Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA comprehensive takedown of the Benghazi Committee
A very long and detailed article about the sham that is the Benghazi Committee. As the article notes, it is nothing more than a taxpayer-funded opposition research organization, with the dread power of subpoena and Congressional cover behind it. It is an outrage and a disgrace.
Link to Newsweek article by Kurt Eichenwald
The historical significance of this moment can hardly be overstated, and it seems many Republicans, Democrats and members of the media dont fully understand the magnitude of what is taking place. The awesome power of governmentone that allows officials to pore through almost anything they demand and compel anyone to talk or suffer the shame of taking the Fifth Amendmenthas been unleashed for purely political purposes. It is impossible to review what the Benghazi committee has done as anything other than taxpayer-funded political research of the opposing partys leading candidate for president. Comparisons from Americas past are rare. Richard Nixons attempts to use the IRS to investigate his perceived enemies comes to mind. So does Senator Joseph McCarthys red-baiting during the 1950s, with reckless accusations of treason leveled at members of the State Department, military generals and even the secretary of the Army. But the modern McCarthys of the Benghazi committee cannot perform this political theater on their ownthey depend on reporters to aid in the attempts to use government for the purpose of destroying others with bogus scoops ladled out by members of Congress and their staffs. These journalists will almost certainly join the legions of shamed reporters of the McCarthy era as it becomes increasingly clear they are enablers of an obscene attempt to undermine the electoral process.
The consequences, however, are worse than the manipulation of the electoral process. By using Benghazi for political advantage, the Republicans have communicated to global militants that, through even limited attacks involving relatively few casualties, they can potentially influence the direction of American elections. The Republicans sent that same message after the Boston Marathon bombing, where they condemned Obama for failing toillegallysend the American perpetrators to Guantanamo, among other things.They slammed the president because federal law enforcement agents read the failed underwear bomber his rights after they arrested him in 2009. Never mind that federal agents did the exact same thing under President George W. Bush when they arrested the failed shoe bomber years earlier. Republicans even lambasted Obama when he spoke about ISIS decapitating journalists, saying the president did not sound angry enough.
But there is an enormous difference between politicizing tragedy and using the levers of government to achieve that goal. Put simply, the transformation of the Benghazi attacks into a political drama now serves as one of the most dangerous precedents in American history, one whose absurdity and irrationality can be seen just by reviewing the past. This single Benghazi committee has been investigating the attack for longer than Congress conducted inquiries into Pearl Harbor, 9/11, Iran-Contra, Watergate and intelligence failures in Iraq.
The consequences, however, are worse than the manipulation of the electoral process. By using Benghazi for political advantage, the Republicans have communicated to global militants that, through even limited attacks involving relatively few casualties, they can potentially influence the direction of American elections. The Republicans sent that same message after the Boston Marathon bombing, where they condemned Obama for failing toillegallysend the American perpetrators to Guantanamo, among other things.They slammed the president because federal law enforcement agents read the failed underwear bomber his rights after they arrested him in 2009. Never mind that federal agents did the exact same thing under President George W. Bush when they arrested the failed shoe bomber years earlier. Republicans even lambasted Obama when he spoke about ISIS decapitating journalists, saying the president did not sound angry enough.
But there is an enormous difference between politicizing tragedy and using the levers of government to achieve that goal. Put simply, the transformation of the Benghazi attacks into a political drama now serves as one of the most dangerous precedents in American history, one whose absurdity and irrationality can be seen just by reviewing the past. This single Benghazi committee has been investigating the attack for longer than Congress conducted inquiries into Pearl Harbor, 9/11, Iran-Contra, Watergate and intelligence failures in Iraq.
Much more at the link. The Republicans no longer even pretend to govern; their only goal now is to destroy the Democratic Party, however they can.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 553 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A comprehensive takedown of the Benghazi Committee (Original Post)
BlueCheese
Oct 2015
OP
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. Actually their goal is to destroy the current US Government, they want only a defense
industry and will privatize absolutely everything else.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)2. They don't even want a public defense industry (military) ...
They just want the government to pay for it.
randys1
(16,286 posts)3. That too. BTW, I am now CONVINCED that Hillary bashers
are cons, here and elsewhere.