're buying a gun with the hope that they do get the chance to use it on another human.

TlalocW

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
3. If you decide to have a firearm for self-defense...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 11:27 AM
Oct 2015

...I'd argue that it's irresponsible not to give that matter some serious, sober thought. Moreover, that consideration should be made before buying the weapon.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
4. No one reacts in measures of split seconds and still maintain reliability.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 11:29 AM
Oct 2015

If everyone were armed, we would have a hell of a lot more accidental shootings, not fewer.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)
[/center][/font][hr]

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
9. Active military and combat vets do.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:07 PM
Oct 2015

Maybe only active and prior military should be allowed to handle firearms in public.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. Even then, unless you look for potential threats 24/7, you aren't going to do anyone any good.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:18 PM
Oct 2015

Unless by accident.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)
[/center][/font][hr]

forsaken mortal

(112 posts)
5. Yep
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 11:45 AM
Oct 2015

Gotta watch out for those crazy pregnant ladies. Have to be a big man and be ready to defend the ice-cream with a few rounds of hollowpoints before they eat it all.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
7. this is like a camp-guard training manual
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

except even camp guards hesitate, and they're turning Murka into a Rura Penthe-esque camp without walls, just people who've arrogated the role of guards and are given carte blanche by the statehouses

here's the hotlink to how they REALLY think http://www.guns.com/2011/07/19/could-you-shoot-your-own-son-in-self-defense/

everyone grab a copy before they firewall it!

hunter

(38,309 posts)
12. Yep. Any sane person wonders how things got that bad...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:42 PM
Oct 2015

... and nope, I'd rather be cut up and maybe die then shoot one of my own kids.

I've been in rough situations, but never once would me, hunter-with-a-gun have improved the outcome. I don't have any fantasies like that. Even when other people have had guns. Even when people were bleeding. I like to think in a war setting I'd be like my father-in-law. He was a Marine medic. His job was to patch people up, not shoot them. That's how they made him a medic. He said "no thanks" to guns.

My mom's dad went beyond that and was a Conscientious Objector during World War II. The U.S. government gave him a choice, prison or use his welding skills to build Liberty and Victory Ships. He built ships. (My mom's family tradition is draft dodging war hating pacifist. That's how they ended up in the U.S.A. "Wild West." The immigrants among them were dodging wars and religious persecution in Europe, and later the U.S. Civil War.)

I can be cold and extremely focused "just the facts" when I need to be. My wife and my sister are even better at that, as frequent and highly trained and licensed medical first responders, but I'm the sort who throws up in the bushes or nearest sink or trash can as soon as the immediate crisis is past, and then I have nightmares for years.

No thanks. I like to avoid trouble.

Gun fetishists are either clueless and inexperienced in such things, or psychopaths.

I've known and know quite a few combat veterans who have actually shot and killed people. They don't talk about their guns, mostly because they are happy to be home in a place where they don't need guns to feel safe. I've worked twice for bosses who lived through insane shit in Vietnam, and I'm friends with another. They don't talk about it. World War II vets tend to be the same.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
8. Wasn't the a conceiled carry on the Oregon campus and he
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 02:01 PM
Oct 2015

decided not to go after the shooter because the cops might think he was the good guy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»While that "good&quo...