Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 06:53 AM Oct 2015

Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency


Autumn Steele and her husband, Gabriel, were fighting again, so he called 911. A police officer sped to their home, pulled out his gun and then — frightened by the family dog — opened fire, killing Autumn with a bullet to her chest.

Since the Jan. 6 shooting, Steele’s family has battled police in Burlington, Iowa, to see 28 minutes of body camera video recorded by the two officers who responded that day. Police have declared the videos confidential, saying the shooting was tragic but reasonable, given that the dog “attacked.” State investigators have released a 12-second clip from the videos, but Steele’s relatives say it raises more questions than it answers.

“I deserve to know what happened to my daughter. The public deserves to know,” said Steele’s mother, Gail Colbert. “How can they keep this from us?”

*Nationwide, police have shot and killed 760 people since January, according to a Washington Post database tracking every fatal shooting. Of those, The Post has found 49 incidents captured by body camera, or about 6 percent.

Just 21 of those videos — less than half — have been publicly released. And in several of those cases, the footage, as in Burlington, was severely cut or otherwise edited.

*What point is there of even doing this if they are going to be treated this way? Why even spend the money on these cameras?” said Burlington Mayor Shane McCampbell, who has called on police to release video of the Steele shooting. He noted that police promised greater openness last year when they petitioned the city to buy body cameras.

If the videos “are going to be a secret, no one is being held accountable,” McCampbell said. “And that was the point.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/10/08/police-withhold-videos-despite-vows-of-transparency/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency (Original Post) damnedifIknow Oct 2015 OP
A gross indifference to justice xenoturkey Oct 2015 #1
It's a great idea. This makes me sick too. The mere fact that the guy peed his pants and drew on GoneFishin Oct 2015 #2

xenoturkey

(68 posts)
1. A gross indifference to justice
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 07:01 AM
Oct 2015

Grrr

ALL LEO's should wear body cams at ALL times uploaded to a third party server accessible to the public that can't be deleted.

What a travesty of justice. Makes me sick.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
2. It's a great idea. This makes me sick too. The mere fact that the guy peed his pants and drew on
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 07:11 AM
Oct 2015

the family dog makes him unqualified to carry a loaded gun, the goddamned coward.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police withhold videos de...