Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNSA Leaker Thomas Drake Praises Report Showing U.S.’ Failure Toward Whistleblowers
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/nsa_whistleblower_thomas_drake_praises_report_showing_20151123
via truthdig:
Whistleblower Thomas Drake, who in 2010 became the first American charged with espionage in almost 40 years and who was a predecessor of Edward Snowden, applauds a new report by the PEN American Center accusing the government of failing to protect whistleblowers.
The report comes after presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said at last months Democratic debate that NSA whistleblower Snowden could have gotten all the protections of being a whistleblower instead of leaking materials to the press. PENs report shows that Clinton is wrong and that the U.S. government gives employees and contractors little assurance that they wont be prosecuted, even if they go through sanctioned channels.
Of his experience as a whistleblower, Drake said during Secret Sources: Whistleblowers, National Security and Free Expression, a panel at the Newseum in Washington examining the impact of the Obama administrations response to national security leaks, I had become a dissident, as far as the NSA was concerned (...) If you become a dissident, the white blood cells kick in, culturally, to get rid of you.
Charges that Drake passed classified documents to a newspaper reporter were dropped in 2011. He said of the PEN report to Al-Jazeeras America Tonight:
Probably the biggest takeaway for me is its one of the first reports that actually pulled this information all together in a cogent fashion. It gives a history. It shows the dynamics. It shows how things have evolved. It shows how far the administrations, particularly President Obama, have gone in pursuing those who would dare hold up a mirror to power. It talks about the lack of protections for sources. It highlights the risks to journalism, as sources, like myself, are considering engaging in criminal activity. It raises serious questions, extraordinarily disturbing questions, about the government.
The irony of it, in my own case, was that the media was largely my saving grace. The media began to put a spotlight on what was happening. Whats at stake here is free press, to conduct aggressive journalism when dealing with very sensitive topics. National security has an extraordinarily overwhelming influence right now, and it tends to get what it wants. There really is no limit in terms of how much security you want. You want a perfectly secure society? Then I have to give up all rights and all freedoms, but what does that look like? I can play that game, the what-if scenarios. What if? What if? What if? Is it really worth it?
We need a robust press, because thats the foundation of our form of government and the foundation of any free and open society. But what were seeing is a very disturbing trend, as theres a much more autocratic presence thats exerting itself. Its a control mechanism thats born out of fear, and I think it speaks, very disturbingly, to the darker sides of the human condition.
Here, read Drake describe the burden taken on by whistleblowers and his last few years spent in the sights of the U.S. Justice Department.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 285 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post