What was fake on the Internet this week: Why do we even bother, honestly?
Typically, we use this space to debunk the various hoaxes, charades and conspiracy theories that afflict social media each week. But this week, I cant do it. I must abstain. Because someones done a study on debunk efforts like this one, and bottom line? Theyre all in vain.
To reach this heart-rending conclusion, Walter Quattrociocchi the head of the Laboratory of Computational Social Science at IMT Lucca and a team of seven (!) other researchers studied how two groups of U.S. Facebook users interacted with news on the site. One group was comprised of people who interact with reputable science pages. (Those are the ones who presumably have a level of news literacy.) The other group was made of people who like far-out conspiracy pages anti-vaxxers, Illuminati-watchers, that kind of thing.
They quickly came to two conclusions about the conspiracy and non-conspiracy groups. First off: They didnt overlap at all, which means the misinformed, as well politely call them, were unlikely to ever see the truth. And second, when the conspiracy group did encounter debunking information, it didnt change their mind. In fact, it just made them more resolute: After encountering a post that challenged a conspiracy theory, theorists tend to like and comment on pages about that theory even more.
Do debunk efforts change peoples minds? Well not really. The orange line shows the rate at which people stop engaging with conspiracy posts if they HAVE seen debunks. The green line is the same rate, but if they havent: Its faster. (Quattrociocchi et al)
That counter-intuitive effect, Quattrociocchi writes, has something to do with the conspiracy echo chamber: Because social environments like Facebook allow users to mold it to their own tastes, theyre only ever exposed to people and information that conforms with their beliefs. (More research will be needed, Quattrociocchi has said, to determine if Facebooks algorithms exaggerate that tendency; a controversial study, published last May, suggests that it does albeit modestly.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/10/30/what-was-fake-on-the-internet-this-week-why-do-we-even-bother-honestly/?tid=sm_tw