Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,923 posts)
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 05:16 AM Oct 2015

NATO reveals plan for deploying 4,000 troops on Russia’s borders

Plans to deploy some 4,000 NATO combat troops in countries bordering Russia were reported Thursday amid escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow over conflicting US and Russian military interventions in Syria.

The deployment would represent a qualitative escalation of the US-led alliance’s encirclement and military buildup against Russia, heightening the threat of both war in Europe and a military clash between the world’s two largest nuclear powers.

Adding to the provocative character of the proposed deployment, the troops, drawn from various NATO countries, would be placed under formal NATO command, an arrangement that is put in place in the event of a NATO war against a common enemy. Such a command structure is virtually unprecedented in peacetime.

One proposal under discussion within the alliance would place troops in battalion strength—from 800 to 1,000—in Poland and the former Soviet Baltic republics of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. A less extensive plan would restrict the deployment to a single battalion for the region.

Read more: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/10/30/nato-o30.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NATO reveals plan for deploying 4,000 troops on Russia’s borders (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2015 OP
MIC going to love this newfie11 Oct 2015 #1

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
1. MIC going to love this
Fri Oct 30, 2015, 05:48 AM
Oct 2015

So because Russia is beating the hell out of ISIS in Syria we want to surround Russia with NATO troops?

Am I missing something? Did we not attack and completely destroy Iraq for oil? Then there's the inconvenient truth about the pentagon memo (US to 7 countries in 5 years).

Remember it was Russia that stepped in and removed all the poison gas from Syria. We were told it was Assad killing his own people but no proof at the time and we didn't want to wait for UN inspectors. Putin took the gas and destroyed it. Turns out that gas was from the insurgents per report of UN inspectors.

NOW because Russia is actually beating ISIS they become the bad guy!
Why? Are the stories true that ISIS is funded by America? I have no idea but this mess we have created sure points that way.
MIC is salivating no doubt. Meanwhile the lives lost and future suffering for humanity in that region is deplorable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NATO reveals plan for dep...