Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolice withhold videos despite vows of transparency
Autumn Steele and her husband, Gabriel, were fighting again, so he called 911. A police officer sped to their home, pulled out his gun and then frightened by the family dog opened fire, killing Autumn with a bullet to her chest.
Since the Jan. 6 shooting, Steeles family has battled police in Burlington, Iowa, to see 28 minutes of body camera video recorded by the two officers who responded that day. Police have declared the videos confidential, saying the shooting was tragic but reasonable, given that the dog attacked. State investigators have released a 12-second clip from the videos, but Steeles relatives say it raises more questions than it answers.
I deserve to know what happened to my daughter. The public deserves to know, said Steeles mother, Gail Colbert. How can they keep this from us?
*Nationwide, police have shot and killed 760 people since January, according to a Washington Post database tracking every fatal shooting. Of those, The Post has found 49 incidents captured by body camera, or about 6 percent.
Just 21 of those videos less than half have been publicly released. And in several of those cases, the footage, as in Burlington, was severely cut or otherwise edited.
*What point is there of even doing this if they are going to be treated this way? Why even spend the money on these cameras? said Burlington Mayor Shane McCampbell, who has called on police to release video of the Steele shooting. He noted that police promised greater openness last year when they petitioned the city to buy body cameras.
If the videos are going to be a secret, no one is being held accountable, McCampbell said. And that was the point.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/10/08/police-withhold-videos-despite-vows-of-transparency/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 672 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency (Original Post)
damnedifIknow
Oct 2015
OP
xenoturkey
(68 posts)1. A gross indifference to justice
Grrr
ALL LEO's should wear body cams at ALL times uploaded to a third party server accessible to the public that can't be deleted.
What a travesty of justice. Makes me sick.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)2. It's a great idea. This makes me sick too. The mere fact that the guy peed his pants and drew on
the family dog makes him unqualified to carry a loaded gun, the goddamned coward.