Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Canadian PM Justin Trudeau brings same support for Keystone XL pipeline
Washington Post:The Canadian election Monday ousted a strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline. And it brought into office another strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline.
The new Canadian prime minister, Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau, has supported the construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline as well as TransCanadas proposed $12 billion Energy East pipeline, both of which would carry bitumen from Albertas vast oil sands to ports and world markets.
Trudeau has said that the pipelines should be important parts of a national infrastructure program he supports. But at the same time, he advocates the adoption of a national plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental groups say that the two positions are incompatible.
Trudeau has also extolled the virtues of carbon taxes, though he has also said that decisions about that might be best left to provincial governments. Many supporters of a more aggressive climate policy say that Canadas federal government needs to take leadership on that front.
The new Canadian prime minister, Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau, has supported the construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline as well as TransCanadas proposed $12 billion Energy East pipeline, both of which would carry bitumen from Albertas vast oil sands to ports and world markets.
Trudeau has said that the pipelines should be important parts of a national infrastructure program he supports. But at the same time, he advocates the adoption of a national plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental groups say that the two positions are incompatible.
Trudeau has also extolled the virtues of carbon taxes, though he has also said that decisions about that might be best left to provincial governments. Many supporters of a more aggressive climate policy say that Canadas federal government needs to take leadership on that front.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 677 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Canadian PM Justin Trudeau brings same support for Keystone XL pipeline (Original Post)
brooklynite
Oct 2015
OP
villager
(26,001 posts)1. So like this administration, he wants to have his (corporate) cake and eat it (greenly) too?
Something's bound to leave a bitter taste in various mouths, under that scenario
Rex
(65,616 posts)2. So he and Obama agree on the Keystone XL. What a shocker.
I love how his victory has the established order crying in their beers!
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)3. Gee, I wonder what other aspiring politician feels the same way?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)4. too bad his pipeline
runs through our country. No Keystone XL. he can figure out another way to get his oil out of the country. It's not our problem. Sounds like another third wayer.
enid602
(8,612 posts)6. hypocrites
Vancouver won't allow the dirty oil through their port. But at least Trudeau can put a liberal face on this grizzly enterprise. Canadians don't like being seen as non-trendy.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)7. yeah, just pollute u.s. waters
no thanks
MurrayDelph
(5,293 posts)5. Why shouldn't he?
Canada gets all the benefit, the US gets all the risk.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)8. Hmm, I wonder why